Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Chronic Pain Syndrome And Depression

Rate this question


foleyj

Question

Since this is my first post I will give a brief background. As you can see from the profile I have been rated at 60% for my SCD's, here is the breakdown;

20%-SCD for lower back injury, annular tear and herniation L4-L5

20%-SCD for weakness, pain and numbness or right leg

20%-SCD right shoulder, torn capsule

20%-SCD left shoulder, torn capsule

I also have right and left hip bursitis secondary to the back injury that I submitted a claim for but was denied because of lack of evidence. I am also being treated for depression that started after I began receiving my disability benefits. I recently obtained documentation from my Ortho stating that the hip pain is related to my back injury. So that is something that I am going to resubmit to the VA as new evidence since it was denied previously. I also went to my psychiatrist and he filled out the nexus letter stating that the depression was possibly related to the chronic pain syndrome related to my injuries. My question is how do I proceed with the my claim as far as the depression? Should I claim depression and chronic pain syndrome, or should I claim as a separate disability? This is the first time that I have obtained documentation that diagnosis chronic pain syndrome. Also, can the psychiatrist diagnose chronic pain syndrome? Any guidance would be appreciated.

Jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Gotta go with John on this.... here are the choices you want to give Doc

More than Likely

Likely

As likely as not

...

(bad options to give doc but hey)

less than likely

unlikely

You really are shooting for at LEAST - "As Likely as Not"... then the claim wieght swings in your favor anything less than that, and you sunk my battleship ok?

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice and information. I went back to the doc and he changed it from possibly related to to related to on the form. I will let you know how it goes with the claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused (as usual).

A rating for a major depressive disorder that is secondary to the chronic pain of my service connected disability---and--- the (9422) Pain disorder##

Are these two separate ratings: 1. service connection for pain disorder of the constant pain of my s/c disability??

2. service connection for major depressive disorder that is secondary to s/c disability??

(?) So if someone is suffering severe depression from chronic pain, do they file and request s/c for the "pain disorder" or for "depression" due to pain, or both??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I'm confused (as usual).

A rating for a major depressive disorder that is secondary to the chronic pain of my service connected disability---and--- the (9422) Pain disorder##

Are these two separate ratings: 1. service connection for pain disorder of the constant pain of my s/c disability??

2. service connection for major depressive disorder that is secondary to s/c disability??

(?) So if someone is suffering severe depression from chronic pain, do they file and request s/c for the "pain disorder" or for "depression" due to pain, or both??

MDD - Major Depressive Disorder

and

the 9422 Pain Disorder

are two separate diagnosis and as such can be filed for separately, BUT, when the rater rates your disability, they will more or less combine the two, for you will only receive ONE percentage rating for "mental disorders".

If you have medical diagonosis of both these disorders then you would want to file for both, 1. just in case they should deny one of them, 2. just in case they will award a larger percentage in the chance that they DO award for both disorders (under the umbrella of the singular mental disorder basket).

Obviously, having said that, you do have to have a "nexus" statement from your MD, PA, NP, stating that the depression is "more likely than not" "at least as likely" "likely" "caused by" "aggravated by", your chronic pain due to SC'd disability.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I have chronic pain disorder and other emotional things. The VA just rolls it into a ball and gives you one rating on the worst mental condition you have. Many of us have things like depression, PTSD, anxiety disorder etc. The VA gives you one rating for all, but since having more than one problem makes the whole picture worse you should get a higher rating overall. Now some people with emotional disorders are 100% for just one diagnosis, but have others that are really not rated individually. One thing to remember is if you have something like chronic pain disorder and depression or PTSD then it is unlikely that your condition will improve because these things feed off each other, and one condition makes the other worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use