Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Varo Morning Reports

Rate this question


Berta

Question

The latest RO weekly workload Report (Morning Reports) attached

seems to show a great disparity in where the pre -discharge claims are going.

Does anyone know why this could be happening? are these ROs closest to the base where the pre discharge service person is filing the claim?

As of last week 9364 predischarge claims were filed with ROs

My RO Buffalo got 20 of them.Winston Salem got 2493 of them.

I cannot understand that disparaity- and also-

how can the VA say these predischarge claims (new vets-Iraq predominantly)

are holding up all claims at all ROs?

Morning_Reports_VA.xls

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would hate to have a claim at Winston Salem RO. The VA are chronic liars. I have not really seen much evidence that the VA has changed all that much at the RO's but I have noticed improvement at the VAMC in Dallas.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good Morning pete53 and Berta,My claim was brokered to Togus Maine on Jan 11th from Pittsburgh for rating and final desision. By looking and reading this latest report how does it look for me to coming close for my desision? Sorry but I can't understand the format.

Thankyou and god bless, mrstix

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It certainly would look like they have designated certain ROs to handle pre-discharge claims.

This could be a "good thing" IF they had certain ROs that recieved special training to specifically handle the bulk of the claims coming in now -- and the unique circumstances involved (so they wouldn't be getting the cut and paste" "Your records do not indicate you served in Vietnam..."

I guess the VA can say these claims are holding up the processing of claims for the same reason they say a lot of things -- It sounds good to them -- and people are still pushing that we need to support the vets from THIS war -- So it can make them look good that they are --

Free

The latest RO weekly workload Report (Morning Reports) attached

seems to show a great disparity in where the pre -discharge claims are going.

Does anyone know why this could be happening? are these ROs closest to the base where the pre discharge service person is filing the claim?

As of last week 9364 predischarge claims were filed with ROs

My RO Buffalo got 20 of them.Winston Salem got 2493 of them.

I cannot understand that disparaity- and also-

how can the VA say these predischarge claims (new vets-Iraq predominantly)

are holding up all claims at all ROs?

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their claims that current returning vet claims are holding up they system is total bullcrap. This new claims should be adjudicated in less that 45-60 days as 99 percent of them are for combat injuries. Either it happened or it did not. However, I have seen denials for actual loss of hands and feet so the VA is up to its old games even with the new returning veterans. How can they say that a guy just released from the hospital with an amputation is not service connected? That is how the new claims are slowing the process. It is not the claims it is the VA.

I do not know the amount of new claims but I do know that as we go along there will be several hunderd thousands of claims on top of the 600 thousand now in the works. If VA continues to do it to the pooch as they currently do then yep we are going to have a real problem.

If they would just do their job most of the problems would go away. In denials an hour spent on developing a SOC that meets the requirements of the law could save years of appeals. If you don't have the evidence required then say so and provide what would be needed for the claim to be successful. That is simple and takes just a little bit of time. Just my honest opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I COMPLETELY AGREE!

It IS bullcrap- even if every RO got say 100 claims a week from predischarged or new vets from GWOT and Iraq- how long would it take to make decisions? Their SMRs are fresh as well as their discharge certs-they haven't accumulated stacks of VA med recs yet-

we are talking about no brainer comp awards to obvious service disabled veterans-

You said it all:

"If they would just do their job most of the problems would go away. In denials an hour spent on developing a SOC that meets the requirements of the law could save years of appeals. If you don't have the evidence required then say so and provide what would be needed for the claim to be successful. That is simple and takes just a little bit of time"

This was the PURPOSE of the VCAA!

I have been very vocal in writing to anyone who will listen that the VCAA is perfect but the ROs do not comply with it.

We are being discriminated against-

As the BVA web site and their recent report reveals-

Some claims get legal VCAA letters and some dont-

some vet reps focus on the VCAA because it is more detailed than the SOC as to what the vet needs to send them-

but some vet reps just say what the hell- I wont have to work this claim since VA failed to comply-and if I dont tell the vet or question the RO-this claim will be tied up for years at the BVA only to be remanded again to the RO for a re-do-

and I dont get paid for claim successes -I get paid just to show up at work as a vet rep.

I want to determine who decides who gets into each stack--

at the RO level-

and what vet orgs are allowing this to occur.

I am hot on the tail of my state vet org for their remands due to this violation.

I can only focus on them-I am considering publishing letters in every newspaper in the state of NY -

then again I have been writing to all state officials- to get at least one state vet org to stop this practice--

how many veterans would even know what the real VCAA letter is supposed to be?

But their reps are supposed to know-

The Director of my POA had the nerve to tell me I got a legal VCAA letter-

the proof in my files reveals he is completley wrong-

I had to send NYSDVA the law on the VCAA.

Vets have to be aware of these VCAA violations-

but it is the rep who should question them not the veteran-

The VCAA has caused the biggest scam in my opinion since the VA withheld AO comp (millions)from AO vets under the Nehmer court order and NVLSP had to go in and get their money for them.

This VCAA scam involves more than AO vets-

The BVA web site reveals what I mean and their public decisions and recent report revealed the documented evidence of this continuous VARO scam.

The data theft is nothing-this is a theft of our basic Duty To Assist Rights.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use