Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Mh Progress Notes

Rate this question


hurryupnwait

Question

Hi All

In my mental health notes it states.

Axis 1 depression NOS, R/O mood, D/O secondary to GMC,

Anyone have any idea what this means?

Happy Trails

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Depression NOS (not otherwise specified) = a depression diagnosis that doesn't neatly fit into a set of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria.

R/O (rule out) mood, D/O secondary to GMC (general medical condition). This can be interpreted two different ways as written. It can either mean that they are attempting to rule out a diagnosis of mood disorder due to a general medical condition, or that they are attributing your diagnosis of a non-specific depression to a general medical condition. The reason they would do the former is because you meet little or none of the diagnostic criteria for the mood disorder. The reason for the latter would mean that you have several symptoms of the mood disorder, but not enough to give a solid DSM-IV diagnosis.

I would seek clarity from my MH doc on this.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depression NOS (not otherwise specified) = a depression diagnosis that doesn't neatly fit into a set of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria.

R/O (rule out) mood, D/O secondary to GMC (general medical condition). This can be interpreted two different ways as written. It can either mean that they are attempting to rule out a diagnosis of mood disorder due to a general medical condition, or that they are attributing your diagnosis of a non-specific depression to a general medical condition. The reason they would do the former is because you meet little or none of the diagnostic criteria for the mood disorder. The reason for the latter would mean that you have several symptoms of the mood disorder, but not enough to give a solid DSM-IV diagnosis.

I would seek clarity from my MH doc on this.

Here is what the pdoc wrote

Axis 1 depression NOS <..... this is the part I do not understand

R/O mood D/O to GMC <.....

Axis 11 Deferred

Axis 111 Chronic back pain

Axis 1V Moderate

Axis V present GAF 50, Last GAF score: none

Edited by hurryupnwait

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Axis I: same as previous post

Axis II: deferred until a personality disorder presents itself. This is the typical comment entered for this axis if a personality disorder is not present.

Axis III: The general medical condition(s) that you suffer from which contribute to the Axis I diagnosis.

Axis IV: There are moderate psychosocial and environmental factors effecting you. This is not a very good entry for this axis. It is supposed to be specific items such as, recent divorce, death of a spouse/child/parent, financial difficulties, etc.

Axis V: Global assessment of functioning score. A current snapshot of your overall mental health picture. A score of 50 represents Serious symptoms (e.g., suicidal ideation, severe obsessional rituals, frequent shoplifting) OR any serious impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning (e.g., no friends, unable to keep a job). It is one point past the border for moderate symptoms.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

where did your progress notes come from?

From a post graduate 4 th year resident psychiatrist at the VAMC. I got them from the Release of Information office.

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

You got a bonafide Depression going on, and they haven't decided yet if the depression is severe enough to warrant a major depression (mood disorder) diagnosis. At present they are calling it Depression, not major depression, but that could change. This is a compensatable medical condition, are you going to, or have you filed a claim for Depression? ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use