Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Varo Called And Said They Made A Mistake

Rate this question


Rockhound

Question

A rep from my VARO called me today and informed me that they had made a mistake and had not listed one of my secondary conditions, I had listed in my new claim, on the C&P exam I was to be scheduled for. They had already sent out a VCAA letter and a letter saying they were going to schedule a C&P exam, but the exam they had scheduled did not consider this missing secondary condition.

After discussing the error and all, I noted they had also made another error in that they were looking at the claim as a claim for an increase and not as a claim for secondary conditions. The claim was to SC secondary issues as a result of the already SC condition.

The rep said they would be sending me out another letter with the correction in it and that their may not be a need for another C&P, that they will have my previous medical records reviewed by their medical reviewer to see if their is a need for another C&P exam.

This is a first for me, has anyone else had such a call and were able to seemingly get things straightened out? Of course, only time and this new letter will tell me for sure. I can only hope.

Rockhound Rider :lol:

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Rockhound you would think they are walking on pins and needles. The actually helped me a couple of years ago but I still believe it was by accident.

I am absolutely doumbfounded by their omission of making a mistake.

Great Job and I feel you got lucky.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

Was the VARO "rep" your service officer? ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

We occasionally get the few good employees at the VARO's. A note on the claim for increase: Any time a vet is already service connected, and then files another claim, it is considered a claim for increase per M21-1MR. This is true for new and secondary condition claims as well. Just wanted to let you know that this actually isn't a mistake and that they are doing it the right way. :lol:

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ditto on rental's post.

Once a claimant is SC'd for anything, even if it's SC at

zero percent for a single issue, every claim after that is

a claim for increase.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

x

x

x

Was the VARO "rep" your service officer? ~Wings

It was a VARO Rep. The caller ID on my phone was 800-827-1000,

As to a claim that has already been awarded and you are asking for secondary issues, you better make sure they are clear on this or you may spend more time getting it straightened out, if they deny it for an increase. My award's highest rating is only for 10% and a claim for an increase of it would automatically be turned down, unless you can either show that it was rated under the wrong rating/DC or for secondary conditions as a result of the SC Condition. Evidently their is a difference, since the C&P exams are different for an increase v. secondary conditions. If you get the wrong exam, you may be denied and then your stuck in the appeal process or a DRO hearing and hope you can get it corrected there. Even the VARO Rep stated this. Plus my SC fractured nasal bone and deviated septum award is rated as part of the skeletal system and the secondary conditions are chronic sinusitis and Rhinitis due to the obstructed nasal pasages. also I have painful scars on each side of my nose, which are due to the fractured nasa bone, and because I have to wear glasses, the nose pads tend to cause ulcers and subsequent scar tissue over the area where my nasal bone was broken.

The sinusitis and rhinitis will probably be rated as one, but the two scars must be rated seperately which are by rating, only worth 10% each, so if I win my claim, the least I should get would be three 10% awards, which would bring my total to four 10% awards which I believe equates to 30% total.

Rockhound Rider :lol:

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rock,

It's still a claim for increase whether it's based on direct SC or on secondary conditions.

You might want to talk with your Licensed Optician about your eyewear and medical problems

with your nasal bridge.

Your Licensed Optician will be able to help you select an appropriate

eyewear frame with a unifit bridge versus a frame with adjustable nose pads.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use