Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Think Va Wants To Make A Deal? Hold It!

Rate this question


Jayg

Question

Hi all.

I carry TVC, Texas Veterans Commission as my Veteran Service Organization. Jim Strickland calls them one of the better ones. I called them to check the status of my appeal which they told had received a grant with which I should be, not just "pleased, but "very pleased." So much so with what was granted, that I should want or be willing to drop certain parts of mt claim. From my perspective, the only thing that will do that for me is an increase to minimum of 70% and IU but I didn't say that to the guy. Anyway, its been the old waiting game again.

Being onn pins & needles, tenter hooks, take your pick, I called TVC today to check on the progress. (the 800 # doesn't even know a grant has been made) The fellow looks and says hold up. They, TVC, have my file. It was sent to them but he couldn't say why. My regular contact there (who was in hearing earlier) was going to lunch by then but said he wouldcall me afterwards... OHH--Kay!

It was much later but he actually did call back. They wanted a counselor to talk to me about accepting what they have approved while dropping the rest. If theyhave granted the IU, with at least 70% s/c, I will be fine with that.

B~U~T~!

I DO NOT want to lock myself out of anything I may need to pursue later. What I would like to know is what specific action, what wording, will leave me the option of reopening a condition, either named in my present claims or as something new, later on.

Help me CMA here,

pul-l-eeze!?? :rolleyes:

Edited by Jayg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder
Hi all.

... I DO NOT want to lock myself out of anything I may need to pursue later. What I would like to know is what specific action, what wording, will leave me the option of reopening a condition, either named in my present claims or as something new, later on.

... :rolleyes:

New evidence

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Best wishes Jayg. IMHO... IU is like a ball and chain, if you are young. Providing for a family and trying to be productive in society becomes a compromise. Even though you may never be able to work again, the risk of losing IU overshadows the risk of trying to go out there and live you life to the fullest. I hope you win, and you enjoy your retirement

footnote; Volunteering is fulfilling work, if you are IU.

Best wishes...

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VA is not supposed to make deals. And you don't have to drop any claim at all.

If they have enough evidence to award you TDIU- they should do that.Period. No deal. They can defer or deny any other claims and it is up to you to continue these other claims.

Say a vet gets TDIU award for PTSD but also has a vague claim pending for "heart problems"which might well have some basis in their SMRS (or maybe the vet is an AO vet and this is ischemic heart disease -which just went onto the AO list).

Say the vet drops the heart claim and takes the TDIU and then 12 months from now -after he/she does NOT file a NOD) ....he or she drops dead.

A spouse can "substitute" him/herself now on any pending claims (new reg) but this vet would not HAVE a pending claim-putting the spouse at day one in attempting to get DIC.

In this same example -Say the vet does not drop the heart claim and VA ultimately awards with a rating of 60% or more. The vet is eligible for SMC "S".

If the vet did not pursue the heart claim , they would get no SMC "S".

"I DO NOT want to lock myself out of anything I may need to pursue later. What I would like to know is what specific action, what wording, will leave me the option of reopening a condition, either named in my present claims or as something new, later on.

Help me CMA here,

pul-l-eeze!?? unsure.gif"

Remind the TVC that if the evidence awards you TDIU,(OR 70%-) you dont really know yet what they will award- that is what the award letter should state and they can defer or deny the other claims (with complete reasons and bases) and you will exercise your appellate rights immediately.

This is just my opinion-

I have never seen VA send a letter to a vet saying "you told us you would drop your claim for XXXX if we granted you a claim for YYYYY so we will not re-open your XXXXX claim."

They can't say that-because they aren't allowed to make deals.They Can suggest strongly that it could be beneficial to accept an award and drop a different claim that seems to have little or no good evidentiary basis.Even a vet rep can suggest doing that... if the other claims (s) seems to have no good bases.

Then again I won all my main claims -claims which many vet reps felt didn't have a chance.

It is up to you but it is solely the evidence that determines an award. Not any deal.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I think you are ok to take whatever deal they offer you and here is why. In a nutshell, your risks of this going bad are not that high, while you should get almost an immediate reward. I like those kinds of odds. Mind you I am not an attorney, so if you know one, by all means take his advice over mine. This is the way I see it.

Lets say the VA offers you IU and you agree to drop, say sleep apnea..just as examples. For a minute, lets just consider the "downside risk" part, which, of course, may never happen.

A few years later, you feel better enough to go to work, and you do so, but you still have OSA that could be worth 50%. So, predictably the VA drops your IU, and you wind up with, say, 60%, and you feel that is not enough. The drop in IU goes through as your protests are unsuccessful.

Remember that VA inefficiency can work FOR you sometimes, as well as it has worked against you in the past.

Now you want to get OSA started again because 1) you think you deserve it and 2) you need it.

So, you reapply for OSA that you agreed to drop 3 years ago.

VA says, no way you dropped it 3 years ago.

Remember this: The VA will use the regulations against you, as a weapon to reduce your benefits. This is a given. But, you ALSO have the regulations, as a weapon against them! They have their "weaseling" out of giving you your due, but you, have a resource at your disposal that they dont have. You see, you can review your claim, over and over, and over..and become an expert in your claim, especially with hadit members help. There is no way that any rating specialist is going to know as much about your claim as you do, if you are diligent about reading and rereading what the VA has sent you in things like your decisions, IRIS emails, VCAA letters etc. Armed with this claim knowledge, then you can get guidance here on hadit as the best course to take. With persistance, the Veteran is "at least as likely as not" to win, IMHO, because remember, you need only convince ANY ONE of these people to get your benefits: 1. Rating Speciaist 2. DRO Review Officer 3 BVA judge 4 CAVC judge 5. Federal court judge. If any one of these decide in your favor you win. For the VA to win, they have to win all 5 decisions, if you just keep on trying. You need only win 1 out of 5, or 20% and you win. I think there is an excellent chance you can beat VA employees, as they are usually overworked and frankly many of them dont even care if you win. Some of them actually WANT the Veteran to win benefits he is entitled to. IN summary, I recommend taking the deal, but keeping documents of everything just in case you need it in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Yes, its as Berta says. If you take the deal and it does not work out, then tell the appeal judge you dropped your claim because the VA offered you a deal. You see, the deal they are offering you is illegal, so use this to your advantage. This is why there is very little risk to you to accepting the deal. If you turn it down, I can almost guarntee the VA will put you on the hampster wheel of deny,delay, appeal, deny delay, appeal. Dont volunteer to jump on the hampster wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Remember: Take the name, date, time of call and all details of person(s) who offer you a deal. Put this in your file and it is your ace in the hole that you can use later if the VA screws you over again. Even tho this person probably wont be there in several years when you need it, you still have your evidence.

Then, to CYA, save your phone bill/record of said phone call "deal", and write everything down at the time, so you dont forget details later.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use