Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Can You Believe "we" Proved My Claim 44 Years Later

Rate this topic


Josephine

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Hi Betty,

First off, congratulations. What a tremendous feat you have accomplished.

I think you will need to cue the 1978 decision. If I remember sorrectly, they had your SMRs at the time but the Drs writing was not legible. You just recently added his corrected notes as evidence that you had an in-service diagnosis (look up a thread we discussed some time ago about a case you thought was exactly like yours but I pointed out that the veteran in that case had an in-service diagnosis and you did not). We all know you had the diagnosis but the fact that the VA could not, or would not acknowlege that is what they were basing their denial on. They will not read between the lines or give the veteran the benefit of doubt unless they are forced to with medical evidence. You did that with your records and IMO.

With that said, I think they will give you 100% based on all the things you've mentioned. But I think the effective date will be when you actually reopened the 1992 denial that you never appealed. At least tey say you didn't appeal it. I don't know. So say you submitted new evidence in 2004 and the current appeal goes back to that denial then that will be your effective date.

The VA has a duty to assist. If the Dr. was still alive they should have contaced him to clarify his records. I don't know if that duty to assist existed in 1978 or not. Your work is never done.

But you can relax knowing you've been vindicated and proven correct for the past 30 years. Once you get the adjudication letter tear it apart and stick it to them, if you need to. Hopefully they will do the right thing.

rdawg

rdawg,

I submitted the new and material evidence in 2004 which reopened the claim of 1992.

I would like to see a copy of the letter they mailed me, for I never filed in 1992.

If I could get them to pay me back to that date, I would shut up. I am afraid they will want to go to 2004.

What do you think?

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder
Betty;

Many, many congrats to you on this. I know (and have read) how hard you have worked to get this done, and I congratulate you on your victory.

Enjoy!!

Pat

Thanks so much, Pat,

Good luck with your husbands' claim.

always,

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Betty....take time to live...hold fast to those you love...and know that a wrong has been righted...

The truth always prevails in the end...you have overcome a great injustice and I can not express how my heart is full of gladness for you and your family.

MT

Isaiah 54:17

"No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If I could get them to pay me back to that date, I would shut up."

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Betty - shut up when they still owe her something?????

Yeah. Right.

They tried so hard to shut you up -- and you got louder and louder.

I was thinking they did not HAVE some of the records - and YOU sent them - and then they tried to say they couldn't read some of THOSE (the ones that were favorable of course....)

I would go back to the earliest date you filed ANY claim for anxiety - and argue for a CUE - as material evidence in the SMRs was not available to the RO - and it was also not available to anyone giving a medical opinion.

If the VA sends your C-file to doctors for an opinion - and the evidence of in service treatment is not in the file when the Dr. issues their opinion - then the doctors opinion shouldn't be used to show you wouldn't have gotten benefits back then anyway.

The missing SMRs MATERIALLY effected your claim. You had SMRs showing in service treatment. THe VA did not obtain them - so any medical opinions they obtained that said your anxiety wasn't service connected, should be discounted - because the opinion was based on the incomplete evidence provided to them by the VA.

Free

rdawg,

I submitted the new and material evidence in 2004 which reopened the claim of 1992.

I would like to see a copy of the letter they mailed me, for I never filed in 1992.

If I could get them to pay me back to that date, I would shut up. I am afraid they will want to go to 2004.

What do you think?

Betty

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Superb NEWS Josephine- we all were waiting for this to arrive and to be REALly an award .

The last IMO you got must have put them well over the edge-

GREAT news! Now you can sit back and relax -whew!!!!!!!

the heck with those VA shrinks!!!!

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
"If I could get them to pay me back to that date, I would shut up."

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Betty - shut up when they still owe her something?????

Yeah. Right.

They tried so hard to shut you up -- and you got louder and louder.

I was thinking they did not HAVE some of the records - and YOU sent them - and then they tried to say they couldn't read some of THOSE (the ones that were favorable of course....)

I would go back to the earliest date you filed ANY claim for anxiety - and argue for a CUE - as material evidence in the SMRs was not available to the RO - and it was also not available to anyone giving a medical opinion.

If the VA sends your C-file to doctors for an opinion - and the evidence of in service treatment is not in the file when the Dr. issues their opinion - then the doctors opinion shouldn't be used to show you wouldn't have gotten benefits back then anyway.

The missing SMRs MATERIALLY effected your claim. You had SMRs showing in service treatment. THe VA did not obtain them - so any medical opinions they obtained that said your anxiety wasn't service connected, should be discounted - because the opinion was based on the incomplete evidence provided to them by the VA.

Free

Free,

I don't get why the Judge didn't place the percentage and determine the date to pay me back to.

The last sheet of paper says, " If you are satisified with our decision, we will send your file back from the BVA to the R. O to implement the BVA's decision."

I don't see how I had any choice in that decision, for they sent the file back the same day they mailed me this letter.

What decision did the Judge make for them to implement?? I must be missing something here.

Now what???

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use