Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Can You Believe "we" Proved My Claim 44 Years Later

Rate this topic


Josephine

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Free Spirit

During Vietnam the Army used the PD discharge process on vets who had served complete tours in a combat zone. They did it to thousands just to save money, and damn the veteran. I bet thousands of vets with PTSD were kicked out on PD, bad conduct and being unfit. They cut these guys no slack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

John:

The truth is during Nam the Military took pride in cutting Vets off at the knees to prevent them from getting benefits that they had earned.Even the Shrinks were in on it.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. I remember Vietnam. (I campaigned for McGovern ;) ) But I was somewhat young and didn't know much until the tail end of it. (I am 51). It's odd because I remember so many times someone coming to school and getting a student out of class. They would leave crying...but you would have to find out through the whispered grapevine what had happened. Their brother had been killed.

But we only got to find out through the whispers. It was briefly mentioned and then not discussed again. I have no idea why they didn't announce it. Why our flag wasn't lowered. Why they didn't pay Taps. Something.

One of the student's in the school's brother had been serving his country (most likely drafted) and had been killed in his service. But instead of honoring him as a hero - the death was whispered.

I even remember going with my friend's parents to the local VFW. They had dances on the weekends. But they wouldn't let the Vietnam vets in. The old guys kept saying Vietnam wasn't a war.

And I remember many Vietnam vets "welcome" home.

Our country really disgraced itself - in its treatment of Vietnam vets - and continues to do so.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I always find it amazing that Vietnam vets have to try to prove they experienced a "stressor." ;)

Maybe the RO's should all be sent to a war zone on a field trip - and see if they find the experience a bit stressful.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And another thing about the draft. I think if they draft you - you should have the presumption of soundness for EVERYTHING! If you were sound enough for them to take you - you were sound enough...

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations! I am greatly encouraged by your testimony to remain tenacious.

Forty-four years...my gosh...may God richly bless you in the award of the compensation benefits due you. I pray it is a more speedy process than what you had to endure to get service connected. Best regards!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use