Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Need Help

Rate this question


Mr cue

Question

i put in claim 94 it was denied put in paper to continue my appeal never hear anything 2001 i sumitt papers and was award 60% iu eef 2001.i put in for a cue of 94 claim i went to bva. the bva denied it because it was still a open appeal that was never cretify to them. and remanded it to amc/ro my question and i can not find any in cfr for this. if my claim was still open from 94 should this be my eef for my 60%iu i was awarded in 2001. i never work since 94 va is a wear of this. can some help me find cfr or case that like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

http://www.va.gov/vetapp09/files2/0914289.txt

In this BVA case the vet had filed what appeared to be a claim in 1992 that remained open.

The decision cites Ingram V Nicholson and also mentions how the EED will be affected.

In your case-your were unemployable since 1994 and I assume due to the same reason for your eventual 60% IU award.

Do you get SSA for the same thing that VA serviced connected in 2001.

When did you get this SSA award?

Did VA ever acknowledge the SSA award -if you got one?

I would certainly feel that if this apparent still open claim is adjudicated and awarded -the EED would have to be 1994 with the retro to 1994 less the amount you received since 2001 award.

Or it could be a staged rating- maybe 10%, to 30% , etc-

or-if the medical evidence in 1994 warranted it- the TDIU from that date.

But one problem I see is if the VA hinges solely on their date of receipt of the TDIU form.Yet if the evidence warranted them considering you for TDIU in 1994 -then perhaps they will award the TDIU as retro.

I understand that this is a basis of a remand you got from the BVA.

The BVA obviously saw evidence that this 1994 claim was still open.

If they gave you SC in 2001, there must have been a basis for SC in 1994.

Do you have copies of all of your records going back to 1994?

If the claim is still open- this is not a CUE claim but I would be jumping for joy if I were you-as this is as good as succeeding in a CUE if the VA has to adjudicate and award that older claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS-can you give us the Citation and Docket Number? It might be at the BVA web site buy now-

in the remand- if I were you-

where they tell the VARO what to do next- if there is anything mentioned there that you yourself could do and submit to VA-that would help-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might help too:

http://www.hadit.com/significant_judicial_...ls_fy_2007.html

Ingram link is on that page and more info as to what consitutes a Pending and open claim.

Also I think Cook V Principi refers to same subject.

I just read something at CAVC that wont help - the vet had an apparent still open claim regarding "nerves" and subsequently was awarded for PTSD and tried for better EED back to 1986.

The CAVC agreed with the BVA that the subsequent PTSD award had nothing to do with the "nerve" claim or the EED.

But I remember my husband's first VA award letter-probably still here from 1983- and they said his PTSD was "nervous problem" or something like that .But it was PTSD.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When I was rated in 1973 it was for a "nervous disorder". Years later the VA denied I was ever rated for a nervous disorder but I have the records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is the docket number 09-19 043 i want to thank u for the cases they help me under stand what is next i was granted one thing in 94and deined other. remaned only talk about the denied issue. i went 60%iu 2001 for the one that was granted 94. no i never got ssi i was in voc rehab 94 with 10% because my disabilty effected my work comp exam 94 stated i was not work and on soc for my cue ro stated i had not work since 94. 2001 comp exam doc say the likely hood of me working again is slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

yulooking:

Hang in there you can win.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use