Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vietnam Service Verified

Rate this question


rthomass

Question

I have a document initiated by the Veterans Administration Medical Center to the Veterans Administation Regional Office. VA form 10-7131. In the remarks section it states (top of form block 6) " Vet claiming agent orange exposure. States he was stationed in Nakhon Phanom Thailand. States they sprayed Agent Orange around the perimeter of the basse, which is located 4 miles from the Ho Chi Mihn Trail".

The VARO replied back to the VAMC " Birls shows VADS verified." (BIRLS and VADS are data bases) "Records also show Veteran has Vietnam Service".

I also have via a Freedom of Information Act request have Birls Veteran Information data screen report showing Vietnam Service "Y" (for yes). This was from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration, Washington DC.

I have to the best of my knowledge never stepped foot in Vietnam; but I do have a Vietman Campaign Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. I am one confused Veteran.

Berta...Vike17 any help?

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

CHUCK75 the VARO without any statement by me or inquiry by me stated in comunications with the VAMC that "RECORD ALSO SHOW VETERAN HAS VIETNAM SERVICE" The crux here is what VA stated. Yes I receive both the VSM and the VCM but I myself never contended actual srvice in Vietnam i.e. "Boots on the ground." The VSM and VCM are irrelevant.....VA statement concedes Vietnam Service. And we all know the VA and the Government do not make mistakes....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CHUCK75 the VARO without any statement by me or inquiry by me stated in comunications with the VAMC that "RECORD ALSO SHOW VETERAN HAS VIETNAM SERVICE" The crux here is what VA stated. Yes I receive both the VSM and the VCM but I myself never contended actual srvice in Vietnam i.e. "Boots on the ground." The VSM and VCM are irrelevant.....VA statement concedes Vietnam Service. And we all know the VA and the Government do not make mistakes....

Chuck75 yes the FOIA request has been receiced and ths BIRLS Veterans Identification shows Vietnam Service "checked Y for YES". Received this form from both the VARO as well the VBA.

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish to express my sincere thank you to Berta, john999, Josephine, and chuck75. It is a priviledge to be associated with knowledgeable people.

I just wish VA would let me get off this Merry-Go-Round and give me an award. I want to live out my days in peace.....I think this is not too much to ask for after twenty plus years of service to my Country!

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to beat a dead horse but the local VARO here has sent me three documents in the last few days. #1 Letter dated 30 July 2007 requesting me to update the number of dependents I have for disability pay purposes....never in 25 years since I retired have they done this. #2 Letter dated 20 July 2007 from the AMC stating they are transferring my remanded appeal to my local VARO...so they can reach a decision on my remanded appeal. #3 A letters (3 copies all the same) from the Veterans Service Center Manager dated 1 August 2007 telling me that via data print out that My remanded claim has departed the AMC ad of 20 July 2007 for the local VARO.

It sure sems like a flurry of activity in light of my being unable to detetmine by phone where my claim file is as of 4 August 2007. These people need to work as a disinformation arm in the US Government. (15 days and no receipt acknowledged by the VARO).

I have been on a merry go round trying to ascertain where the "C" file is located. I am told it is stille at the BVA, It is at the General Counsels Office, It is still at the AMC despite written letters and data printouts tha it has left the AMC as of 20 July 2007 on the way to the local VARO....must be walking it down the Blue Grass Parkway to the VARO. VARO has no clue as to where it is.........these people are amazing.

JUST KEEP ALL THE BALLS IN THE AIR,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

To me the request for updated dependent info is either a device intended to slow things down, a procedural check the box type of request, or a change in award is in the offing. At least you know somebody is doing something, if not exactly what.

I received another "we are still working" letter today. A previous one was dated June 1.

Cheer up things can be worse!

I have no Idea where things are actually at. Just one part of the claim doubles (By scheduler rules, should be slam dunk, retro is possible) the current payment. Another part adds a "special schedule" item. Finally, the claim seeks service connections for conditions "caused or aggravated" by a current SC condition. The interesting part of the claim adds something that was originally denied under old rules (implied, but not spelled out in the denial), and since medical practice changed, becomes an independently claimable item. (With military hospital treatment records to back it up.) Just to add to the pile, I recently sent a copy of the SSA determination of 100% disability that associates the disability with a currently SC condition as secondary to a primary condition aggravated or caused by the SC condition. And thanks to a screw up by a state VSO, I had to NOD part of an earlier claim that was awarded at a 10% level that should be higher.

Another part of the effort involves SSA. They came up with an effective date later than the law allows (To avoid paying retro) So I had to file documents with them stating that the medical evidence clearly justifies an earlier effective date than they used. It's one of those odd situations where medical evidence and other events suggest that you really should not be working, yet the employer carried you until a govt. contract ended. After that, it was about a year before I was able to accumulate enough medical records for the VA, and while I was at it, use the records for both claims.

Perhaps the weakest item in the list of things that SC was applied for is an interesting one, since it causes pain, does not show up on X rays, yet is clearly shown on a CAT scan or MRI. The only test that might have shown it in the far past was not done, due to a real chance of the test causing problems worse than I had to begin with. Yet, an IMO from a qualified board certified specialist indicates "more likely than not" a result of military service.

I have yet to see a request for a C&P. (Knock on wood) The stack of VA and non VA treatment and drug list is large, and some of parts of the claim are even substantiated by a VA veteran's center physician. (That got into another little bag of worms. Seems that they never heard of or were ignoring the VA form used and the directive to fill it out if asked by a veteran. I had to present the Veteran's Center Administrator with a copy of the guide containing the instructions. I did not know such existed, until I ran across the info somewhere on Hadit.

(My spelling checker decided to correct all the typos, mine and yours--sorry)

I don't want to beat a dead horse but the local VARO here has sent me three documents in the last few days. #1 Letter dated 30 July 2007 requesting me to update the number of dependents I have for disability pay purposes....never in 25 years since I retired have they done this. #2 Letter dated 20 July 2007 from the AMC stating they are transferring my remanded appeal to my local VARO...so they can reach a decision on my remanded appeal. #3 A letters (3 copies all the same) from the Veterans Service Center Manager dated 1 August 2007 telling me that via data print out that My remanded claim has departed the AMC ad of 20 July 2007 for the local VARO.

It sure seems like a flurry of activity in light of my being unable to determine by phone where my claim file is as of 4 August 2007. These people need to work as a disinformation arm in the US Government. (15 days and no receipt acknowledged by the VARO).

I have been on a merry go round trying to ascertain where the "C" file is located. I am told it is still at the BVA, It is at the General Counsels Office, It is still at the AMC despite written letters and data printouts That it has left the AMC as of 20 July 2007 on the way to the local VARO....must be walking it down the Blue Grass Parkway to the VARO. VARO has no clue as to where it is.........these people are amazing.

JUST KEEP ALL THE BALLS IN THE AIR,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

rthomass,

See if this will light a fire under them.

Call Honorable Daniel Cooper's Officer - Undersecretary for Veteran's Benefits. Here is his telephone number.

1 - 202- 273-6763

This will be his " Private Secretary". Be sure to tell her the story that you have posted here on line. Tell her of your urgency and why.

She may ask you to send him a private fax of your circumstances and be sure to address the letter to the Honorable. This he does insist upon.

Hope that this helps,

Josephine

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use