Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Working On A Nexus Letter For Secondary Conditions

Rate this question


hurryupnwait

Question

Here is the 1st draft, but I want a draft ready for tomorrow when I see the neurologist.

In my medical opinion, the currently existing medical diagnosis of

_______________________________________________________________is

___ due to (100% sure);

___ more likely than not (greater than 50%); related to

___ at least as likely as not (equal to or greater than 50%); related to and

___ not at least as likely as not (less than 50%) related to

The service connected condition of __________________________

Medical rationale _________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

Signature and Title of Practitioner Date

Any input

Thanks

Paul

Edited by hurryupnwait

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Paul, remind me please, is this in support of an original claim, or did you receive an SOC or SSOC denying the claim, and you're asking for reconsideration or appealing it to the Board?

If it's in response to an SOC or SSOC, have the doc item by item address the reasons and bases in the decision, in addition to providing his own rationale.

In any case, have the doc review the rating criteria in 38 CFR for the condition you're claiming, so he can see specifically what is needed at each percentage level. Then, he can address that level and why he believes you fit the criteria.

I like the brevity of your form, but it might need to be expanded just a bit to accomodate addressing rating criteria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VAF is right- the SOC or SSOC will contain the VA's own medical rationale and the IMO will have to overcome the VA opinion with better and stronger medical rationale.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul, remind me please, is this in support of an original claim, or did you receive an SOC or SSOC denying the claim, and you're asking for reconsideration or appealing it to the Board?

If it's in response to an SOC or SSOC, have the doc item by item address the reasons and bases in the decision, in addition to providing his own rationale.

In any case, have the doc review the rating criteria in 38 CFR for the condition you're claiming, so he can see specifically what is needed at each percentage level. Then, he can address that level and why he believes you fit the criteria.

I like the brevity of your form, but it might need to be expanded just a bit to accomodate addressing rating criteria.

My objective is to get a C&P exam for several secondary issues that I would like have related to my service connected condition. I am not responding to a SOC or SSOC.

I m not sure if I need to get this doctor involved in reading the rating criteria for each condition, he prolly will not want to get that involved. I m interested in him/her making the connection of a current medical diagnosis to my SC, that may have the VA send me to C&P exam, that is where I think I should have the rating criteria in my hand to discuss with him/ her.

Happy Trails

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If your doctor's letter is good enough you may not need a C&P exam. I got two conditions SC'ed as secondary without a c&p exam. My VA doctor wrote me a letter and bingo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your doctor's letter is good enough you may not need a C&P exam. I got two conditions SC'ed as secondary without a c&p exam. My VA doctor wrote me a letter and bingo.

So maybe it would be better to ask the doctor to use my format as an outline to write a letter? Should the rating criteria be in the outline?

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Paul, don't overthink it. They don't necessarily need a rational, just a nexus. The nexus letter in my signature will and has worked just fine for me and several other vets. All you have to do is print it off, fill it out, and have the doc check the most appropriate box and sign it. Then send it in. :rolleyes:

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use