Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

90 Day Letter On Its Way From Bva

Rate this question


Josephine

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Here is the latest, I think I have had it!!

Well, I just called the BVA. I was told my claims file left

the legal team

and now I have been mailed a 90 day letter to respond.

What can they possibly do to me now?

I have been at the BVA remanded to AMC for another almost two years

and before I receive the SSOC. The claims examiner calls me to advise

me to waiver my 60 days to submit new evidence to AMC.

She politely walks the file back to BVA.

I secure the IME and I think now it is being

considered as " NEW EVIDENCE".

Doesn't it sound like, I am starting the process again?

I will never live to see the end of this claim.

I may just have to drop the whole darn mess.

I don't know how to fight this thing any longer.

Always,

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Woo Hoo! I'm getting my party dress ready!!! :lol:

Free

Betty

The day you win your claim we are going to throw a Hadit party. You will be a bright and shinning light to all those who are fighting the power.

John King

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Betty

The day you win your claim we are going to throw a Hadit party. You will be a bright and shinning light to all those who are fighting the power.

John King

John,

I remembered your post about needing another opinion.

I understand I am getting the letter, because the file was walked

over from the AMC to the BVA and then I turn in the IME.

Just to be on the safe side, I took your advice and contacted Dr.

Wilson for another opinion. He is also a Board Certifed Forsensic

Psychiatrist with 30 years experience and the highest credentials,

graduated from Harvard Medical School.

Dr. Crowley graduated from Yale.

I am going in and knock those two nuts off the map.

If they remand and sent it back to those two again, I bet they will

come up with the truth and leave off the appears.

You guys can have a party while I pass out somewhere.

Always Appreciate,

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Woo Hoo! I'm getting my party dress ready!!! :lol:

Free

Free,

Just don't gain or loose any weight. It may be this time next year and me still going with this claim.

Always the Best to You!

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Betty

The day you win your claim we are going to throw a Hadit party. You will be a bright and shinning light to all those who are fighting the power.

John King

I won't have to dress up, will I?

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I won't have to dress up, will I?

rentalguy,

Just don't purchase your new clothes anytime soon. We may have several changes of seasons before this party, but you will all be invited.

Always Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Betty - I'm w/ Free, I don't see how, at this point, they could continue to deny your claim. I'm all for a party, keep us posted. ;-)

Free,

What if a claim comes down to how the VA weighed the evidence? If the courts won't overrule the way the VA weighted the evidence then what recourse does a vet have when they ignore outside evidence in favor or their own (or just ignore their own evidence when it's favorable to the vet)?

I know the VA can "weigh" evidence as it sees fit but can't the vet challenge the way they weighed the evidence (as in, our C&P exam is right and your IMO is wrong) or must you fight the claim on the sheer volume of evidence and the number of reports (as in getting 3 IMOs to the VA's 1 C&P exam)?

Here are your statements that bring up these questions in my mind:

"The Court of Veteran's appeals won't actually re-decide claims. They can decide the law and regulations weren't followed - but they won't retry the facts. So they won't get into the issue of how evidence was weighed. They won't determine that your evidence is more credible than the BVA said it was.

If the BVA denies - and there is ANY evidence to support the denial - the Court won't put the decision aside on THAT basis. (They won't say your evidence was stronger than the evidence the BVA relied on). If there are medical opinions that support the BVA's decision - they will uphold it and not redecide what weight that evidence would have been afforded."

Thanks,

TS Snave

Edited by tssnave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use