Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tinnititus

Rate this question


5of7Vets

Question

i am new to the sight and wanted to express Wow to the vast amout of knowledge that is posted to this web site. We have lots of Veterans here in OK that are trying to work this process. Yes i have passed it on.

my first experience:

Applied for Tinnitus and BiLateral hearing loss, well long story short VA disapproved both claims. Ok i waited awhile and then reread the denial for Tinnitus which stated, "your personal medical records showed you played trumpet in a swing band". True i do but what i know now is i forgot to state i played in the Drum & Bugle Corp at Lackland for 5 weeks and using their horns. We played at retreats, parades, and San Antonio's 150 yr celebration.

Question: I provided a NOD per my Veteran support org and provided the certificate of playing in their band. Are my chances any better at getting Tinnitus overturned? I now sleep with a white noise device and have sent doctor statement back to VA also stating Tinnitus.

Still new to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

welcome jeff,

glad you finally made it over here.there will someone along shortly to help you out.

jim

<b>for sale.....1 used veteran.slightly broken.

understands very little when it comes to regulations.

please be gentle.housebroken</b> <b>,growls

but does not bite</b>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i am new to the sight and wanted to express Wow to the vast amout of knowledge that is posted to this web site. We have lots of Veterans here in OK that are trying to work this process. Yes i have passed it on.

my first experience:

Applied for Tinnitus and BiLateral hearing loss, well long story short VA disapproved both claims. Ok i waited awhile and then reread the denial for Tinnitus which stated, "your personal medical records showed you played trumpet in a swing band". True i do but what i know now is i forgot to state i played in the Drum & Bugle Corp at Lackland for 5 weeks and using their horns. We played at retreats, parades, and San Antonio's 150 yr celebration.

Question: I provided a NOD per my Veteran support org and provided the certificate of playing in their band. Are my chances any better at getting Tinnitus overturned? I now sleep with a white noise device and have sent doctor statement back to VA also stating Tinnitus.

Still new to this.

5 of 7, Welcome to hadit. I am rated at 10% for tinnitus. What was your job in the military? Were you around jets, turbines, any occupational noise hazards?? What does your Dr's statement indicate? Does it provide a nexus to anything your encountered during your service. Sorry for the questions, but we need a little info on the background of how you acquired tinnitus. Any mention of hearing problems while in the service in your service medical records?

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was your job in the military? Printer system operator, (diddy bot)

Were you around jets, turbines, any occupational noise hazards?? Negative just printers and radio noise, wore headsets 8hrs a day.

What does your Dr's statement indicate? I will have to get it later

Does it provide a nexus to anything your encountered during your service. When we filled was not even aware of Nexus, however my Audiologist did state "it is as likely as not" that the gun fire at Lackland created this. I was a city boy and never had weapons of any sort.

Any mention of hearing problems while in the service in your service medical records? I only had one exam in 1978 in which everything had a line through it. No exit exam of any sort and yes i have my medical records. My next job was with Dept of Defense and they required a hearing test showing in 1980 i had a hearing loss. I understand it is almost impossible to get hearing but the ringing in one hearing impedes my ability to sleep so the white noise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

You have what you need to get your claim approved! Your audiologist statement might need a little tweaking..make sure he or she states these EXACT WORDS, "Veterans hearing loss most likely as a result of military service" (such as "gunfire at Lackland").

My hearing loss was declined by the Cleveland Regional Office and declined again by the decision review officer. The BVA, however, weighed most heavily on the audiologists opinion, and not the unsubstantiated guess of the rating specialist. This is why we Vets say that the VARO has rubber stamps of "claim denied".

There has to be compelling evidence to overturn your audiologists opinion. A rating specialists opinion that has never tested your hearing is NOT that compelling evidence. They would have to order TWO comp and pension audio exams and both of the audiologists state to the effect that your music caused the hearing loss, and not the military, in order to "overturn" your audiologists opinion. The reason it would take TWO is because your lawyer can argue to "favor the Veteran" rule..if 2 docs offer differing opinions, the rule says they must accept the opinion most favorable to the Veteran. It is called "the doctrine of equipose"...if you can prove there is a 50/50 chance it happened, then regulations require the Veteran be given the benefit of the doubt. However, be careful, because if your doc says "hearing loss may have been caused by military service" it will be declined, because that is speculative, and benefits are not awarded on "maybe" something happened.

You audiologist is your friend and they hooked you up. It is Very difficult to get some of them to say that..even if it is true.

I recommend you carefully prepare a "Statement in Support of Claim" ..for your appeal. Explain why your hearing loss was caused by the military..(you shot guns at Lackland and played the trumpet in the military band..you also listened every day to loud printer system noises..if that is the case) Also explain why it was not caused with your civilian career. For example, if you worked in an office as a civilian that was much quieter room than your military printer job, state so! You may also explain things like, none of your family members suffer hearing loss, etc, etc.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, i know from what i have read that it is tough..

Here are the words she used: The diagnosis for this patient is binaural hearing loss and tinnitus. After reviewing the veteran's service history it is just as likely as not that at least some of the veterans hearing loss and tinnitus are the result of his exposure to hazardous noise while in the service.

The ringing and hearing loss is prevelant in my left ear only and to date am wearing a hearing aid in that ear.

Word recognition - recorded maryland CNC Word lists 88% @ 55db HL in the right ear and 90% @ 70db Hl in the left...

You have what you need to get your claim approved! Your audiologist statement might need a little tweaking..make sure he or she states these EXACT WORDS, "Veterans hearing loss most likely as a result of military service" (such as "gunfire at Lackland").

My hearing loss was declined by the Cleveland Regional Office and declined again by the decision review officer. The BVA, however, weighed most heavily on the audiologists opinion, and not the unsubstantiated guess of the rating specialist. This is why we Vets say that the VARO has rubber stamps of "claim denied".

There has to be compelling evidence to overturn your audiologists opinion. A rating specialists opinion that has never tested your hearing is NOT that compelling evidence. They would have to order TWO comp and pension audio exams and both of the audiologists state to the effect that your music caused the hearing loss, and not the military, in order to "overturn" your audiologists opinion. The reason it would take TWO is because your lawyer can argue to "favor the Veteran" rule..if 2 docs offer differing opinions, the rule says they must accept the opinion most favorable to the Veteran. It is called "the doctrine of equipose"...if you can prove there is a 50/50 chance it happened, then regulations require the Veteran be given the benefit of the doubt. However, be careful, because if your doc says "hearing loss may have been caused by military service" it will be declined, because that is speculative, and benefits are not awarded on "maybe" something happened.

You audiologist is your friend and they hooked you up. It is Very difficult to get some of them to say that..even if it is true.

I recommend you carefully prepare a "Statement in Support of Claim" ..for your appeal. Explain why your hearing loss was caused by the military..(you shot guns at Lackland and played the trumpet in the military band..you also listened every day to loud printer system noises..if that is the case) Also explain why it was not caused with your civilian career. For example, if you worked in an office as a civilian that was much quieter room than your military printer job, state so! You may also explain things like, none of your family members suffer hearing loss, etc, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use