Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

When Do They Take Your Money?

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

I posted here quite some time ago about the VA taking money back out of my bank account for my husband's final check. I thought they had taken it. But they still haven't.

They placed a HOLD of the funds on my account (or probably more appropriately, they tried to place a hold on our joint account - and since that was closed the BANK placed a hold on MY account) - but they still haven't taken the money.

The hold was placed May 20, 2007. The hold is still there - and the bank says it will stay there until the VA either takes the money or releases the hold.

It seems odd that they would hold the money so long without taking it.

And it also aggravates me that they can keep an eternal hold on my money.

I wish they would either take it or give it back.

Every time I check my account balance I am reminded that I have money that the VA won't let me spend and there isn't much I can do about it.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Free - haven't figured out what RDFI is, yet. I think the bank is in error. You'll find many organizations claim rules that probably don't exist, that's why "if it can't be read it wasn't said" holds true. Tellers are notorious for making up rules. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RDFI - Receiving Depository Financial Institution.

Thanks. I have just pulled up info for the National Credit Union Administration. This was an off base branch of a Base credit union.

But yes..they have sent me off chasing the wrong rabbits.

I also had the phone company make unauthorized withdrawals from my account in April and May. The funds were never applied to my phone bill -- and I didn't authorize the withdrawals. THe credit union's answer -- turn your phone off - then they can't take funds out of your account.

I tried to explain to them that shutting my phone off would do no good - as the funds were being withdrawn from the bank - without being connected to my phone number.

That is when I closed the joint account the VA tried to reclaim money from. I closed it to keep the phone company from debiting my account without my permission.

However - I have been fighting with the phone company for several months. It takes an hour to go through all the "let me check your phone bill." "No - we didn't take it out of your bank - because it isn't showing on your account." Maybe it is the OLD AT&T. We are the NEW AT&T --Let me transfer you....

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!! I have been through this with THEM too.

Finally after an hour or more someone will get a supervisor (supposedly) who promises to investigate --and to credit my phone bill for the money they took.

But that never happens. I call back to check the status --and the whole thing starts over again. They say they can't track it by bank account number - they can only track it by phone number. There has been no invetigation or even the pretense of one.

I have finally started my dealings with the phone company writing this week - and also sent a complaint to the FCC.

But I am just now realizing the credit union SHOULD have actually resolved this when I reported the unauthorized withdrawals.

Besides closing my account - they should have reclaimed the money that was taken from my acount without authorization -- as I reported it within the time frame.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Free - I figured RDIF was something like that. I've found it best not to allow any company access to your bank account, thru on-line or e-payment methods. I, personally, setup one credit card, with a low credit limit, thru which I make all on-line payments. By doing it thru a credit card the payments have many protections both creditor account access and debit cards lack. I think what is most irritating, for me, is sometimes you're trying to correct some low amount withdrawal and it takes hours. I figure my time is worth something and on a couple of occasions have just written it off rather than having it drag me down trying to recover a relatively small amount of money. In the mean time I ceased any debiting of my bank account. I also transfer automatic deposits to another account, at another bank, immediately.

On the personal side, I hope you are adjusting to your loss, as best you can. You appear to have things under control.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well my bank account is $225 slimmer now. The VA FINALLY reclaimed the March 1, 2007 payment from my husband's Feb 5, 2007 death that they had put a hold on the bank account on May 20, 2007.

According to the IRIS reponse - I won't get the Month of Death payment now until they decide the DIC claim.

Oddly enough - I am relieved that they finally took the money back. I was getting aggravated seeing it sitting held hostage in my bank account - showing on my balance but unavailable to use. I asked them to either take the money or release the hold. You would think if someone died in February they could make up their mind by August.

So at least they did SOMETHING - even if it was just taking the money back.

Technically, what they SHOULD do in these cases IS to actually reclaim the money from the bank account. And then issue a check to the widow. Because the check is payable to the widow.. and there is no guarantee that the widow is the person with rights to the Vet's bank account. So to make sure the widow actually IS the one who gets the money - it DOES make sense that the VA would take it back from the bank and send it to its rightful owner. That way there is no question as to if the widow got the money - or if someone else also had access to the account, or if the account became part of the Estate, etc.

The argument for leaving the money IN the bank account is most often the widow is the joint owner of the account (though I am not sure how this plays out in community propery states). Also - the more steps invloved - the more chances the VA has to make a mistake.

So maybe - some day - down the road - I might get the $225 back.

In the mean time - I am guarding the statement from the bank proving that the VA took the money - so I can prove I didn't already get it.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

free,

I think that it is discusting that the VA would stoop so low as to take the money back.

It is just my opinion, but it looks to me that the VA deliberately delayed the decision on your husbands claim and how convenient for your husbands exit physical not the be in his C-File.

The VA thinks that the majority of us doesn't have the sense of a Mongoose and can figure these things out.

Always,

Josephine

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use