Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appealing Pain Management Agreement, Etc.

Rate this question


rentalguy1

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Some of you all know that I violated my pain management agreement because I couldn't pee on demand. The chief of PC has seen fit to pull me off of darvocet due to this, even though I cannot tolerate the stronger narcotics due to suicidal behavior caused by them in the recent past. This person also put some lies in my medical records. I just found all of this out today, and I have contacted the patient advocate and been instructed to write a letter of appeal. Here it is for your comments:

Ms. X and Ms. Y,

First I would like to extend my appreciation to the staff of the James H. Quillen VAMC. The care that I have received from this hospital has been outstanding, and I look forward to continuing my care here for many years to come.

On June 22, 2009 I had a appointment with the orthopedic clinic at the hospital, followed by labwork which had been previously scheduled. Between the two appointments, I had a urgent need to stop by the restroom. This has apparently wreaked havoc on my medical care within the primary care clinic. When I arrived at the lab, I was told that I had been scheduled for a urine drug screen, and that I would need to provide a sample. I told them that I had just used the restroom on the way to the lab, and that I would not be able to provide a specimen for quite some time. They told me to drink water and wait.

Ordinarily, this would not have been a problem, but on this particular day my in-laws were visiting from Austin, TX, and my entire family was waiting on me to come home and resume our plans. They were only able to visit for a few days, and I did not want to let everyone down because I was stuck at the VA hospital waiting to pee. I explained my situation to the lady in the lab, and asked if I could reschedule. She told me to call the hospital and reschedule the lab. There was never any discussion of a violation of a pain agreement. Furthermore, I was never given any warning regarding the uds. Had I known I needed to give a urine sample at the lab, I would not have stopped at the restroom on the way over.

This incident has led to a violation of my pain management agreement, cessation of my Darvocet prescription, and questionable language in my medical records. These are the three issues that I wish to appeal.

I. Violation of Pain Management Agreement

A. I understand the need for a pain management agreement, and for the need of pill counts and drug screens.

B. As I understand it, I am to be called in for a drug screen, and I am to be given 24 hours to respond to that call. This is per my copy of the pain management agreement.

1. I never received a call telling me that I was to submit to a drug screen.

2. If I had cancelled/rescheduled my ortho and lab appointments for that morning, because of my in-laws visit, would that have constituted a violation of my pain management agreement?

3. If I had been unable to keep that morning's lab appointment for any reason whatsoever, would that have violated my pain management agreement, even though I had no idea I was to be given a drug screen?

C. When I called in to reschedule the labs, I was given a date and time to be at the lab. There was no mention of a violation of my pain management agreement.

D. When I came to the lab at the rescheduled time is when I was notified that I could not have the lab work done and that I was in violation of the agreement.

E. I immediately called and scheduled a appointment with Mrs. Z, my new primary care provider, in order to rectify this dilemma. At my appointment she told me that she does not have to give me any warning of the drug screen, and that is what makes this random. I question the validity of that statement on the grounds that it is too easy to cause a violation if one does not even know there is to be a drug screen. She also said that I should have known to expect a urine sample because they are required at all labs.

1. I am not a medical professional, so I am not sure how I am supposed to know that a urine sample is required at all labs.

2. This particular lab appointment was for a lipid panel and liver function. All blood tests, as I am told.

3. The only other time I have been given a urine test is when I initially signed the pain management agreement in 2007. I was never required to give a urine sample at any other time until this most recent lab. This negates Mrs. Z's assertion that I should have known to expect a urine sample, because they are required at each lab.

4. Also at this appointment, I voluntarily brought all of my Darvocet pills in for a pill count, without being asked, and I submitted to a drug screen at the request of Mrs. Coeburn, without hesitation. The drug screen came back negative for anything except my prescribed medications, of course.

I seek to have my pain management agreement reinstated. I am not a illicit drug user. I am not a drug dealer, for if I was I would still have a prescription for methadone or morphine. I do not abuse the drugs that I am prescribed. I am a veteran who takes these prescriptions very seriously, and I try to live my life with integrity. I have been made to feel like a criminal in this case, and that is not how the VA is supposed to treat veterans.

II. Cessation of Darvocet Prescription

A. Due to the violation of my pain management agreement, my prescription of Darvocet was cancelled. When I appealed this through my primary care provider, the Primary Care Director, Dr. Complete Dumbass, stated that Darvocet is not the recommended narcotic therapy for long term pain management.

1. I have never been seen or treated by Dr. Dumbass.

2. It is very obvious that neither Mrs. Z nor Dr. Dumbass have reviewed my medical records thoroughly. If they had, they would have noticed that I tried the more appropriate narcotic Methadone, and failed it. I became suicidal on the stronger narcotic. That is the reason that Dr. Wishhehadntretired and I made the decision to keep me on Darvocet as long as I could manage my pain with it. I DO NOT WANT a stronger narcotic, as I am able to manage my pain level with Darvocet and my other medications.

B. I have been taking Darvocet continuously since late 2007, minus a very short time in early 2008 when I tried Methadone. That is nearly two years. To take me off of it now, would mean either withdrawals, or a severe increase in my pain level, or both. I do not want to suffer with either of these, nor do I want to take the risk of becoming constantly suicidal again with a stronger narcotic.

I seek to have my prescription for Darvocet renewed, as it best fits my situation. I understand that different practitioners have different thought processes concerning pain management, but is it really worth putting the patient through physical and/or mental hell just to show that you are smart? If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

III. Removal of Language From My Medical Records.

A. From 1994 until 2007 I was told by various VA doctors that my back problems were due to a back strain. They even had the X-RAYS to prove it. Since I am not a doctor, I put my full faith in them, even though I had debilitating symptoms that put me completely out of commission frequently. I had shooting pains down my legs. I had saddle area, leg and foot numbness. I also had urinary incontinence.

B. In 2007 my wife insisted that I go to a civilian doctor, and he sent me for a MRI. Turns out that I had worse problems with my back than I had been told. This MRI shows a disc bulge at L4-5, and a disc bulge, bilateral degenerative facet disease, and moderate central canal stenosis at L5-S1.

C. In December 2008 I had another MRI of my spine which showed the same conditions as the 2007 MRI.

D. On June 22, 2009 Dr. Complete Dumbass, Primary Care Director, made the following comment in my medical records, "Repeat MRI in 12/08 reviewed. No significant disc pathology to cause spinal stenosis."

E. I am not sure of Dr. Dumbass's qualifications in radiology, neurosurgery, or orthopedics, but I do know that his comment does not agree with the comments made by the qualified radiologists that read my MRI's. Furthermore, I am not even sure why a doctor would have made this statement to begin with. I want to stop short of a accusation of malicious intent, because I do not want to believe this to be true, but I feel as if I am being made out to be a liar and a drug seeker. The medical evidence in my records PROVES otherwise, though.

I seek to have this inaccurate language removed from my medical records. I do not need a explanation why it was put in there, I simply want it removed because it serves absolutely no meaningful purpose to be there.

Sincerely,

rentalguy

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would leave out the Dr. Dumbass part, but other than that I think it is good. I think to violate you just because you could not Pee that day is over the top. They are so suspicious of us. They think we are all drug dealers. That's is what the drug screen is all about, and nothing to do with your health or medical needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you all know that I violated my pain management agreement because I couldn't pee on demand. The chief of PC has seen fit to pull me off of darvocet due to this, even though I cannot tolerate the stronger narcotics due to suicidal behavior caused by them in the recent past. This person also put some lies in my medical records. I just found all of this out today, and I have contacted the patient advocate and been instructed to write a letter of appeal. Here it is for your comments:

Ms. X and Ms. Y,

First I would like to extend my appreciation to the staff of the James H. Quillen VAMC. The care that I have received from this hospital has been outstanding, and I look forward to continuing my care here for many years to come.

On June 22, 2009 I had a appointment with the orthopedic clinic at the hospital, followed by labwork which had been previously scheduled. Between the two appointments, I had a urgent need to stop by the restroom. This has apparently wreaked havoc on my medical care within the primary care clinic. When I arrived at the lab, I was told that I had been scheduled for a urine drug screen, and that I would need to provide a sample. I told them that I had just used the restroom on the way to the lab, and that I would not be able to provide a specimen for quite some time. They told me to drink water and wait.

Ordinarily, this would not have been a problem, but on this particular day my in-laws were visiting from Austin, TX, and my entire family was waiting on me to come home and resume our plans. They were only able to visit for a few days, and I did not want to let everyone down because I was stuck at the VA hospital waiting to pee. I explained my situation to the lady in the lab, and asked if I could reschedule. She told me to call the hospital and reschedule the lab. There was never any discussion of a violation of a pain agreement. Furthermore, I was never given any warning regarding the uds. Had I known I needed to give a urine sample at the lab, I would not have stopped at the restroom on the way over.

This incident has led to a violation of my pain management agreement, cessation of my Darvocet prescription, and questionable language in my medical records. These are the three issues that I wish to appeal.

I. Violation of Pain Management Agreement

A. I understand the need for a pain management agreement, and for the need of pill counts and drug screens.

B. As I understand it, I am to be called in for a drug screen, and I am to be given 24 hours to respond to that call. This is per my copy of the pain management agreement.

1. I never received a call telling me that I was to submit to a drug screen.

2. If I had cancelled/rescheduled my ortho and lab appointments for that morning, because of my in-laws visit, would that have constituted a violation of my pain management agreement?

3. If I had been unable to keep that morning's lab appointment for any reason whatsoever, would that have violated my pain management agreement, even though I had no idea I was to be given a drug screen?

C. When I called in to reschedule the labs, I was given a date and time to be at the lab. There was no mention of a violation of my pain management agreement.

D. When I came to the lab at the rescheduled time is when I was notified that I could not have the lab work done and that I was in violation of the agreement.

E. I immediately called and scheduled a appointment with Mrs. Z, my new primary care provider, in order to rectify this dilemma. At my appointment she told me that she does not have to give me any warning of the drug screen, and that is what makes this random. I question the validity of that statement on the grounds that it is too easy to cause a violation if one does not even know there is to be a drug screen. She also said that I should have known to expect a urine sample because they are required at all labs.

1. I am not a medical professional, so I am not sure how I am supposed to know that a urine sample is required at all labs.

2. This particular lab appointment was for a lipid panel and liver function. All blood tests, as I am told.

3. The only other time I have been given a urine test is when I initially signed the pain management agreement in 2007. I was never required to give a urine sample at any other time until this most recent lab. This negates Mrs. Z's assertion that I should have known to expect a urine sample, because they are required at each lab.

4. Also at this appointment, I voluntarily brought all of my Darvocet pills in for a pill count, without being asked, and I submitted to a drug screen at the request of Mrs. Coeburn, without hesitation. The drug screen came back negative for anything except my prescribed medications, of course.

I seek to have my pain management agreement reinstated. I am not a illicit drug user. I am not a drug dealer, for if I was I would still have a prescription for methadone or morphine. I do not abuse the drugs that I am prescribed. I am a veteran who takes these prescriptions very seriously, and I try to live my life with integrity. I have been made to feel like a criminal in this case, and that is not how the VA is supposed to treat veterans.

II. Cessation of Darvocet Prescription

A. Due to the violation of my pain management agreement, my prescription of Darvocet was cancelled. When I appealed this through my primary care provider, the Primary Care Director, Dr. Complete Dumbass, stated that Darvocet is not the recommended narcotic therapy for long term pain management.

1. I have never been seen or treated by Dr. Dumbass.

2. It is very obvious that neither Mrs. Z nor Dr. Dumbass have reviewed my medical records thoroughly. If they had, they would have noticed that I tried the more appropriate narcotic Methadone, and failed it. I became suicidal on the stronger narcotic. That is the reason that Dr. Wishhehadntretired and I made the decision to keep me on Darvocet as long as I could manage my pain with it. I DO NOT WANT a stronger narcotic, as I am able to manage my pain level with Darvocet and my other medications.

B. I have been taking Darvocet continuously since late 2007, minus a very short time in early 2008 when I tried Methadone. That is nearly two years. To take me off of it now, would mean either withdrawals, or a severe increase in my pain level, or both. I do not want to suffer with either of these, nor do I want to take the risk of becoming constantly suicidal again with a stronger narcotic.

I seek to have my prescription for Darvocet renewed, as it best fits my situation. I understand that different practitioners have different thought processes concerning pain management, but is it really worth putting the patient through physical and/or mental hell just to show that you are smart? If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

III. Removal of Language From My Medical Records.

A. From 1994 until 2007 I was told by various VA doctors that my back problems were due to a back strain. They even had the X-RAYS to prove it. Since I am not a doctor, I put my full faith in them, even though I had debilitating symptoms that put me completely out of commission frequently. I had shooting pains down my legs. I had saddle area, leg and foot numbness. I also had urinary incontinence.

B. In 2007 my wife insisted that I go to a civilian doctor, and he sent me for a MRI. Turns out that I had worse problems with my back than I had been told. This MRI shows a disc bulge at L4-5, and a disc bulge, bilateral degenerative facet disease, and moderate central canal stenosis at L5-S1.

C. In December 2008 I had another MRI of my spine which showed the same conditions as the 2007 MRI.

D. On June 22, 2009 Dr. Complete Dumbass, Primary Care Director, made the following comment in my medical records, "Repeat MRI in 12/08 reviewed. No significant disc pathology to cause spinal stenosis."

E. I am not sure of Dr. Dumbass's qualifications in radiology, neurosurgery, or orthopedics, but I do know that his comment does not agree with the comments made by the qualified radiologists that read my MRI's. Furthermore, I am not even sure why a doctor would have made this statement to begin with. I want to stop short of a accusation of malicious intent, because I do not want to believe this to be true, but I feel as if I am being made out to be a liar and a drug seeker. The medical evidence in my records PROVES otherwise, though.

I seek to have this inaccurate language removed from my medical records. I do not need a explanation why it was put in there, I simply want it removed because it serves absolutely no meaningful purpose to be there.

Sincerely,

rentalguy

Is the drug test SOP, or only some people have to take a drug test?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Everytime you give blood at the VA they check your blood for illegal drugs and alcohol. If you are in pain management they do periodic urine tests to see that you are taking your drugs. They do it to everyone in the program. I have been in the program for about five years. I made the mistake of complaining about side effects of the drugs one time and was ejected from the program until they got that worked out by trial and error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everytime you give blood at the VA they check your blood for illegal drugs and alcohol. If you are in pain management they do periodic urine tests to see that you are taking your drugs. They do it to everyone in the program. I have been in the program for about five years. I made the mistake of complaining about side effects of the drugs one time and was ejected from the program until they got that worked out by trial and error.

What happens if you are ejected from the program? Do they reduce your benefits? I'm just asking because I don't know about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Dr Dumbass lol. You know that any appeal will be taken to Dr Dumbass to get his side.

Good Luck

If it were me I would say that if there was a violation of the contract the VA did it and would like to be reinstated as it was and allow all to get by this unfortunate breech

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yeah...I inserted fictitious names here to protect the stupid. All I really want is for everything to go back to the way it was prior to 22 June.

Gulfvet...this has nothing to do with benefits. They take your pain meds away and treat you like a common criminal if you don't jump through everyone of their hoops.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use