Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Finally, Personality Disorder, Inadequate Type Rebutted?

Rate this question


Rockhound

Question

As more than some of you know, I have been kicking around the idea that the personality disorder, inadequate type I was saddled with in 1974 by a C&P examiner and wrongfully used as a alternative diagnosis to a psychotic episode I had while in the service, by a VARO Ratings Officer.

Now, nearly 35 yrs later, I have finally been diagnosed with a post traumatic cognitive personality disorder or rather DSM IV (DC) 310.1 Personality Change Due to a General Medical Condition, as a result of the cerebral concussion with frontal lobe involvement.

This new News comes way to late for an EED I believe, since I can't use it to claim an error in 1974, but it does help me now to finally rebutt the prior diagnosis of the personality disorder, inadequate type.

My question is, the psychotic episode in 1974 was diagnosed as an Acute Schizophrenic Episode, in remission, demonstrating moderate impairment to social and industrial adaptability. It is apparent from the records that the residuals demonstrated were never considered in lue of the wrongful diagnosis of the personality disorder. Can this be the last prong of a CUE claim showing how I was monitarily deprived of VA benefits and compensation?

I'm as sure as I can be that I can show the other parts of CUE. This last part has had me in a quandry for some time now. Not that it helps my CUE claim any but the revisions over the years for the DSM has DSM IV (DC) 9205 as Schizophreia, Residual Type, Other and Unspecified Types as per 38 CFR 4.130 Schedule of Ratings-Mental Disorders.

Rockhound Rider :huh:

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

I believe that, the 1974 VA Adjudication of his Claim for a psychiatric disability which severed his 0% service-connection was CUE. ~Wings

Once service connection has been granted, the award of service connection will be severed only where evidence establishes that the original grant of service connection was clearly and unmistakably erroneous, and only after certain procedural safeguards have been met (38 CFR 3.105(d)).

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wings: LoL :unsure: Your preaching to the chior of one, me. I've been saying this ever since I came on line with hadit. I've always had the problem with rebutting the personality disorder that the VA Rater used as an alternative/correction of the psychiatric disorder. Now with this new evidence, I'll be able to finally rebutt those findings, which had no evidence to support it in the first place, but you know the VA, deny, deny until you die.

Rockhound Rider :blink:

I believe that, the 1974 VA Adjudication of his Claim for a psychiatric disability which severed his 0% service-connection was CUE. ~Wings

Once service connection has been granted, the award of service connection will be severed only where evidence establishes that the original grant of service connection was clearly and unmistakably erroneous, and only after certain procedural safeguards have been met (38 CFR 3.105(d)).

Edited by Rockhound

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoppy- this is something I am presenting to the Chairman of H VAC this month-since he doesn't have to help with my claim.

I have griped about these C & Ps for years and need to do something aggressive about it-

I have had numerous C & Ps done for claims since my husband died and they all were deficient.They are prime facie evidence that reflects what so many of you put up with- and it is completely unfair.

The problem with a PD diagnosis is- to combat it-

there must be a diagnosis that rules out PD and defines the disability a different way.

This involves the original med recs for the PD diagnosis and a medical opinion from a real doctor who can assess the entire clinical record and support findings with full rationale that the PD diagnosis was medically incorrect.

It has been done.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When you go for your C&P exam and the doctor tries to lead you back to your childhood, teenage years, family situation you can bet that he is searching for a way to find reasons to make a PD diangosis. If like a million other guys with mental health problems you admit to using alcohol or drugs that is one more reason the doctor has to come up with (PD) drug dependent personality, or anti-social personality. You only realize these things after you have been screwed. Military doctors used to just slam you with PD and then you get kicked out and have a hell of a time getting compensation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Rock, is what Wings posted true? they severed your 1974 psych disability? Well now its seems like you have a 'firm' diagnosis for treatment and compensation. I am so glad you are here at Hadit, plugging along to get whats due, even overdue for all those years.

Don't recall if you have a vso helping. Whats their understanding for a CUE? for the record, when I mentioned CUE at vso's office, everything went stone silent. Instead of Cue, went for increase with eed; that worked.

John, You said the truth here. My initial c&p exam was a horrible experience. The whole thing caused, causes me depression and anxiety to this day. The exam was way back when before I found Hadit. If there was a way after all these years to 'discredit' the hurtful comments and skewed exam notes, I would do it in a heartbeat. (childhood, teenage years, family, did yer Mama love ya, etc.)

Shivers - although my diagnosis with PD was assigned within 12 months after discharge, I would have been better served by the VA to be treated for the MH conditions identified in my SMRs. Odd, not a single MH condition listed was PD! Go figger!

Sure wish I could warn other veterans of how the PD diagnosis slews much needed medical help and benefits. Really, in my opinion families, lives and marriages could be saved, salvaged or treated for more 'definitive' diagnosis than a PD onesizefitsall special.

A true waste of my time, the VA's money in hiring the 'Dr.' and accepting a report that has no meaning - no future treatment recommendation - no help for what ails the veteran and thier family. If the VA wanted to help a veteran get or stay healthy enough to be productive citizen, then WHY doesn't a veteran have a comment page for each and every compensation examination? To answer my question, probably be a bias against truthful feelings on how it went. No compensation then, ha.

best to ya,

cg'up2009!

When you go for your C&P exam and the doctor tries to lead you back to your childhood, teenage years, family situation you can bet that he is searching for a way to find reasons to make a PD diangosis. If like a million other guys with mental health problems you admit to using alcohol or drugs that is one more reason the doctor has to come up with (PD) drug dependent personality, or anti-social personality. You only realize these things after you have been screwed. Military doctors used to just slam you with PD and then you get kicked out and have a hell of a time getting compensation.

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rock, is what Wings posted true? Not sure, they severed your 1974 psych disability? but if I left the Navy with a diagnosis and it was given a 0%, then yes they did. Well now its seems like you have a 'firm' diagnosis for treatment and compensation. I am so glad you are here at Hadit, plugging along to get whats due, even overdue for all those years.

Don't recall if you have a vso helping. Whats their understanding for a CUE? for the record, when I mentioned CUE at vso's office, everything went stone silent. (DITTO!) Instead of Cue, went for increase with eed; that worked. Even the people at the VARO look at you funny, you can just see the wheels turning in their heads wondering what you mean. LoL :unsure:

Cowgirl, I started anew with my claim actions in 2004, first thing I did was apply for a NSC pension so I would have some money coming in, then I applied for SSDI and got that. I couldn't get anywhere with my major claim, so I went for the easiest, Fractured Nasal bone with Deviated Septum due to Trauma, worth only 10%, but it gave me some breathing room, now I'm waiting on a claim for secondary problems due to the fractured nasal bone award. If that is approved, then It will either bring me up to 20% or 30% each condition I claim has a self limit of 10% each, so if I only get one, that gets me to 20%, but if I get the other two, it will bring the total in VA math to 30%, which gives me enough to make it through the winters here without going into debt each time.

Once this claim is in the bag, I can get down to the major claim with my new evidence and hopefully, when it is approved, I'll be able to go for at the very least, TDIU.

I'm not counting any apples yet, just showing how if you pick at the VA, you will eventually get their.

Rockhound Rider :blink:

Edited by Rockhound

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use