Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Depression Service Connection Vs. Ptsd Possible Triggers

Rate this question


MikeR

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Well I am waiting on the results of my foot after my second C&P, I have been sending in evidence constantly in support of the PTSD claim. The records center sent back a vague acknowledgement of one stressor, and informs for me the vet to provide more in formation on the second set of stressors. I did, as much as possible. The person in charge of the MACOM HR basically told me that they have the most vague non-detail records for old members of the organization. I have provided all I can, letters, write-ups, awards, buddies, etc... The VA psych provided service connection, and a diagnosis for Severe PTSD (Which is my claim). My other diagnosis is Severe Depression, for which the VA notes I was treated for on Active Duty. I have yet to claim it. Assuming they deny my PTSD claim, will they offer the Depression, or do I have to claim it on a new claim?

Edited by Tbird
POSSIBLE TRIGGER Added to Topic Title
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
That is what I need to know. They want to tie the stressor to symptoms of re-experiencing etc, as required by the PTSD diagnosis.

Have you tried to find any news paper articles from local press. They recognize that you were there.

Can you remember names of people or a CO who was there with you. Have you tried to find them.

What was your MOS or job classification. I will try and search how claims were handled for other individuals who worked as an investigator.

I was trained as civilian Private Investigator and I am pretty good at skip tracing. I also have some resources for finding someone who is still on active duty. Maybe I can help finding a CO or other people familiar with what was going on in Haiti.

I will be back online Thursday night Pacific Time.

Hoppy, I don't want to put the names of Agents online.

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Mike,

"The veteran should be advised to be as specific as possible, to include providing, relevant names, dates, places, and descriptions of stressful events."

They might be asking for names of people so as to search for them your behalf. Definately provide them with names and ask them to assit with locating these people. Maybe I can help by passing along some techniques I use to find people and you can do them on your own. More on this later.

The other information can be used by a clinician. However, if they are requiring it for the purpose of verifying a stressor they might be asking for to specific of details. Get this info if possible. There might be another way to argue this claim if you can not get this info.

As far as Haiti goes this is what I will be researching.

The VA has been told by the court that they are seeking to specific of verification of a stressor for combat veterans. There is a decision that I will post Thursday when I get back to my computer that we used on Yoggies claim. The case is used to allow veterans with non-combat MOS's to be viewed as in combat if their unit as a whole came under attack. I think this case would have relevence to a rescue operation where the unit as a whole was exposed to a disaster.

The most famous cases of PTSD did not involve the military. The rescue workers who responded to the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City has been recognized in the literature on PTSD.

On the CID I will research how individuals with the same MOS have had there claims adjudicated. I still need an MOS or specific job description that is supported by your DD 214 or other documentation.

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Mike,

"The veteran should be advised to be as specific as possible, to include providing, relevant names, dates, places, and descriptions of stressful events."

They might be asking for names of people so as to search for them your behalf. Definately provide them with names and ask them to assit with locating these people. Maybe I can help by passing along some techniques I use to find people and you can do them on your own. More on this later.

The other information can be used by a clinician. However, if they are requiring it for the purpose of verifying a stressor they might be asking for to specific of details. Get this info if possible. There might be another way to argue this claim if you can not get this info.

As far as Haiti goes this is what I will be researching.

The VA has been told by the court that they are seeking to specific of verification of a stressor for combat veterans. There is a decision that I will post Thursday when I get back to my computer that we used on Yoggies claim. The case is used to allow veterans with non-combat MOS's to be viewed as in combat if their unit as a whole came under attack. I think this case would have relevence to a rescue operation where the unit as a whole was exposed to a disaster.

The most famous cases of PTSD did not involve the military. The rescue workers who responded to the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City has been recognized in the literature on PTSD.

On the CID I will research how individuals with the same MOS have had there claims adjudicated. I still need an MOS or specific job description that is supported by your DD 214 or other documentation.

Thanks ,

There is a buddy from CID I have been trying to reach. Not many people have been sympathetic to this particular cause. I spent a lot of time getting innocent people out of trouble. We had a 60% plus turnover rate after 3 years. I was totally burned out from that, and never really recovered. It's like spending 12+ hours per day for almost 3 years in other peoples personal hell. There are so many victims of MST that I spent a lot of time trying to get justice for, what I see the VA doing to them makes my stomach really churn. I have been in and out of therapy, so far the only thing that works is the drugs. There are not many cases like mine, it's a code of silence sort of thing. I appreciate all of your help. The Haiti operation was not trouble free as most people believe. Once we got past the beginning of the operation, we had Hurricane Gordon. In our camp we were in water pretty deep, and we thought we were going to die. The island lost about 1200 people, and the Engineer unit I was with was assigned to dig out a village. I know I prayed more there than anytime in my life. I had spent years trying to be normal. It's damn hard. No matter how many degrees I have gotten there are things I can't shake. One Psychologist I worked with stopped with me as he was getting nightmares just from talking to me. Since I was an Intern in CID and was like free labor from my unit, and quit CID school halfway through it, it' s not on the DD214. I have provided orders to the school, and award copies from that unit. As well as Happy Birthday greetings from the Unit Commander. I have search the BVA cases, and am starting to think that Cop Shock in the military is breaking entirely new ground.

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can sympathise with you, even though I don't think I suffer with PTSD. I was a Navy Hospital Corpsman and witnessed and even particiipated in life and death situations more than I want to remember. Not my life and death, but of others I was attempting to save. I held duties taking care of premature babies, which had me crying myself to sleep on a few occasions, when a baby under my care died, litterly in my hands. As you would guess, I didn't last long in that duty as you might guess.

I also manned an ambulance during after hours duty and serviced and transported the injured and ill people. Mostly helping the injured, from a simple accident to a multiple car wreck with some having died and others with major and life threatening injuries that would have a normal person gaging from the blood and gore of it all.

Like you, all this would be hard to document, giving the time having past and it would stretch the benefit of the doubt quite severly. My most scary situation didn't involve any blood and gore, but it was in some ways, had me and others worried about our exposure for a couple of weeks. I noted one of my patient for yellow jauntice, which turned out to be viral hepatitis. I had to put the ship on quaritine for a couple of weeks while the shps crew was in a near panick by the end of the quarintine. The only good things that came out of that epiisode, was that the ship, after the quarintine was lifted, the ship got a complete and very exstensive wash down

Anyway, as you can see, I sympathise about your need to know and document that which most would hope and pray, to forget in time so we don't have to experience the visions over and over again.

Rockhound Rider B)

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Mike,

“The clinical evaluation noted that the veteran had an adjustment/personality disorder and was being followed by "CMH" and psychiatry. Such relevant records are not contained in the claims file and therefore a remand is necessary to obtain them.”

This is very interesting. These records need to be obtained. Adjustment disorder can be a provisional diagnosis used in the early stages of immediate onset PTSD. This is due to the fact that the diagnosis of adjustment disorder requires a stressor.

Adjustment disorder (AD) The diagnostic criteria in the DSM-IV are

A. The development of emotional or behavioral symptoms in response to an identifiable stressor(s) occurring within three months of the onset of the stressor(s). B. These symptoms or behaviors are clinically significant as evidenced by either of the following:

1. marked distress that is in excess of what would be expected from exposure to the stressor

2. significant impairment in social or occupational (academic) functioning

C. The stress-related disturbance does not meet the criteria for another specific Axis I disorder and is not merely an exacerbation of a preexisting Axis I or Axis II disorder.

D. The symptoms do not represent Bereavement.

Once the stressor (or its consequences) has terminated, the symptoms do not persist for more than an additional six months.

The dual diagnosis of personality disorder and adjustment disorder may not be a problem.

However, disability resulting from a

mental disorder that is superimposed upon a personality

disorder may be service connected. 38 C.F.R. § 4.127.

“Such may include, if necessary, obtaining the veteran's service personnel records”

Do you have a copy of your personnel file. I recently read a personnel file for a veteran and it had some surprises. Who ever wrote up his quarterly marks had a lot to say.

This is the case that might have some relevance if you can establish your unit as a whole was engaged in a rescue operation.

"Credible supporting evidence" does not mean that

the veteran must definitively establish his personal

engagement in combat. Suozzi v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 307, 311

(1997) (requiring corroboration of every detail, including

the veteran's personal participation, VA defined

"corroboration" too narrowly). Rather, the veteran's

presence with his unit at a time when his unit is attacked

tends to show that that the veteran experienced such attack

personally, without specifically showing his personal

participation. See Id.; see also Pentecost v. Principi, 16

Vet. App. 124 (2002).

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hoppy,

I have not found anything in the file, which is ironic as they approved the HSM for us. They did not say why on the medal file. I included this in the records that I provided the AMC. I am also attempting to locate a buddy via all possible means. I know where he lives, but his phone info has changed, as his ex-wife has as well.

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use