Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Not Va Employees

Rate this question


littlejuniata

Question

Letter states that the doctors are under contract with the VA for cardiac services, they are employees of the University Of Pittsburgh but they are not part of the federal government and its employees are not VA employees and are not covered by the Federal Tort Claims ACt. True of False. Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I would have to say False, off the top of my head. VA Hospital, VA guide line? Let me put it another way, I subcontract out work to another guy I am ultimately responsible for the job, no matter who does the work I'm the one paying for the fixin. Government don't wipe unless they are 100% where and why most of the time they are in the clear. I'm sure they covered there bases as something as simple as this. I going to a private DR sub out by the VA, everything is paid by and sent to the VA. RC

Edited by yoggie2

GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.

"Do more than is required of you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Go after the doctor, name the VA also in the lawsuit. That way you get 2 for the proce of one.

I believe you have a limited time to file.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

False, False, False. You have been given some good info on this board in a different post about how the VA tries to use this as a defense when the VA has had an occurence of malpractice. Have you spoken to an attorney yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go after the DOCTOR the hospital and the VA> Make sure you get all the names of those people

that was in the Operating room as they as responsible for not observing the blundering idiot that

operated on you. You only have 1 year from date of surgery to life a lawsuit. If the VA said he is

not and employee check who paid him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need an attorney. Although their statement would not hold water if it were a private firm, you are dealing with the government. They may have included a clause in the contracts with these universities that renders the US govt harmless in malpractice proceedings. Only an attorney who handles govt contract law can help you skin this one. Run fast the the office of one.

Now in the real business world if you hire me to put in a pool for you and I send in a sub-contracted back hole digger guy who runs over your husband then your beef is with he and I for he was an idiot for not watching what he was doing but he was rep'ing me and my business while he was in your yard digging the pool. However, with the way the govt works they have probably figured out a way to get around the real law. Run, run, run my dear one to an attorney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good Malpractice lawyer will know right away -who has liability here--whether they fall under FTCA as a VA employee or whether they are on the staff at a private hospital.

I asked what Jim asked-and cant find your answer- what VAMC did this happen at?

Although I have read the info here- I certainly am not sure what kind of liability the VA has yet-and maybe this is a private medical center's fault-

You have to act fast on this- as this site shows- the Statute of Limits against private hospitals- can be as short as 6 months-depends on many factors-

FTCA SOL has no bearing on SOls for private medical lawsuits.

There are many law firms on the net who handle FTCA and private lawsuits due to medical malpractice:

http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/...alpractice.html

(some actual cases against VA at this site and contact form)

I think this attorney Robb Graham, advertises here on the ticker at top of page sometimes:

http://www.vamalpractice.com/

This site too-

http://www.vet4vet.net/?referrer=source&am...CFSBMGgoduyty7g

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use