Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Can You Believe "we" Proved My Claim 44 Years Later

Rate this topic


Josephine

Recommended Posts

I think that is a DISTINCT possibilty - because of the BVA stating that the military discharged her KNOWING this. They basically KNEW she had a claim - so they tried to destroy it. That might be on THEM now. It just isn't playing fair to make you sign papers to destroy your medical records to let you out KNOWING those medical records would show a SC illness.

I think she has a valid claim that she should be paid all the way back to discharge - because THEY hid (and tried to destroy) the evidence that granted SC.

Basically, Betty caught them at their own game.

Free

Betty,

You wrote "I ask the BVA for 100% service connection back to 1978 due to the " Psychiatric Records" never acquired by the VA."

How and when have you asked them for 100% back to 1978? Verbally with Ms. Moyer or in writing?

I certainly think you're entitled to the 1978 EED since they didn't get your psyc records in the original claim processing.

I'm curious how, legally, the fact that they wanted to DESTROY those records and told you you were NOT eligible for benefits when you got out may give you wiggle room for an even EED back to discharge. Just speculating at this point. After you get the 1978 EED then perhaps you'll turn your attention to the 14 years BEFORE 1978 (just a thought - Berta, keep your thinking cap on and me and I believe the many other members watching this thread will do the same).

Keep us posted and God Bless,

TS

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder
Betty,

You wrote "I ask the BVA for 100% service connection back to 1978 due to the " Psychiatric Records" never acquired by the VA."

Tom, The VA has known from the very beginning what I expected from them 100% service connection for chronic anxiety paid back to 1978. It is in the NOD when I gave the R.O a copy of those records, In a letter to the BVA and in a Statement in Support of Claim to the AMC and then back again to the Judge at the BVA.

How and when have you asked them for 100% back to 1978? Verbally with Ms. Moyer or in writing?

Always in writing. They must have at least 30 papers stating I want paid 100% for chronic anxiety back to 1978. Ms. Moye can just see all the papers in my claims file. She works for the Under Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

I certainly think you're entitled to the 1978 EED since they didn't get your psyc records in the original claim processing.

Without those records, I had no claim. Absolutely no proof of treatment or the reasons for my early discharge.

I'm curious how, legally, the fact that they wanted to DESTROY those records and told you you were NOT eligible for benefits when you got out may give you wiggle room for an even EED back to discharge.

I sent the BVA a copy and they did enter it in as " New and Material Evidence."

Just speculating at this point. After you get the 1978 EED then perhaps you'll turn your attention to the 14 years BEFORE 1978 (just a thought - Berta, keep your thinking cap on and me and I believe the many other members watching this thread will do the same).

I believe there is a lot of people watching this claim. The impossibe happened. The VA was beat at their own game.

Keep us posted and God Bless,

I sure will and thanks so much,

Betty

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Founder

josephine let me know when the money hits the bank, so i can do the hokey pokey, you put your left foot in, you take your left out, oh i better wait for the money in the bank.

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Its sort of weird when I was awarded my claim the rater apologized for how long it took also.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I think that is a DISTINCT possibilty - because of the BVA stating that the military discharged her KNOWING this. They basically KNEW she had a claim - so they tried to destroy it. That might be on THEM now. It just isn't playing fair to make you sign papers to destroy your medical records to let you out KNOWING those medical records would show a SC illness.

I think she has a valid claim that she should be paid all the way back to discharge - because THEY hid (and tried to destroy) the evidence that granted SC.

Basically, Betty caught them at their own game.

Free,

We all put the pieces of the puzzle

together for them. We all caught them at their game.

No one goes to the BVA on a Preliminary Decision from the DRO, but I

did.

Can't you just see the look on someone's face when they read my

Form - 9.

I would post it, but it is a joke.

I talked to Ms Moye this morning and she called Huntington for me.

They have located my 1978 filing papers. Well, now that is getting us

to 30 years and she said they have also located the 1983 NSC Pension,

Unemployable to 1983 and 100% for Anxiety.

Said she has only seen one other case like this one. Said the raters

were working constantly on my file.

It seems like one is doing the figuring and then another person is

checking that one.

She said her computer is set to call them April 10th to see if the

letter has been mailed.

Said this file will be going in all different directions.

Signatures and Signatures and to the Command.

Thanks again,

Betty

Free

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Its sort of weird when I was awarded my claim the rater apologized for how long it took also.

Pete,

Do you think that they may decide to send me a letter of apology?

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use