Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tbi

Rate this question


MrPain7

Question

I am service connected 100% for seizure disorder since 1984, recently I was looking thru my

VA medical records in 2005 and several times after it was stated seizure disorder secondary to

TBI which it had not been diagnosed or mentioned earlier, When I filed for epilepsy in 1975

it was recorded in my medical records that i was thrown from a trunk with head and back

injury on active duty. My Question is this: If my seizure disorder is now being

diagnosed as secondary to TBI should irequest service connection for TBI ???

I am protected under the 20 year rule i don't feel it would hurt my ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The thing is would it help your rating any at all. If you are already 100% for a disorder why bother to just get the SC reason changed to something else that won't affect the money in your pocket. If if is a brain type disorder you only get one rating for it no matter how many conditions you may have. What you might want to look at is some kind of special monthly compensation if you are housebound or need assistence in your daily life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

What do you mean when you say you are protected under the 20 year rule? What rule is that? Can someone please explain and post what regulation states this.

Thanks!

Read this code it should explain:

U.S.C. TITLE 38,110

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if it would help to have the tbi SC in your case for comp purposes. I suppose it depends on what other conditions or residuals you have.

Conditions resulting from tbi do have seperate ratings now. I'm sure the seizure disorder will remain the same with it's own rating.

Current law and diagnostic criteria has changed for tbi so it could be benificial to seek service connection. But I couldn't give sound advice without knowing more. I suggest going to the tbi section of this forum and reading about it. There are links there to help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am service connected 100% for seizure disorder since 1984, recently I was looking thru my

VA medical records in 2005 and several times after it was stated seizure disorder secondary to

TBI which it had not been diagnosed or mentioned earlier, When I filed for epilepsy in 1975

it was recorded in my medical records that i was thrown from a trunk with head and back

injury on active duty. My Question is this: If my seizure disorder is now being

diagnosed as secondary to TBI should irequest service connection for TBI ???

I am protected under the 20 year rule i don't feel it would hurt my ratings.

Mr. Pain,

You posted that you are SC'd 100% for seizure disorder since 1984.

A 100 % rating for seizures requires:

General Rating Formula for Major and Minor Epileptic Seizures:Averaging at least 1 major seizure per month over the last year100

I am aslo SC'd for seizure disorder.

Does your Neurologist have any explanation for why you are unable to

have better control of your seizures ?

There are a few reason I feel it maybe in your best interest to continue

researching and considering filing a claim for TBI.

These maybe just some possibilities and I have no idea if any or all of them could apply to you.

With a grant for TBI - you maybe eliglble for additional benefits, such as:

1) SMC benefits

2) Aid and Attendence benefits

3) Housebound Benefits

4) Speciall adapted housing benefits

5) Automotive equipment benefits

6) DIC for surviving spouse or dependents

Say if your death is not directly contributed to a seizure -

but was directly contributed to (medically) TBI.

I am not familiar at all with rules for DIC - perhaps your family's benefits would

already be protected due to your SC'd seizure rating protected at 20 years SC at 100%.

In reading your post, these are the things that came to my mind.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use