Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Another Newb With ?s

Rate this question


My Monster

Question

Long story short, jarhead retired after 20, hated going to sick call even if limbs were hanging on with a band aid, now a dependent. My questions are as follows...

1. How much weight is given to a Final Physical as far as evidence for a claim is given? (Doc wrote down quite a bit that I should of gone to med for but never did, i.e. knees (shattered left knee cap due to a basketball game for PT, ringing in the ears, broke left big toe, CTS, broken thumbs...)

2. I just received my "big brown envelope" asking me if I would like to present any more evidence for my claim before the VA attempts to rate me. I am a retired dependent and just had x-rays and MRI's done on my back and knees. The write up for the x-rays state bone spur's in my lower lumbar, DDD, and arthritis in my back but have not had a chance to do a report/write up on my MRIs. should I wait to include them or just have the VA rate me on what they have?

3. When will they schedule me for the C & P physicals?

Might sound like simple shit but I am clueless on this...

D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

he said they told him they don't do retirement physicals anymore????????????

Generally, no. They will do a retirement "assessment" which for me was a meeting with a flight doc and him annotating some of the chronic conditions noted in my STRs.

You can be discharged/separtated without a physical or assessment if you waive it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You would be mad to waive a physical assessment at discharge. The military should do a full physical, but you know why they don't do it? They might find something not in the records....arrgggghhhh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what I have off of my recent MRI...of course I have no idea what it means. I go in tomorrow to have it explained. I will be sending what I have to the VA next Tuesday after I get my knee MRI and the results from it. Everything I have so far is on a CD, should I send that in to the VA?

X-Ray results:

REPORT: Three views lumbar spine dated 18 November 2009.

FINDINGS: There is normal lumbar vertebral body height. The alignment is

maintained. There are anterior osteophytes noted from L2 through S1.

Ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament is present from L2 through

S1. There are mild endplate degenerative changes with a facet degenerative

arthropathy at L5-S1 with mild disk space narrowing. No fracture or

subluxation are present. The SI joint are patent bilaterally.

MRI Results

REPORT: MRI of the lumbar spine without contrast dated 03 December 2009.

COMPARISON STUDIES: Plain films of the lumbar spine dated 18 November 2009.

INDICATIONS: Low back pain radiating into both buttocks, some degenerative

change on x-rays.

TECHNIQUE: Multiplanar, multisequence magnetic resonance imaging was

performed through the lumbar spine without the use of IV gadolinium contrast.

FINDINGS: The spinal cord terminates at the level of L1. Signal

characteristics within the conus medullaris and cauda equina appear normal.

Bone marrow signal appears largely normal, with the exception of the level of

L3-4, which is discussed below. Hypertrophy is noted involving the anterior

longitudinal ligament throughout the lumbar spine together with multiple

anterior osteophytes, better characterized on plain films. Regarding

specific spinal levels, T12-L1 demonstrates small Schmorl''s nodes arising

from both the inferior endplate of T12 and the superior endplate of L1.

Surrounding marrow signal appears normal. T12-L1 otherwise appears normal.

L1-2 appears mildly desiccated and perhaps minimally narrowed. There are

also small Schmorl''s nodes superiorly and inferiorly without surrounding

edema. This level is otherwise normal. L2-3 also demonstrates small

Schmorl''s nodes. This level demonstrates a minimal posterior, right greater

than left, disk osteophyte complex; however, the central spinal canal and

both neural foramen appear patent. L3-4 also demonstrates small endplate

irregularities consistent with Schmorl''s nodes arising from both the superior

and inferior associated endplates. There is some surrounding T2 and STIR

signal intensity consistent with edema. This level also demonstrates a right

greater than left posterior disk osteophyte complex with bilateral mild facet

and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. Changes at this level result in mild

left-sided and mild-to-moderate right-sided neural foraminal narrowing. L4-5

appears minimally desiccated and narrowed. There is a mild posterior disk

osteophyte complex at this level. Bilateral facet hypertrophy and ligamentum

flavum hypertrophy contribute to mild bilateral neural foraminal narrowing.

The central spinal canal appears patent. L5-S1 appears mildly desiccated and

narrowed. There is a mild posterior disk osteophyte complex at this level

also. Mild facet and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy also contribute to mild

bilateral neural foraminal narrowing.

IMPRESSION:

1. Multilevel lumbar spondylosis as detailed above, with changes likely

greatest at the level of L3-4.

2. L3-4 with possible mild edema surrounding endplate irregularities

consistent with small Schmorl''s nodes. These may represent symptomatic

Schmorl''s nodes.

th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just retired,

They just dont call it a retirement physical anymore. It is the same physical as anyone gets but the part one is at the Army Hospital and part two is at QTC locations which verify all the claims and do the C and Ps for the claimed processes. This is for the Army process. I went to Fort Knox hospital for part one, and civilian contracted Doc's for part 2.

the DAV rep at Knox is awesome BTW...

" The enemy controls everything, the roads, the bombs, they even own when and where they will attack. But the second they make the mistake to attack, we own them" ME, reference to insurgents in Iraq

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use