Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Has Anyone Received An Increase Based Off Of New Evidence Only?

Rate this question


pilgrim01

Question

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Pilgrim,

This is my experience, and could be totally diferent than everyone else's. The only thing they used my medical evidence was for service connection. After that, everything was based soley off the C&P exam. Now, once again in my case, I recieved the wrong C&P exam(it was for a different condition then the condition I actually have). I've requested a new C&P exam, but the VA doesn't want to send me to one. It's more efficient for them to base everything off an invalid C&P exam.

So here's my outlook. If the C&P exam you already recieved was favorable for them, then you probably wont have another C&P exam for those conditions. Unless, you request an increase. If you put in a claim for increase, they have to give you a new C&P exam.

I'm sure other people on here will be more helpful then me. Also, like I said, this has been my experience.

Tyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, I have recieved increase and no new c&p exam. My records, va doc and private doc clinical records supported the 'increased' change in my condition. I have also been denied on the same principle without a c&p for claimed increased sc disability.

I do not have the specific reg's just now, but I don't recall if the va is required to give a new c&p.

Best to ya,

Cg'up2009!

So here's my outlook. If the C&P exam you already recieved was favorable for them, then you probably wont have another C&P exam for those conditions. Unless, you request an increase. If you put in a claim for increase, they have to give you a new C&P exam.

I'm sure other people on here will be more helpful then me. Also, like I said, this has been my experience.

Tyler

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clarification Cowgirl, your wonderful.

You know, I was just about to point out(was sitting thinking about it). That I'm probably the exception here. For one, my condition isn't based off x-rays, mri's, ect.

Also, I'm not sure why they wont send me to a new C&P exam, nor will they disregard the invalid C&P exam I recieved. I should have said that my case is a lot different, and that I am the exception here.

Pilgrim, you'll start to see, as I'm sure you already have, that there are a lot of very knowledgable people on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I have discovered that livingrock.

Cowgirl, thanks!

I was just wondering whem I file the "request for reconsideration" or NOD (havn't decided yet), if they will base it off my current X-rays and MRIs or will they send me back to the doc? All the X-rays and MRIs were done in the last month and I have copies of each. I just received my award rating on Saturday. I'm at 40% and I feel I need to be atleast 50.

Edited by pilgrim01
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I got an increase for a heart problem from 0% to 60% and I did not get another C&P exam. I got a lot of tests between the 0% rating and the 60% rating. I got the 60% rating based on my appeal of the 0% rating. This was the result of a DRO Hearing. I have gotten SC'ed for conditions without ever getting a C&P exam. It was based on my medical evidence via the VA's medical records. If you have good evidence in your VA medical records you can sometimes get and increase or SC without a C&P exam. It does not happen all the time but it is possible. I think for mental conditions they almost always want an initial C&P exam but on appeal you can get an increase without another C&P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'll have to file a Request for Reconsideration with the X-rays and MRIs and see what happens.....

Now, since I am at 40% (30, 10), how do they re-calculate? Let's say they give me 20% more, do they calculate 40% and the new 20% or do the do the whole calculation over (30, 10, and now 20). I know they start high and go lower for the numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use