Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tdrl Psychiatric Narrative Summary

Rate this question


indyboi

Question

AXIS I: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Chronic.

LOD: Yes EPTS: None

Impairment from Military Service: Severe

Impairment from Industiral/Social Adaptability: Severe

Panic Disorder with Agoraphobia

LOD: Yes EPTS: None

Impairment from Military Service: Severe

Impairment from Industiral/Social Adaptability: Severe

Any ideas on the ratings? Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If not able to work 100% I have the same dx and I have 100% P&T

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, and you should ask for housebound as well. I say 100% with housebound and P&T.

What a cruel fate to join the military in fine shape and be discharge as a guy with severe emotional disability. The military needs to fix what they broke, and not just discharge PTSD vets to a life of unemployment and disability. I think they should offer PTSD vets a job in the states with a permanent profile if they want one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Let me know if I'm wrong, it appears this is your first post on hadit. I couldn't find any other posts regarding your situation. Where did this report come from? Is this a compensation and pension exam for a service connected disability or a non-service connected pension? If this report was generated by a VA treating clinician or a private clinician and the claimed stressor in this report has not been verified as outlined in VA law and the report is submitted as evidence for a service connected disability of PTSD, the report will not be given any weight in the VA system until the stressor has been verified. Doctors can make a preliminary determination that the stressor is caused by military service. However, adjudication has an entire set of rules involved in verifying the stressor that doctors are unaware of. If this report is from a compensation and pension exam for initial evaluation of a PTSD claim, then the VA adjudicator has probably already verified the stressor.

If the stressor has not been verified through adjudication and you need assistance in verifying the stressor let us know.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

What Hoppy just said.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Just to clarify my previous post, I have seen a case where the veteran filed a claim for a breathing condition and was awarded a non-service connected pension for PTSD because there was a report in the medical file identical to the one you posted. Additionally, the case I'm familiar with a clinician made reference to specific events that occurred in the military as causing the PTSD. However, the report did not result in a determination that the PTSD service connected.

What is interesting is that the report was generated by treating clinician at a VA hospital and the veteran was not seeking any benefits for either a non-service connected pension or a service connected pension at the time report was generated. An adjudicator went into great detail as to how the PTSD is related to military service when awarding the non-service connected pension. There was no reason for an adjudicator to go into such detail about the relationship between the events in the military causing the PTSD while making an assessment for a non-service connected pension.

At the time they awarded the non-service connected pension for PTSD the veteran had a slamdunk claim for service connection of panic disorder. I am convinced the language used in the award for the non-service connected pension for PTSD was chosen to steer the veteran away from filing a panic disorder claim and towards a PTSD claim whereby the PTSD claim would be denied because the stressors noted by the rater awarding the non-service connected pension was clearly not verifiable. I think it was a tactic to cause confusion and delays.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoppy,

Did this person ever switch over and try to get the PTSD SC'd

("An adjudicator went into great detail as to how the PTSD is related to military service when awarding the non-service connected pension.")

or

SC a claim for panic disorder?

("At the time they awarded the non-service connected pension for PTSD the veteran had a slamdunk claim for service connection of panic disorder.")

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use