Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dingess Hartman Letter

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Last year in the last 2 weeks of March- all Ros were supposed to send all claimants a Dingess Hartman letter.

Whether they got a legal VCAA letter or not.

I never got one but figured maybe widows dont- I just found evidence at BVA web site that widows are supposed to get them too.

I never got one as well as a legal VCAA letter.

I am asking my Congressman to sponsor a bill regarding the fact that ROs are defying our DTA rights by only sending legal VCAA letters to some of us but not all.

I might as well ask him to add Dingess Hartman letters too.

The Letter from VA to all veterans and widows with pending claims under Dingess HArtman V Nicholson (2006)does not require responses from veterans but it expands the scope of the VCAA as to telling the veteran what evidence they need.

It is explained here:

http://209.85.165.104/custom?q=cache:Cf7mz...381742111066612

Have you all gotten this letter? They were sent in late March of last year.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

It takes vets fighting back.

This is a scam.

I didn't know for 7 years what it was like to be a VA claimant again.

It actually took me to become a claimant again and then to see what a Scam the VA is pulling on claimants-

I am very impressed with the way that the Kentucky Division of Veterans Affairs

has handled the VCAA and Dingess Hartman as to advising their vet reps.

Jim STrickland (VA WAtchdog) makes this point as to the VCAA:

"The VA fights it but you can use this to your advantage. Invoke VCAA. Read, understand and learn what VCAA can do for you. If you are within a year of the VCAA letter you received, then you have rights to reopen old cases, don't let the time limit pass."

I invoked it and got a fast remand-but how many claimants will invoke it?

That is what it would take-if every veteran who was denied and got an illegal VCAA started demanding their rights at the VA.

I received no support whatsoever from my POA on the VCAA violation-they pick and choose what claims they will actually support and their remands at the BVA show it.

Every vet whose rights have been violated under the VCAA has to fight it as an individual.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reviewing several of the claims I am handleing, I have yet to find a single one.... this is after going thru about 50 files... I'm going to give up... I dont think any were sent out in my neck of the woods. I'd have at least a few of them...

I am going to dig into this....

Bob Smith

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

Yes, I got the Dingess/Hartman letter dated March 20, 2006. At that time my file was sitting at the DRO. It would be almost another year before they made a decision on my claim.

Prior to that, in Sept 2005 I got a letter from the VA that stated "We are processing your disagreement for compensation benefits. We received it Feb 05. In order for us to gather all the evidence we need to make a decision in your claim, we need additional evidence. This letter is to tell you what you need to do."

Under the header "What the VA Needs From You" they go on to ask me about my National Guard unit which was a waste of time because I had already given it to them and more importantly, my claim was that I had been seen on active duty, not while I was in the NG; for the SSN and DOB (I kid you not) of the active duty shrinks who wrote letters supporting my claim initially saying they treated me while I was on active duty; and a request for copies of civilian medical records that I'd already given them.

Since they already had 2:3 of the things they asked for and it was pretty ludicrous to expect anybody in this day and age of identity theft to turn over their SSN and DOB, I thought the letter was useless. However, I sent them the information they asked for AGAIN, and surprisingly enough, one of the shrinks (the other had changed jobs and retired and I can't locate him) sent the DAV his ORB (Officer Record Brief) that proved he was in the capacity he stated he was back in the early 80s and he also attested that he had served with the other shrink.

If this is the great, hallowed "Duty to Assist" letter all it did for me was piss me off that I was waiting months on end only to get a letter asking me for stuff I'd already sent them.

But, back to the original query - Yes, Berta, I got the March 20, 2006 Dinges/Hartman letter. When I called the DAV to ask them what I was supposed to do about it since I'd already replied to the Sept 05 letter asking for my NG info, civilian records, and the shrinks id info, I was told to ignore it and not sign or send it in so I did nothing other than file it. Since the VA had requested my SMR multiple times not signing it may have given me another 6 months delay but on the other hand it gave St Louis 6 more months to cough up my SMRs which they never did.

Thanks,

ts

Edited by tssnave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like you did get a legal VCAA-

The Dingess Hartman letter is supposed to spell out 5 things:

http://www.2ndbattalion94thartillery.com/C...ewVAprocess.htm

(Excellent site and explanation)

It seems to me that only the DAV, and AL and some state divisions fully understand what this letter is all about-

It only went to claimants with claims pending and/or in appeal status in

MArch 2006.It didnt need a response.I never got one nor a legal VCAA letter.

"Since the VA had requested my SMR multiple times not signing it may have given me another 6 months delay but on the other hand it gave St Louis 6 more months to cough up my SMRs which they never did."

You probably answered this before and I forget what you said.

I NEVER ever believe the VA if they say they cant get any SMRs from St. Louis.

I NEVER believe them when they say SMRS were lost in the fire either.

BAsed on experience having the vet themselves try to get them.

Not always but in many many cases the vet got what the VA said NARA didnt have.

I have records here, med recs and SMrs etc from some local vets I helped and just the other day- (I need to get this stuff back to the vets I helped) I found a set of SMRS that VA told the vet were completely destroyed in the St. Louis fire-no char marks whatsoever-they are perfect- we got them via NARa

Have you sent a SF 180 to NARA to try to get them yourself?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

Prior to submitting my claim I tried to get copies of my SMR. I faxed in a request based on what the internet told me to do. I got a fax back that said there were no SMR. I included all dates of service. Then I called in and was told on the phone that they don't usually give psych records to vets but will give them to the VA. This is why I searched for the doc who treated me on active duty and had him write a letter in support of my claim that he treated me, which the VA disregarded because my National Guard SMR didn't have any indication that I'd been seen for a mental disorder. This was correct because I HAD NOT been seen in the NG nor did I ever claim to have been seen in the NG (I was a weekend warrior, not the like they are calling up the NG full time these days and deploying them back to back to the sand).

At this point, since the C&P doc said there was a nexus between the shrink letter and my continued treatment, the DRO granted service connection so I don't see any use worrying about my SMRs any longer. Is there another side to letting sleeping dogs/SMRs lie that I'm not seeing?

Thanks,

ts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use