Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Brief For Uscavc

Rate this question


rthomass

Question

I need a copy of a brief that anyone has prepared for the United States Court of Appeals For Veterans Claims. I have a copy of how to do it from the CAVC but a working layman copy would be of immense help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Berta just a short memo : 1. I referenced 0ne direct buddy letter and at least four letters that cited use before and after I was there. Of course I used Preismman's Checo report and the Air Force letter to Senator Layne Evans. I developed NHL, Hypertension, problems with my left eye, had a heart operation in July due to a clot the size of a thumb. (This was the result of an implanted in my upper left chest; the probe caused the clot.)

I am going to let Karl proceed to the CAVC; but unfortunately only GOD could win this one.....Yes I am from Louisville, Kentucky where the SOB Parker was a supervisor for the DAV....I did one thing right a few years ago , I fired them.

Betrta, Thank You for allowing me to vent. GOD bless to all

Randall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am an attorney, with no prior experience in USCAVC cases, who is representing a vet on a pro bono basis. My client seeks compensation for diabetes arising from Agent Orange exposure.

Can you provide me any more information, case citation, other information relating to the Alaska vet matter you mention? My client was in Alaska and his matter could be identical to the one you refer to.

Thanks in advance. Since I am new to this Board, I am not sure where replies go to. Should I provide private email address to help with exchange of information?

Randy Holliday

I think there are plenty of good lawyers-for CAVC claims-

I dont have a lawyer so cant really give first hand recommendations.

But successful resolve of any VA claim depends on one main thing-evidence.

I believe this was a AO exposure in Thailand claim-you have- outside of the -so far- DOD documented usage timeframe of AO?

In cases like that- buddy statements can be often only way to prove exposure to AO and also the MOS is taken into consideration.

The Okinawa AO win involved detailed account of the Hayes dispenser etc.

The AO Alaska vet proved he was exposed when the Army sprayed AO around part of the pipeline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Randy:

Welcome to Hadit and thank you for helping a Veteran with their claim. If you develop an interest there is probably a very good business for lawyers to help Veterans cause the VA is so slow a lot of back pay is usually on the table.

Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gee-I might even know the vet who you are representing.We have some Alaska vets as regulars at SVR show-(Stardust Radio) I am hosting the show tomorrow night- check out the promo here)

I have not seen the decision at the BVA web site yet- it was an AMC decision and might not get there at all-

One thing is for sure Randy- these types of AO claims must have proof of direct exposure to Agent Orange.

In the AMC decision the evidence listed was a newspaper article that the US Army Corps of Engineers had used AO along a certain small portion of the Alaskan pipeline.

I discussed this case with one of the lawyers at NVLSP (Rick Spaturo I think) and he was as baffled by it as I was.

There must have been more to the evidence that what the AMC decision held-

I assume (and dont see how this vet succeeded without this)

that the vet proved either by his MOS or by buddy statements (or by both) that he was in direct contact with the AO from the spraying done by the Engineer Corps and that he proved he was there at same time frame- at this specific swath of land near the pipeline.

An Okinawa vet proved he had cleaned the Hayes dispensers- (direct contact with AO- these were the actual sprayers they used)and there are a few other awards at the BVA for AO comp for service and exposure outside of Vietnam and outside of the limited Korea DMZ AO regs.

http://www.mindfully.org/Pesticide/2003/Ag...anks22jun03.htm

The Alaska USA Engineer spraying story is at this above link.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS Randy-could you post your email addy here or in your profile thing?

I have an Alaska Army vet with claim due to AO exposure who has a lot of info he wants to share.

I will send you his phone number-as he has disability which makes email typing difficult.

He knows of the other Alaska vets who have possible AO disabilities.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use