Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cue Or - Motion For Reconsideration ?

Rate this question


Done wit this

Question

Does anyone Know whats easyer to get? Does the motion for reconsideration only work on a BVA final decision or can that be used on a decision by a regional office? and last but not least can I file this with the Board of Veterans Apppeals in DC if the final decision was made by a regional office and never appealed

Thanks in advance!

Macool

"We should not have to fight the system, We fought to protect"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I would say that a Request for Reconsideration (remember that nowhere in the reconsideration are you to say that you disagree with the decision) would be much faster. I used the reconsideration at the local level because I had new evidence. I received a decision in about 4 months.

Steve

Edited by stevedenesha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gee- I forgot to mention Rick- my Cues are being worked on under a Reconsideration Request- at the VARO level-

I was able to file the formal NOD on time -within days of that deadline- and also within the timeframe to get a lawyer- under those new regs-havent sought a lawyer yet-

as my POA status is technically still in limbo.

A CUE made by a VARO is filed with the VARO as a CUE claim- and then if denied- a reconsideration request can be made to the same VARO- and also a formal NOD can be filed before the NOD deadline-

A BVA decision containing CUE can be filed as a Motion with the BVA.

In my old BVA CUE-I had to file this motion-and they denied but years later the CUE was awarded anyhow-

The VARO also attempted to re-open another CUE I had at the BVA-last year-by filing a VARO Motion at the BVA-but I have no status on that one at all-

The BVA asked me what BVA decision they might have filed it on and I was not sure-as the RO failed to tell the BVA the date of the decision they filed the Motion on- you would think-since they took this step- that they would have known.

I am not even interested in that claim.I could easily get another IMO for that one but My AO death claim preceded all the other stuff they had and has considerable evidence to award.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I am going with a motion for reconsideration. Seems to me thats the better way to do it because you are not pointing out the error. just asking them to take another look at everything in the file now. easyer to ask then tell.

My original decision was in 1997 at the winston salem,NC RO, that can still be filed here in NY with our RO correct?

When they do the reconsideration Then the RO would and Should,see the new and Material Evidence, My SMR's that I submitted and then they would have to Apply 38CFR part 3, sec. 3156 -- part ©, and my retro should be payed. Think I have got this, correct me if I am wrong

Macool

"We should not have to fight the system, We fought to protect"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"My original decision was in 1997 at the winston salem,NC RO, that can still be filed here in NY with our RO correct?"

Rick-I think I said this all wrong-

a reconsideration on a CUE involves a CUE denial (or any claim what has just been awarded but the vet disagrees with-so in some cases a reconsideration is appropriate for newly granted claims.)

In your case I guess you would have to file the reconsideration with Buffalo but draw them out on the older denial- You dont need to file this as a Motion- that is only if you were denied by the BVA.

The VBM (NVLSP Manual)in cases like this is great because it explains all this in much detail.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta, basically a reconsideration is for an issue that was denied, is that how it goes? What support or changes need submitted to makesuccessful reconsideration? Diagnosis or IMO? or? My recent rating may have the criteria; just not sure. Yes, I'll research meanwhile too. cg

"My original decision was in 1997 at the winston salem,NC RO, that can still be filed here in NY with our RO correct?"

Rick-I think I said this all wrong-

a reconsideration on a CUE involves a CUE denial (or any claim what has just been awarded but the vet disagrees with-so in some cases a reconsideration is appropriate for newly granted claims.)

In your case I guess you would have to file the reconsideration with Buffalo but draw them out on the older denial- You dont need to file this as a Motion- that is only if you were denied by the BVA.

The VBM (NVLSP Manual)in cases like this is great because it explains all this in much detail.

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

CUE claims are the hardest to win and the most powerful. Reconsiderations are best when you have new evidence. A reconsideration and a CUE are different animals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use