Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Should My Next Step Be?

Rate this question


Dave

Question

I just received my rating letter and the VA service connected my peripheral neuropathy (upper and lower) but both at 0 %. I provided a letter (sent certified and received) from my doctor that stated within the letter that my PN was moderate incomplete paralysis, but the rating decision says it is not even mild. However, the rating DOES NOT list the letter from my doctor as evidence used and does not reference it in their decision. I fully believe the rater never saw it, but they had it over a month before the rating. What should I do? A NOD for DRO review and state the rater did not consider medical evidence? This really frustrates me that they did not consider the medical evidence my doctor provided and now will further delay my disability claim. Please help.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If it were me I would take copies of the evidence and go the the VARO and make sure that they had it in my C File.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had this happen to me a while back I was denied for something don't remmeber but I looked in the evidence thing and they did not have my doctor's letter listed so I sent it in again with a NOD and they approved it.

You have to really read a denial almost better than an award to make sure they got evrything BECAUSE if it aint listed they did noe consider it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Dave

I would NOD it based on them not considering your evidence. How the heck can you tell if they reviewed your evidence if they do not even list it? Some at the VA say that if it is in your C-File then the VA considered it, but that seems like bs to me. If the decision does not list or mention your evidence at all they must have ignored it or never even looked at it. What other logical conclusion can you have.

You know I have a CUE based on this very point. The VA has been pulling this stunt for years not listing all evidence they don't like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My service officer is checking with the rating supervior over this. I know they didn't look at the 2nd doctor's letter. I provided two doctor's letter's within 2 months. They referenced the first but did not reference the one in which the doctor stated my condition. Under the heading "EVIDENCE" , the first letter listed, 2nd letter not. In "Reasons for Decision" , again the first doctor's report I submitted is referenced, the 2nd not.

It is either 1 of 2 things: the letter never made it in front of the rater OR the rater ignored it. I have the green postal form stamped delivered a full month before the rating on the 2nd letter. I also have an IRIS response that said the letter would be provided to the rater as well. The letter was so critical, I wanted to make sure they got it.

Also, if the VA had relevant medical evidence like my physician's letter and did not consider it, is it a CUE? I believe that if this letter was considered, a reasonable rater would have made the rating compensatable.

Thanks for your help!

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A CUe is not in order here unless your rep asks the VA to CUE themselves-

I suggest that the rep help you prepare a Reconsideration Request unless he gets somewhere with the rating supervisor.

This will NOT stop the year NOD deadline- and the NOD must be filed if VA fails to act on this request as the NOD deadline grows close.

I hope you IMos fully cover all the criteria that these IMos need.

In your case the medical evidence that would warrant a compensable rating for the PN has to be strongly stated with a full medical rationale.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Berta,

My service rep found the letter with the Triage team who admitted they failed to get it to the rater. They mentioned something about being "short staffed" during November. My rep drafted a reconsideration letter because he said the evidence was still within 30 days of the rating. He told me to hand in there despite their error. The letter is strong as the doctor clearly stated the effects of the PN. It just frustrates me that the VA failed to forward the letter to the rating board as I was told and asrequired. As far as a NOD, I have until this December to file that -- I hope I won't have to.

Thanks to all for your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use