Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Fast Letter

Rate this question


Josephine

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Isn't this telling me at any point the BVA Judges' decision can be over-turned?

The Fast Letter actually proscribes three levels of review for these EEDs and awards over $250,000. First, the rating officer makes a decision. If the decision involves a grant of an effective date 'retroactive eight or more years"'or results in a lump-sum payment of $250,000 or more, then it will be reviewed by the 'Post-Determination team' at the RO. Then it will be reviewed by the RO's Veterans Service Center Manager and finally by the C&P Service in Washington. At any stage of the review process the original decision could be changed.

Thanks

Josephine

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Betty,

Yes, you read it right. Now, having said that, please don't borrow trouble and worry about this. Your claim has "special handling" on it and given this $250,000 is currently in court review I don't think they'll try to pull this on you. It is really bad press to award a vet what is rightfully theirs and then yank it back.

I am hopeful Berta or VAwatchdog.org will let us know when the court case on this $250,000+ retro review case is over and won on behalf of vets.

Hang in there,

TS

Thanks Tom,

This claim of mind reminds me of the days of being caught in a

wringer washing machine.

Press the release and hope for the best.

I will have to say, if they yank this away from me, then the

news media will come into play.

Altered records will finally be seen by all.

Thanks

Josephine

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think since you will be getting such a large retro - it has kicked in every safety feature the VA has-

The compentence - to make sure they don't send a huge chunk of money to someone who can't handle it - to protecct both you and them

The review of the review - to make sure all the rules were followed, the correct standards applied, that the amount is figured appropriately - etc.

I don't think they could overturn the BVA decision. It looks like the fast letter just addresses effective date. And the BVA did not set the effective date - though they sent a pretty strong message that implied it should go back to the date of discharge.

It is actually possible that the Fast Letter could work in your FAVOR - it STARTS with the level of the least competent - and moves up. So it is even possible that the later reviews will grant you an earlier effective date than the locals did.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Vietnam Tanker

Be patient, you will get the desired results, this sounds like another VA ploy to delay, and deceieve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I think since you will be getting such a large retro - it has kicked in every safety feature the VA has-

I would just like for them to close the chapter soon on this claim.

The compentence - to make sure they don't send a huge chunk of money to someone who can't handle it - to protecct both you and them

As long as they purchase what I want with the money, I don't care if they write out the check.

The review of the review - to make sure all the rules were followed, the correct standards applied, that the amount is figured appropriately - etc.

As you said, this could be for the best.

I don't think they could overturn the BVA decision. It looks like the fast letter just addresses effective date. And the BVA did not set the effective date - though they sent a pretty strong message that implied it should go back to the date of discharge.

I hope that is it. I don't care if they add years.

It is actually possible that the Fast Letter could work in your FAVOR - it STARTS with the level of the least competent - and moves up. So it is even possible that the later reviews will grant you an earlier effective date than the locals did.

That is so true. Thanks and I will try to calm down.

Josephine

Free

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Be patient, you will get the desired results, this sounds like another VA ploy to delay, and deceieve.

I am working on being patient. Hard to do after so many years.

Thanks bunches!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this telling me at any point the BVA Judges' decision can be over-turned?

The Fast Letter actually proscribes three levels of review for these EEDs and awards over $250,000. First, the rating officer makes a decision. If the decision involves a grant of an effective date 'retroactive eight or more years"'or results in a lump-sum payment of $250,000 or more, then it will be reviewed by the 'Post-Determination team' at the RO. Then it will be reviewed by the RO's Veterans Service Center Manager and finally by the C&P Service in Washington. At any stage of the review process the original decision could be changed. Get a Lawyer..........................

Thanks

Josephine

gdsnide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use