Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Questions On Filing C&ue Claim With An Eed. Circa 1969

Rate this question


RSG

Question

I was wondering how I might determine if my claim was worth filing, for a CUE claim with an EED.

My BVA decision seems to indicate to me that a cue claim would be a reality in my case....

Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but I think the judge seems to think it may be vaild.....How to I go

about verifiyng wether or not this would be, by studying the deci sions he cited on my claim., or is

there something else I should look for....I was just denied My IU also....Got questions there too.

Tnx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Why would this be a reconsideration? What is subsumed?

RSG

Berta, I suspect you are right that the CUEs are in the RO denials, but nonetheless those earlier decisions have possibly been subsumed by the BVA decision so the errors in the BVA decision possibly must be attacked in a request for reconsideration.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not see in any way that the BVA subsumed the CUE in their decision-

I consider 'subsume' in VA lingo to mean that if the CUE was incorporated in the BVA decision-then it was subsumed.

In RSG's case I feel the CUE was committed by the VARO.The VARO who committed the CUE gets the CUE claim.

A Reconsideration Request is only available when a claim is pending at the RO level-

or a Motion for Reconsideration is filed on a BVA decision within the proper appellate time frame for that and the claim is still pending.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes Delta that was a typo-

we used VAOGC Pres Op 3-2003 in the actual final draft of the CUE claim and attached it I believe.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seem to remember reading somewhere that there is some kind of form that forces the VA to process this faster if there are health issues that may make you pass soon...Is that true, I also read that there are way's to sue the DAV

if they have lost ,funds for you, if they screwed up..... They Kept agreeing with the VA all these years.....

Is that true or am I just dreaming...... OK, now I understand thanks Berta....

RSG

I did not see in any way that the BVA subsumed the CUE in their decision-

I consider 'subsume' in VA lingo to mean that if the CUE was incorporated in the BVA decision-then it was subsumed.

In RSG's case I feel the CUE was committed by the VARO.The VARO who committed the CUE gets the CUE claim.

A Reconsideration Request is only available when a claim is pending at the RO level-

or a Motion for Reconsideration is filed on a BVA decision within the proper appellate time frame for that and the claim is still pending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA can "expedite" a claim with good cause Ron and of course the BVA will tell them to expedite remands.

I think they only expedite in the true sense if for example WWII vet on life support.

It is rare but can be done-

Also if a vet rep errs to the extent that they have cost you compensation they can be sued in state court.

There was a PTSD vet who sued his rep and won some years ago-I posted the story here at hadit-

The rep apparently failed to file his TDIU form and this cost the vet thousands of dollars due to the wrong EED.

I sued my rep for negligence in a federal court-

I should have been in a state court.

My premise (which I agrued with Judge on- which one should never argue with a Judge) was that since the DAV is chartered by COngress I had a case that was a federal question issue.

We went round and round and I deposed the Vet rep myself. His lawyer was stunned that I had succeeded in my claims and a FTCA case-

I won my claims during process of this suit- I had no damages anymore.

The case was closed against the rep.

This rep hopefully never treated a widow like crap anymore.

His lawyer (for the DAV) suggested I get into law school because I presented my legal issues well.He seemed stunned I had sued VA myself and won.

But the FTCA case was easier than succeeding in a VA claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't think anyone or anybody can force the VA to do anything short of a court order.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use