Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Hey Everyone

Rate this topic


Jay Johnson

Recommended Posts

Sorry I've been away for so long, but the holidays were rough for the wife and the VA was, well, the VA. Anywho, I'm not sure if anyone remembers my wife's case, but I'll try to sum it up and how, exactly, we won the case (for the most part): About 2 yrs ago my wife was bumped up from 100% for PTSD to 100% P&T with A&A from the philadelphia RO...upon moving to the west coast, the seattle RO got ahold of her case and tried reducing her first to 70% IU, then to 100% with housebound and claimed she was again P&T, yet scheduled a future exam. We, of course, sent in our NOD AND I sent in a CUE about taking away the A&A without cause (they said she never deserved it in the 1st place which is against the regs) and we sent one in about scheduling an exam despite being P&T. Well, we got the typical run-around from our contacts in the seattle RO and had the same old delays for a DRO review (we even had a senator working for us...like that does anything). One day I decided to have the wife call our contact there (frank) who "use" to be the vice-director of the RO, but he had been temporarily promoted to director because the old director left....oddly enough, frank was very receptive to my wife and said he would look into the case. Two days later the DRO called my wife and asked her what, exactly, she wanted from the NOD (of course she broke down on the phone call pretty bad)...he proceeded to say that they COULD NOT schedule a future exam with P&T and that he would clear that up, but he showed reservations about awarding her the A&A again. So, the wife basically told the DRO that she didn't care about the A&A so long as she didn't have to deal with them again (which she shouldn't given she was P&T to start with). The DRO made the decision that day and we got notice by mail within 2 days saying "NO FUTURE EXAMS and 100% P&T with housebound".

In the end, it came down to "who" we knew and having that person look into our case...before the acting director stepped in the DRO wasn't even supposed to get to our case until may, at the earliest, instead, we got a decision in our favor within 2 months of filing the NOD.

On one hand, I'm extremely relieved that we're done with these people (we use a civilian psych so we will never set foot near a VA facility EVER again)...on the other hand, I feel terrible for everyone else who doesn't have the contacts I made in the seattle RO (which was more dumb luck then anything). Our case was blatant and bordering on criminally obvious and we still would likely not have won at the DRO level had the director not stepped in:-(

Anyway, it's good to be back...I'm not sure how much time I can devote, but I hope everyone is doing well and that some of you have some success stories since my last visit:-)

Edited by Jay Johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

Nice to see you again Jay. I remember you used to post a lot of good info.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay,

Congrats on the claim.

WELCOME BACK ! ! ! Hope you're going to stay with us.

I've REALLY been missing your posts.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay-- Glad to hear that you were successfull at getting her P&T back.

The truth of the matter is she should never had to endure this crap anyway. As for her A/A she is entitled because she needs help to protect her they forget that this also entitles someone if they are unable to protect themselves. I have been back and forth with these idiots. They had me reduced to 90 percent and had taken my A/A. They retracted on the reduction and have reccomended HB. I am still fighting so now they are starting all of these C&P again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay-- Glad to hear that you were successfull at getting her P&T back.

The truth of the matter is she should never had to endure this crap anyway. As for her A/A she is entitled because she needs help to protect her they forget that this also entitles someone if they are unable to protect themselves. I have been back and forth with these idiots. They had me reduced to 90 percent and had taken my A/A. They retracted on the reduction and have reccomended HB. I am still fighting so now they are starting all of these C&P again.

Thanks dorothy:-) It seems that they are trying to reduce most PTSD folks with A&A to HB to save some money. In my wife's case they gave NO new information in their decision and, merely said that they did not agree with her ever having been awarded it in the first place (which is against the regs and I CUED it). Basically, in the end, the HB is more advantageous to us because it allows me more freedom. Under her last award for A&A it was written that she needed me with her at all times for suicidal/homicidal ideation...there is a chance, in the future, that this level of self harm may subside, which means, technically, I would have to inform them of the improvement, or, if they found out, they could sue us for overpayment for the time she no longer required A&A (again, opening pandora's box). HB, on the other hand, is less strict and considered to be permanent (as a single disability and not several 60%+ disabilities). There is a chance that my wife could become less dependent on me (god I hope so), but there is little chance that she'll ever regain her ability to function in society independently....so, with HB I lose a couple hundred dollars per month, but I believe it gives us more stability. Also, I didn't want to put the wife through further appeals on the matter....$200 just isn't worth the hell of fighting the VA for the next few years:-(

With that said, I certainly don't discourage you from getting what you deserve, but just make sure it's something you truly feel is worth the hell that the VA will put you through to get it. BTW, under the HB single disability rule you MUST be P&T to qualify and cannot have future exams scheduled, which, in my opinion, puts you on more solid ground then A&A which has no such prerequisites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use