Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Mental Retardation And/or Developmental Delay Rvn Vet Needs Help

Rate this question


tssnave

Question

Need ideas - with supporting citations to M21-1MR, CFR, and court cases - concerning Presumption of Soundness for Duty or any other avenue to help a boots in country, non combatant, honorably discharged, unmarried RVN vet who is mentally retarded and/or developmentally delayed get access to VA healthcare. He has no other mental illness dx or physical disability dx. He hasn’t worked for years due to his mental illness and he is not currently using any VA services.

- I know he can get access to VA healthcare based on low income but he’d be a Category 8 vet so we all know he’d go to the back of the line.

- He should be eligible for a VA pension but hasn’t applied.

- However, if he’s eligible, disability would be the best way to go but other than a possible argument based on the Presumption of Soundness I don’t know of an avenue to use and I doubt, without another mental illness dx, that he could successfully argue Soundness (even though he was able to serve out his hitch).

1. Could he, with a strong IMO, mount a successful argument that his time in the military aggravated his mental retardation?

2. Are there any court cases where a vet has been successful in getting disability when mental retardation was present but not noted in his SMRs and is still present without any other mental illness dx?

3. Any other avenue of approach to try in this case?

Thanks,

TS Snave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

When you say mentally retarded do you mean someone with a mental score lower than the standard? I know that toward the end of the war the military would take anyone with a pulse. Mental retardation is not a mental disease. It is not compensable unless it is caused by some event in service like a brain injury. Retardation is like a personality disorder in the eyes of the military and VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

§ 4.127 Mental retardation and personality disorders.

Mental retardation and personality disorders are not diseases or injuries for compensation purposes, and, except as provided in §3.310(a) of this chapter, disability resulting from them may not be service-connected. However, disability resulting from a mental disorder that is superimposed upon mental retardation or a personality disorder may be service-connected.

§3.310 Disabilities that are proximately due to, or aggravated by, service-connected disease or injury.

(a) General. Except as provided in §3.300©, disability which is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury shall be service connected. When service connection is thus established for a secondary condition, the secondary condition shall be considered a part of the original condition.

Now if he has another mental disorder such as depression, anxiety disorder, panic disorder, PTSD etc., he can file a claim. Just a matter of have him diagnosed and a nexus.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- I know he can get access to VA healthcare based on low income but he'd be a Category 8 vet so we all know he'd go to the back of the line.

VA doesn't pay much attention to what Category we are in.

- He should be eligible for a VA pension but hasn't applied.

Apply for that and SSI at the same time.

SSI will probably be granted first.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

TS

How the heck did this vet get into the military being retarded. I know the Army was desparate for soldiers during Vietnam, but that is going over the line. They did take many criminals. The deal was either jail or the army. I do know that no one failed the PT test or the rifle range when I was in Basic. If someone could not shoot straight the Drill Sarge would take that person out to the range by himself and he would pass. They let us grade ourselves on the M-16 during the one week preparation for RVN at Ft Riley, KS. It was winter and we lay in the snow shooting the M-16. Great traing for the jungle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

John, I remember in bootcamp, especially one guy. who didn't know his right from left and other simple commands, while in formation or marching. He was always pissing off the DI. When you talked to this troop he had this vacant look in his eyes. He couldn't read or talk very well. If I had to guess his IQ was maybe 50-60. He made it through boot camp. It was sad to see the military drafting someone like this, then putting a weapon in his hands and sending him to VN to be killed or get somebody else killed. I know if I was on patrol and had him in my unit, I would be very concerned. Only reason I wasn't sent into the bush, was because I am color blind. Couldn't distinguish a tree from a gook at 50 yards. It is strange how they saw my eyes as a handicap and see someone who is low IQed and iliterate not handicaped.

t&b

" In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a Congress"

- John Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use