Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

100% Schedular Ptsd No Longer Awarded?

Rate this question


vasolas

Question

Please forgive my long-windedness but I'd really appreciate your advice, thoughts and opinions also I guess this is letting off steam for me.

I'm a Vietnam infantry vet and I served as a spotter on a sniper team. I've had about 16 years of intermittent private psychotherapy and continuous VA treatment since 2001. My ptsd claim included an '05 "PTSD Evaluation" from a private psychologist that I've seen weekly for almost 9 years. (it was very detailed but I'm only outlining here) It noted that I had chronic suicidal ideation, homocidal thoughts and that I was a risk to do harm to myself or others. It diagnosed ptsd chronic, severe and major depression, recurrent. It noted that I was medically retired due to ptsd and stated that, due to ptsd, I was totally and permanently disabled, unemployable and unlikely to improve. It assigned a GAF of 30. Also I had included supportive reports from a private social worker, psychiatrist, and former employer that documented my treatment for ptsd going back to 1990 as well as more recent progress notes from my VA hospital.

The VA C&P psychiatrist diagnosed chronic ptsd & major depression recurrent and severe. His report described me as a "hermit" who is "severely impaired socially and vocationally". He wrote that "It is unlikely that this man could ever function in any kind of work capacity at this time". He assigned a GAF of 35.

I'd expected to be awarded 100% schedular ptsd but in June 05 I received 70% and IU was deferred. I filed a NOD with a personal narrative that described how my symptoms had worsened and how they approximated the General Rating Formula for Mental Disorder's criteria for 100% schedular disability. Included was a copy of my recent SSD award due to ptsd, a progress note from a VA psychiatrist that stated that I was "considered totally and permanently disabled for gainful employment", 3 more progress notes all with GAF's of 30, plus other supportive documentation.

In late March 07 I received a SOC that continued my 70% and ignored most of my evidence that supported a grant of 100% schedular. It cited 9 pages of VA regs and 1 of reasons and bases. The R&B's described me as having mild to moderate daily dysphoria, moderate social anxiety symptoms (I've been a hermit for years inorder to cope with severe anxiety,depression and to avoid conflict with people), no violence toward people (my personal narrative described one of several such incidents in which I had crawled with loaded weapon to a car that had stopped at night in the boonies where I live - my VA psychiatrist hadn't quoted this incident directly in his report but had referred to it as an example of my "perpetual combat behaviors"). The SOC also stated that I denied suicidal or homocidal ideations (the preponderance of the many documents I'd sent noted chronic suicidal thoughts (w/o intent) and at least 2 of them reported homocidal thoughts). The SOC selectively plucked from the many documents I'd sent any positive reference to myself and ignored the statements that were supportive of a 100% schedular rating. For example, It used against me one sentence from a report that noted that I had helped to care for my terminally ill father but it made no reference to my occupational impairment, my consistenly low GAF scores and I was not offered another C&P.

I would greatly appreciate any advice, thoughts or opinions about my case and how I might best present my appeal for 100% schedular to the Board (my deadline is near). Perhaps I should be satisfied with 70% and the possibility of IU especially since so many deserving vets aren't even awarded that, and I know that it is now very difficult or perhaps impossible to be granted 100% schedular, but it is a matter of principal to me since I believe that my war-related mental disorder has rendered me 100% disabled.

Also is it possible/likely that VARO will deny me IU when I apply or order me to a C&P for IU? If it is awarded would it be retroactive to my original claim date-June 05?

Incidentally, I believe my claim for 100% schedular would have been granted 6-10 years ago despite the requirement of having psychotic symptoms per the General Rating Formula. I'm aware that VA has been criticised for spending so much and awarding so many 100% schedular awards in the past but I'm not aware of any published documents that have directed VA to limit granting such awards. Does anyone know of such directives or of any VA watchdog who has revealed them?

Does anyone know of anyone who has received 100% schedular ptsd in the past year and of the basis for that award?

Has the VA completely stopped awarding 100% schedular for ptsd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

John:

A point of order. The only bad C&P I got was some old washed up geezer who did not do what the Rating Officer asked him to do. My experience with interns is that they like to cancel prescriptions without telling you.

Pete

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife's C&P history:

1) Initial rating of 100% about two months after medical separation from the military (AmVets "fast track" program)....no C&P was given; they went off of civilian and military records.

2) She was increased from 100% to 100% P&T with A&A on a 15 min exam.

3) They lowered her from 100% to 70% because they "reviewed" her Cfile when she moved to a different RO.....they eventually gave her a 20 min C&P and was awarded 100% P&T with homebound.

Now, all of those C&Ps came with a substantial body of evidence on my part from civilian doctors, but the C&P doctors were compeletely unaware of what was in her C-file. The last one even told me to be quiet or leave and that she, "didn't care about what other doctors said".

I agree with John here...the process is compeletely subjective and totally without merit.

Edited by Jay Johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay,

I don't get why the VA would "review" your wife's C-file simply because she moved to another RO. Is this SOP? And we wonder why there is a backlog of claims...........

ts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use