Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Only Two Pages 1971 Claim

Rate this question


gp747

Question

i filed a claim in 1971 and can only find two pages in my c-file one

is the denial and the other is some sort of diagnoses from va hospital

with a diagnoses of schizophrenic reaction schizo affective type and

alcohol addiction.

on the denial they ignored everything else but the alcohol and said was

due to own misconduct . how do you be schizo by your own will i think

i have reason to challenge this decision and have it vacated.

when i filed the claim was for nervous condition was not appealed at that

time. i later many years filed claim for same thing was denied and sent to

appeals denied there also.

i was homeless the first time and in a very unstable state the second time

and did not know laws about this stuff did not follow up did not know was

even being appealed.i have claims at varo now and will wait on outcome

but need to get prepared for any legal fight in case i am denied.

also when i was hospitalized in vietnam doctors made sure

on diagnoses was not due to own misconduct.

Lifting the Stay of Secondary claims for Alcohol and Drug abuse disabilities

What the Federal Circuit held in Allen

In Allen v. Principi, 237 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2001), rehearing en banc denied, 268 F.3d 1340 (2001), the Federal Circuit found that 38 U.S.C. § 1110 permits a veteran to receive compensation for an alcohol-abuse or drug-abuse disability acquired as secondary to, or as a symptom of, a veteran’s service-connected disability. According to the Federal Circuit, section 1110 precludes compensation only in two situations: 1) for primary alcohol abuse disabilities; and 2) for secondary disabilities (such as cirrhosis of the liver) that result from primary alcohol abuse. The Federal Circuit defined “primary” as meaning an alcohol abuse disability arising during service from voluntary and willful drinking to excess.

Prospects for further litigation on Allen

A petition was filed at the Federal Circuit to request that the full court (en banc) rehear the Allen case. This rehearing request was denied. General Counsel has since worked with Compensation and Pension Service and the Department of Justice to determine the feasibility of appealing this case to the Supreme Court. The Department of Justice ultimately decided not to pursue further litigation.

The effect of this decision on the stay

Since the Allen litigation is now complete, the stay of these claims is immediately lifted. Adjudicating cases under the Allen decision means that veterans can obtain compensation for alcohol or drug-abuse related disabilities where the substance abuse is secondary to a service connected condition, such as a mental disorder. In addition, substance abuse may be a symptom of worsening of a service-connected condition resulting in a higher rating for that condition. It is up to the decision maker to determine whether an alcohol or drug abuse disability is actually caused by a service-connected disability.

All inquiries on filing or reopening a claim for the above mentioned disabilities should be directed to your County Veterans Service Office or to the Dept. of WI. VFW State Service Officer.

what i need to know is could it affect my 1971 claim

Edited by skunk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Me, you and Rockhound have similar cases. Back in the 60's and 70's the VA rating decisions were a joke. I got a two page decision as well with no appeal rights or even a C&P exam. They just rated me on my military record and my two week stay in a VA hospital in 1972. I think some organization filed on my behalf while I was in the nuthouse. I don't remember. I had also filed for a discharge upgrade. I was kicked out for being a PD and then the VA decided I was schizophrenic, but only 10% even though I could not work at the time. I spent two months in a military hospital after Vietnam for observation and drug abuse. I was not a drug addict at that time, but I was acting pretty crazy. I took drugs to self medicate. I just felt like a ping pong ball. I was being batted around and I was batting myself around and did not know how to stop it.

i did not know a was filed in my behalf i do vaguely remember talking to some

guy from dav and they atre the ones listed as who filed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when i won my 30% bi-polar after fighting since 1971 off and on and living

a life of hell ,if they just would have been fair and rated me 50% i would havve

rested my case , even though i believe i would easily qualify for a 100% rating.

if they would have just met me half way ,i would have been satisfied . as i have said i am not looking for the jackpot or something i do not deserve. but looks like now i

will be at their heels until a very old age and even possibly after i am dead.

tying up the courts and bogging down the process and they wonder why they

cant get anything done . they make their own problems and it compounds

it for vets trying to get a claim through because of trying to beat someone out of a dime.i am set for the long haul and hope i can find an attorney who will fight

for me and go as high as the highest court as necessary.this need not be , but they bring it on themselves while we suffer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i am excited about this new information delta and berta brought up about

groves v. peake i know i have a legal option some where on my case and

i am going to have to have a lawyer to do this. i have pending claims at ro

but havve been touching base with lawyers . i want the ro claims to go through first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i thought psychosis was presumptive i have been diagnosed in 1971 paranoia schizophrenia schizo-affective type and now bi-polar and understand these

diagnoses fit under pyschosis evaluation wikipedia i am posting ,looked up psychosis

in wikipedia . appears all are the same.

Causes

Causes of symptoms of mental illness were customarily classified as "organic" or "functional". Organic conditions were primarily medical or pathophysiological, whereas, functional conditions are primarily psychiatric or psychological. The DSM-IV-TR no longer classifies psychotic disorders as functional or organic. Rather it lists traditional psychotic illnesses, psychosis due to General Medical conditions, and Substance induced psychosis.

[edit] Psychiatric

Functional causes of psychosis include the following:

A psychotic episode can be significantly affected by mood. For example, people experiencing a psychotic episode in the context of depression may experience persecutory or self-blaming delusions or hallucinations, while people experiencing a psychotic episode in the context of mania may form grandiose delusions.

Stress is known to contribute to and trigger psychotic states. A history of psychologically traumatic events, and the recent experience of a stressful event, can both contribute to the development of psychosis. Short-lived psychosis triggered by stress is known as brief reactive psychosis, and patients may spontaneously recover normal functioning within two weeks.[15] In some rare cases, individuals may remain in a state of full-blown psychosis for many years, or perhaps have attenuated psychotic symptoms (such as low intensity hallucinations) present at most times.

Sleep deprivation has been linked to psychosis.[22][23][24] However, this is not a risk for most people, who merely experience hypnagogic or hypnopompic hallucinations, i.e. unusual sensory experiences or thoughts that appear during waking or drifting off to sleep. These are normal sleep phenomena and are not considered signs of psychosis.[25]

Vitamin B12 deficiency can also cause symptoms of mania and psychosis.[26][27]

[<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Psychosis&action=edit&section=9" title="Edit section: General medical">edit] General medical

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use