Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Just Something To Read About The Latest House Of Va Hearings

Rate this question


spike

Question

I figured this is something that should be read here.....It affects all those who have PTSD, Unemployability, etc. It is a Cut and Post from a Larry Scott article.

The House Committee on Veterans' Affairs held a roundtable discussion on PTSD on Wednesday, May16, 2007.The full witness list is here... http://veterans.house.gov/

hearings/schedule110/may07/05-16-07/witness.shtml

Rep. Steve Buyer (R-IN), Ranking Minority Member, invited Dr. Sally Satel to testify. Satel is the paid mouthpiece of the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. Satel's disrespect for veterans with PTSD is a matter of legend. Buyer's "suck it up soldier" attitude is also well-known.

Satel's "blame the veteran" approach is not well-received in the medical community. Quote: "Blaming the veteran for psychological reactions to war fosters stigma, a major reason why veterans do not seek mental health assistance." John A. Fairbank, Ph.D.

For more an Satel, use the VA Watchdog search engine. You'll be amazed at some of the things she has said. Search engine here... http://www.yourvabenefits.org/

What we heard from Satel and Buyer was the "M&M" agenda...minimize and marginalize...that is, minimize the disorder and that marginalizes the veteran. It's a tired old tactic.

Here are Rep. Buyer's opening remarks where he says that PTSD is often used as an "umbrella" and a "catch-all" for any mental disorder...click here to listen or download MP3, 3:36 in length.

Satel's remarks were equally repugnant. She talked about "recovery" and confusing PTSD with other disorders such as phobias, depression and anxiety. She says the VA should be careful of granting 100% benefits for PTSD. Satel added that there must be a "high threshold" for granting PTSD benefits, work is the best therapy and PTSD is a "time-limited" affliction. Here are Satel's opening remarks...click here to listen or download MP3, 9:01 in length.

Later in the hearing there was discussion of "return to work" programs for veterans with PTSD who receive unemployability benefits.

The hearing lasted over 2 hours and 40 minutes. Complete audio is here... http://veterans.house.gov/

hearings/schedule110/may07/05-16-07/05-16-07.wma

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

For any physical disability I would agree, but PTSD is so subjective and it only takes one A-hole doctor to make your life a living hell. I do, however, agree with continuing care....if a PTSD vet just walks away from the VA AND treatment all together, they will have a tough time if the VA goes digging into their files again.

My wife maintains a psychiatrist, for meds, every month to 2 months (depending on how she's doing). This gives her ongoing treatment and shows proof that she still needs meds and other medical services. But, her psych is civilian, so the RO can't use every appointment as a basis for reopening her P&T claim with "new and material evidence"....if they want that, they better go to court for it:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sally Satel is a front for the insurance companies that have been paying ever increasing payouts to cops firefighter and EMTs/ paramedic's for PTSD.

Due to the criteria set by the VA years ago the courts have been ruling in favor of cops firefighters and EMT/Paramedic using the same criteria for these people.

Sally Satel is also one of the insurance company hacks that think fibromyalgia is a mental disorder even though the research in the last few years show that it is a neurological disorder.

Most insurance companies only pay out for 2 years for mental disorders but would have to pay disably for many years for someone with fibromyalgia if its called a neurological disorder.

I AM BOTH A VIETNAM VET AND A EX EMT/FIREFIGHTER

and a CRITICAL INCIDENT STRESS MANAGEMENT/PTSD DEBRIEFER

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Founder
Jay and Allen,

I truely agree that this is disgusting as well as I believe insulting to veterans. Being that I am participating in several NSO's and programs, I am trying to put together a grassroots system of letting our local veterans become more aware. I find that you won't find a lot of these things on CNN, or your local news. I think because sometimes the Veteran community is unaware at times. I hear a lot of times, excuses of why someone doesn't join a Vet Orgs. I believe that they do not see the urgency of what goes on outside their local realm. In short you know what I think a lot of the problems are the doctors, senators etc......were not in the service. I would like to see more veterans who are working and able to work (not those who are too disabled to work in any sense) in the VA Regional and VA hospitals, for our veterans to be understood.

I found this VA hearing very disgusting as well. :angry:

you may find this site helpful http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/

also if you a tool, though it does cost, for starting a grass roots movement http://capitoladvantage.com/capwiz/associations/index.html

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I havent listened to the audio, hopefully I will be able to tonight, but... I've followed the thread and I'd like to make a couple of comments if I may.

It is my PERSONAL opinion... and JUST my opinion that if I am receiving compensation for a mental health issue I should attend all the requested treatment unless it places undue hardship (like traveling to far) upon me. Now dont ya'll get pissed, like it said this is just what I believe. If they are paying me for this condition, then I should attend the requested treatment, and PRAY that it does help and lessen the issues. I AM diagnosed with depression, like so many chronic pain sufferers, and I am being asked to go to weekly counseling sessions. I have agrred to go, if they can arrange it so I dont have to drive over 50 miles. They have, so I'm going. It's just that simple.

Now I personally am VERY concerned with the way PTSD is slowly being manipulated - again MY personal opinion, by the government into what seems to be a less damaging problem, and I suspect with LESS compensation for it in the future. For the new veterans anyway... I am also VERY worried about the supposed Imagery treatment that can CURE PTSD supposedly... I see it as a way for the VA to CURE some of it's PTSD comp people.... Personally I would think long and hard about refusing that treatment as there is no real evidence to support the idea that it can CURE anything... long and hard... yep, even with my normal stance stated above. I think this treatment which has been massively funded and experimented with by the VA is nothing more than a tool for reducing compensation, OPINION again, but since I believe that, I wouldn't feel obligated to take the treatment....

Further, we all need to be VERY careful and understand that we are talking about changes that will take a LONG time to happen. So, for people who are being compensated for PTSD PLEASE do not panic, or get unduely upset... just be aware of what is going on.

So, there you go... I am sorry if I ruffled some feathers, but again its just my opinion, and I am NOT trying to say others should share it... nope, do what YOU think is right. I do think that I am seeing a shift here though, and by all of you alls comments, you are too.

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to sound off a key note here as well. A lot of us who are vets are not the only ones who have suffered. Does everyone also remember 9/11. What about the thosands of people who did survive that terrible day in American history. I am not lumping the families in this but the people who worked in the building. I can see this kind of hearings transfering over into the civilian community as well, as there are probably a lot of agencies, insurance cos, etc...that would like to see that diminish.

-Spike-

Vet Advocate

--------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Six,

Good points. What worries me about PTSD is that the affliction is SO subjective and there's no way to diagnose its level of severity outside of a doctor's *opinion*. Psychiatrists aren't mind readers, nor are they trained to tell if someone is lying and/or over/under-exaggerating....the best they can do is GUESS.

Because of this, I think raters are given a LOT of latitude to "weigh" evidence however they see fit and to sift through evidence and cherry pick the parts that conform to the rater's *opinions*.

When this is coupled with the high/low nature of most PTSD cases, you get very inconsistent ratings from the RO. So, if you go to your regularly scheduled psych appointment at the VA and you're having a "good" day (on a high) your VA doctor might note that you looked upbeat and alert....that information, in turn, can be used against the veteran as a justification to lower them despite the regulations stating that PTSD shouldn't be measured by its high; rather, PTSD should be measured at the low points and how often those low points occur.

So, if the system were fair to mentally disabled veterans I would agree 100% Sixthscents, but it's not and, in my opinion, PTSD vets are better off using tricare/medicare to obtain a *good* civilian psychiatrist.

But, if you trust that the system will always work out in your favor, by all means seek treatment at the VA........just remember that I told ya so when they use that treatment against you in a future eval:-)

However, most other disabilities are far less subjective and VA documentation can actually HELP in future claims....to me, it's a terrible double-standard, but what can we do??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use