Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Army Medical Retirement Question

Rate this question


Signal6

Question

I have a question for anyone that knows about the military medical retirement system.

In 2005 I was injuried in an explosion in Iraq. I am in the Army Reserves and was released from active duty in Jan 2006 after returning from Iraq. I was recently diagnosised with TBI and failed the TBI testing at the VA. My question is, since I am still in the Reserves would I have a case to seek medical retirement from the Army and if so how do you go about it?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

well sorry to hear about the TBI. First off you don't seek medical retirement. You have to be sent by your unit becuase you are UNFIT for duty to a MEB (medical evaluation board aka independent military doctor), which then does an assessment if you are able to stay in military. they then forward their evaluation to the PEB (physical evalutation board). It's made up fo 3 memebers, who look at your enitre file, inlcuding VA stuff, whic you must submit. They make a decision, and if found to be 30`% of more by that then you are medically retired If you are found less then 30% then you are medically separated with a 1 time lump sum payment. if 30% or more by military, not VA, then paid on percetnage of pay (a lot more to answer on that, if you get to that point then re-ask on that subject).

Semper Fidelis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Sounds like you need to decide if you want out or not and if you do start the ball rolling by asking and submitting medical evidence.

Good Luck'

I think Medical retirement is better than most of the stuff offered and the hardest to get. Maybe even harder than VA

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure about this "medically retired" term. I got med boarded for a broken hip rated at 30% and they gave me a lump sum and gave me base privileges for a year and I lost that. Once I filed my VA claim, I had to payback the lump sum, which sucked. Sooo...I would not take the lump sum. Paying it back took a long time.

You know, they should let disabled vets keep their base privileges. It would help me a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

above 30% is now considered full retirement and is paid in monthly installments like a va disability and they receive full retiree benefits. If a person takes the lump sum, then they get the check and the boot, sad state.....

" The enemy controls everything, the roads, the bombs, they even own when and where they will attack. But the second they make the mistake to attack, we own them" ME, reference to insurgents in Iraq

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to run away with signal6's thread, but should I be eligible for base privileges then? Am I considered "medically retired then? I can hardly walk a block without almost collapsing and I can't get disabled vet license plates because I'm not rated 100%. I'm pretty independent, regardless of pain, mainly because I hate feeling like I always need help. I still haven't accepted my disability i guess. Probably like every other disabled vet, I always feel like I get shafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant determine by the info here if you are eligible for CRDP or CRSC.

You might want to check those programs out-

CRDP Concurrent Receipt of Disability Payment and CRSC Combat Related Special Compensation

They should be explained here in the search feature, also at Mil.com and at DOD DFAS site

I cant determine by the info here if you are eligible for CRDP or CRSC.

You might want to check those programs out-

CRDP Concurrent Receipt of Disability Payment and CRSC Combat Related Special Compensation

They should be explained here in the search feature, also at Mil.com and at DOD DFAS site

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use