Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Duty Assist

Rate this question


gp747

Question

it is just apparent to me , the rater did not get the whole picture

i do not know whose fault it is , but says i have a year to submit new evidence

how do i know what rater looked at, all info is supposed to have been with claim

did rater ignore all but two hospitalizations . or was the info just not there.

what if info was there and rater ignored it ,i send in same thing they wont

accept it . say they already have it . rater only noted two hospitalisations ,

man i lived in hospitals for a long time. hospitals were my second home. i have got to

figure this out , i am not mad anymore just disappointed at the way they do people

to beat you out of every dime. i am not greedy i would have probably been happy with

50% and left them alone . we got a war going on now i am going to win , the battle ,may

have been lost but the war just began.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

skunk,

This is just my opinion, if the rater placed in writing only two

hospitalizations, then you need to re-submit the other treatment

records. Quote directly from their rating and the page number

etc, showing where they did not list this evidence.

They may be in your file, we don't know. This is exactly the game

the Appeals Management Center played with me.

When all was said and done, I didn't care how many copies they

had in my file. I only counted the ones they acknowledged.

I received a letter back from the Social Worker at my Regional Office

stating the rater considers the evidence they are AWARE that they

have.

What did I do, I re-submitteed the Independent Medical Opinion and

told him to tell the rater to use all the evidence.

Remember that by law the VA is required to evaluate all of the

evidence.

This is VA 101.

§ 4.6 Evaluation of evidence: The element of the weight to be accorded the character of the veteran's service is but one factor entering into the considerations of the rating boards in arriving at determinations of the evaluation of disability. Every element in any way affecting the probative value to be assigned to the evidence in each individual claim must be thoroughly and conscientiously studied by each member of the rating board in the light of the established policies of the Department of Veterans Affairs to the end that decisions will be equitable and just as contemplated by the requirements of the law.

Make sure everything you sent to the VA have it date stamped.

It would not hurt to have your Senator fax this information for you.

The VA does not loose this evidence.

Betty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is what I am basing my CUE on because the VA had a doctor's report in their possession that they did not consider. There is no question the report they did not consider was very relevant. I did not know the VA had not considered my doctor's report until years later. My decision in 1973 was just two pieces of paper. I did not get the kind of decision letters we get now. My decision became final because I did not appeal the 10% I got for being unemployable and incapacitated. The only way you can tell if the VA considered your evidence is if they list it. They don't have to list everything but they have to list relevanat evidence they considered. This seems to leave them a loophole because they decide what is relevant. I think a medical report is relevant, but I bet they will fight me on this and force me to the BVA and then the Court. As long as my lawyer holds out and I keep breathing I will fight. If we lose at the VARO where the error occurred then we go up the chain.

Many here have had great difficulty getting the VA to consider IMO's and other evidence. As Betty has quoted the VA has to consider all the relevant evidence. How do they get away with this robbery of vets when we are supposed to have competent VSO's at our side I do not know. It does not take Perry Mason to see that all the evidence is considered. It can get buried in your C-File and never see the light of day for thirty years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use