Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dod Pulls Pd

Rate this question


Berta

Question

http://www.vawatchdog.org/07/nf07/nfDEC07/nf122207-1.htm

Their estimates seem impossible -wonder if they will re-post the article.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I really thing alcoholism was worse than drugs in the Army in 1970-71. However, drugs got the attention of the military whereas all the drunks were tolerated. When mom and pop back home found out via the media that junior was taking dope in the Army the shit hit the fan. When we left out of Vietnam the guy in charge of our group said he was going to leave the room and for all of us to drop our drugs into a box. He said when he came back with a drug dog we would be in trouble if he found it on us. You should have seen the people dumping their dope. Pretty funny. I had heard the situation in Germany was even worse especially race riots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I missed the race riots in Germany (where I served 15 years) mentioned previously. However, the Army did institute drug testing at some point (don't remember when) and many personnel were discharged for

use of illegal drugs including a close family member who was caught during an unannounced urinalysis. He had smoked pot during leave. Additionally, many personnel who showed signs of alcohol abuse were referred to and often required to attend classes and residential treatment for their problems.

Edited by Manitou Sprgs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Was shown recently by my doc that years ago a disgnosis was placed in my records that would have effected a PD release, but was somehow overlooked. SMR entry short time later,different doc kindly corrected the diagnosis. Whew, guess it was close! My original C&P gave me a 'probable' diagnosis of pd, as well as a laugh and much stress to me. Thank God and Hadit, many years later with the pd 'probable' diagnosis is changed now to mdd!

In Germany, I saw flights&squadrons caught with drugs, MPs, and others after R&R bus trips to Amsterdam or returning from TDYs to Turkey or Spain. Not sure if those were PD discharges, just probably kept 'quiet' considering the sheer numbers. Sure was lots of drinking on the job, just like water and much too often. I too saw and know how much alchohol and drugs hurt military families, overseas and stateside, too many. My heart goes out to todays military warriors and the unseen stressors that could effect them a possible PD label while on active duty and after even!

I missed the race riots in Germany (where I served 15 years) mentioned previously. However, the Army did institute drug testing at some point (don't remember when) and many personnel were discharged for

use of illegal drugs including a close family member who was caught during an unannounced urinalysis. He had smoked pot during leave. Additionally, many personnel who showed signs of alcohol abuse were referred to and often required to attend classes and residential treatment for their problems.

Edited by cowgirl

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw plenty of drugs in the US Army 1969-70 in Europe and also a lot of drunks.

During my first few years in the Army and while living in barracks, I thought it was SOP for each barracks to have an overweight, red-nose sergeant assigned to one of the small rooms at each end.

They would usually stagger in around midnight...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the 70's I started out as a legal specialist, went on to make 1SG as a Special agent and finally retired as a CWO in the Army. I too have see my share of bad ones. Murders, rapes, thieves, doppers, child molesters and drunks. A division is just like a small city so it has it all. Never got to see the final discharge on the bad ones but they all originally began with some very nasty people so no telling what the Army ended up doing (discharge wise).

In the 70's drunks were a normal part of the culture. I had a platoon sergeant that would become durnk during our PT runs. He was an alcoholic and had so much alcohol in him that when his blood got to pumping through his body it made him drunk. He was Top's and the battalion SGM's buddy so no body fooled with him. It was just a part of life. Even at the end of my career as long as you did not hold a TS clearance drinking, at any level, was just fine. All you had to do was stay out of trouble with the locals and make it to formation on time hahahaha.

Yep we agents had our share of them also. Lots of dirty skeltons in the closets of investigators. Just as long as you did not become a murder, rapist etc..... You tended to have a successful career. I guess there is some truth to the ole saying that if you want to catch a criminal you gotta think like one. So I guess that in order to think like one you gotta know the tradecraft hahahaha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: "...In the 70's drunks were a normal part of the culture. I had a platoon sergeant that would become durnk during our PT runs. He was an alcoholic and had so much alcohol in him that when his blood got to pumping through his body it made him drunk. He was Top's and the battalion SGM's buddy so no body fooled with him. It was just a part of life. Even at the end of my career as long as you did not hold a TS clearance drinking, at any level, was just fine. All you had to do was stay out of trouble with the locals and make it to formation on time hahahaha..."--Ricky

I can beat that. There was a guy who ran just in front of me during PT runs who almost made ME drunk because of the amount of alcohol that was coming from his body! He must have gotten completely toasted every night because I don't remember ever not having that horrible smell flowing back from him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use