Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Knock Me Over With A Feather

Rate this question


johnjjr

Question

I posted on wed. I was unsure about filing a NOD on my Jan '09 decision. Well, I did. Hand delivered the papers to the RO wed. afternoon,got a signature and came home. 150 miles round trip but worth it. Out of curiosity, I called the 800 # this morning at 11:15 AM to see if it was in the system yet.I was told that this morning a DRO had requested a hearing on my NOD. I couldn't believe it, so I called again and was told the exact same thing. I was told on the second call that it will be after the first of the year before a hearing can be scheduled. Talk about the speed of light. I didn't know the VA could move so fast.

Do you think there is a legit reason for this or am I just being shuffled to meet someone's quota?

SEMPER FI

ONCE A MARINE, ALWAYS A MARINE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

To further explain, I have a NOD for CAD denial dated apr '08 requesting a DRO hearing. They told me this morning no date has been set for that hearing.I still don't believe the speed with which they handled this latest NOD, but I shall not complain.

I spoke with my SRO and he too is at a loss. He did however offer one senario.

Is it within the realm of possibility that they are combining the two NODs and holding one hearing?

Can they do that? Please help me .

SEMPER FI

ONCE A MARINE, ALWAYS A MARINE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your rep might well be correct-

what was the Jan 2009 NOD for?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New to this. Tried to copy post from another subject but couldn't so I'll try to explain again. Diagnosed DMII in Dec '06. Filed in Mar '07 for DMII, PN lower extremities, CAD (diagnosed in '01), hearing loss, loss of eyesight as secondary to DMII, and ED. Jul '07 awarded 20% DMII, 10% PN each lower extremity as secondary to DMII, denied CAD as diagnosed prior to DMII, denied ED as part and partial to DMII, denied hearing as being multifactoral, and denied eyesight as not caused by DMII. Jan '08 I had nerve conduction studies done on my hands at VA and filed for increased benefits PN upper extremities. At C&P exam, the Dr. found that I met the criteria for a diagnosis of DMII in Mar '01. Since CAD was not diagnosed until Apr '01 I immediately filed a NOD on the original CAD denial. In Jul '08 I finally got nerve conduction studies done. Was suspicious of thier mild DX because of statement made by tech doing test. So I started trying to get appt. to see pvt neurologist. Jan '09 I was awarded 10% each upper extremity PN secondary to DMII which pushed me up to 50%. I got in to a pvt dr and after extensive testing his dx is severe polyneuropathies of both upper and lower extremities w/possibility of neuropathy in lower back.

Now I think I'm up to speed. Jan '09 was increased benefitsfor PN. the first NOD was for CAD and the lightning speed NOD is for disagreement of degree of diagnosis of PN.

SEMPER FI

ONCE A MARINE, ALWAYS A MARINE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got notification from RO 15 Nov that they were combining the hearings for both of my NOD's but were waiting on a C&P exam for the PN. Did the C&P exam today. Any thoughts as to how long it usually takes after the exam before I get a hearing?

SEMPER FI

ONCE A MARINE, ALWAYS A MARINE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might find that they could make a favorable decision without the hearing-

that is a possibility here- if they have the evidence I am mentioned below-and they actually read it-

"denied CAD as diagnosed prior to DMII, "

Do you have medical statement that the CAD is as likely as not due to the DMII?

(which it most surely is in MOST cases)

(denied ED as part and partial to DMII) other more than likely-in my opinion- but I am not doctor-

so any of your meds have ED as side effect of the meds?

"denied eyesight as not caused by DMII."

Do you have atherosclerotic heart disease-

meaning did you ever get ECHO that gave low ejection fraction?

any high cholestrol problems?

any hyperlipedemia?

Is your vision problem due to cataracts?

Can you possibly scan and attach the decision? (cover the personal stuff)

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta

I have DMII and a cataract. The VA doctor said there was no relationship. Should I bother to claim this since I am going to go outside the VA to get it fixed? I thought if you had DMII and cataracts it was almost presumptive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use