Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Should I File?

Rate this question


Sgt Schmidt

Question

I have been told by many of the doctors I see that I'm borderline diabetic and to watch my diet. The last readings I had for my blood surgar were 124, 124, 147, and 178. I know I should ask for a A1C test but it will be 2 or 3 months before I see my VA PCP. Should I file a claim for DMII or wait until I get a solid diagnosis.

Sorry if this has been answered in a previous post.

Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

That is a hard one to call-the HBIAC test would confirm whether or not you are diabetic.

Were these Oral Glucose Tolerance tests results?

If you do not have hyperlipedemia in your work work or any high Tryglycide readings- maybe best to wait.

Also abnormal BUN and creatinine levels can suggest diabetes too but your doctor has surely considered all of those factors already.

Watching one's diet and getting exercize is the best way to avoid this disease.

Diabetes doesn't kill anyone-it's complications do.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My cholesterol levels are always high, (upper 200 to 300 range) and my triglycerides were over 900 when I had my liver and lipid profiles done the first time by my family doc. The tests were done from blood work up.

Jeff

That is a hard one to call-the HBIAC test would confirm whether or not you are diabetic.

Were these Oral Glucose Tolerance tests results?

If you do not have hyperlipedemia in your work work or any high Tryglycide readings- maybe best to wait.

Also abnormal BUN and creatinine levels can suggest diabetes too but your doctor has surely considered all of those factors already.

Watching one's diet and getting exercize is the best way to avoid this disease.

Diabetes doesn't kill anyone-it's complications do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My cholesterol levels are always high, (upper 200 to 300 range) and my triglycerides were over 900 when I had my liver and lipid profiles done the first time by my family doc. The tests were done from blood work up.

Jeff

I'd want to know what those liver enzymes test test results were all about.....high lipids and triglicerides can elevate liver enzymes and high numbers in the cholesterol and tricligercide arena are not good for the liver at all....fatty liver.

As Berta mentions, it's not the DM2 that's the killer, it's the complications and more importantly, not doing anything about them. I'd get on that one like now. Creatinine measures your kidney function so were I you, I'd want that Hemoglobin A1C test done, and even then....it only gives the doctor an "average" blood sugar for the previous 3 months....it's the highs and lows, the peaks in sugar and the drops in blood sugar that do the damage. Keeping your blood sugar within guidelines as much as possible to avoid those peaks and valleys are best - and, if you do so, your A1C will always be within the norm.

My husband was dx diabetic in 1992, sugar over 400, classic symptoms of excessive thirst, nighttime leg cramps, lost his crystal clear eye sight for 4 months....and it wasn't until then he finally went to the doctor (doctors are the worst patients). As soon as the sugar levels dropped, his eyesight came back, leg cramps ended and he did eventually need insulin. Diet and exercise was not enough. AO destroyed his pancreas and so be it. Without insulin, he wouldn't be here today. We used to treat the diabetes as a daily battle......now, 17 years later, we treat it as a daily "adjustment". His endo doc is private practice and the smartest cookie in the jar with absolutely no personality. We don't need a doctor with personality, the smartest cookie (no pun intended) is more important. This guy can figure out exactly how many calories my husband is consuming by looking at his weight, his blood tests, A1C and his log book. It took my husband the former doctor to realize after 10 years he wasn't getting anything by this guy and so he now listens to his advice and follows it.

Good Luck to you....

VetsLady and, Proud to Be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Sgt

If the readings you quote were fasting glucose levels I think you probably do have DmII. I would file for it. Until some doctor states you have DMII it does not matter what your tests say. Get the C&P exam at least because you are so close to constant readings above 126 and that is the artificial cutoff. Do you have any secondary conditions you know about? You can have artery disease where there is calcification building up in your arteries and you won't even know it, but that is a sure sign something ain't right. A CT scan of your legs will show it. The big worry to me is that with your high levels cholesterol there is a build up of plac in your arteries and DMII makes it worse. This may lead to heart disease and/or stroke. You should try to get a DX of DMII before you fill but I think I would file anyway. I filed when I had fasting glucose levels over 126 but not much over. The C&P doctor took one look at my numbers and took a look at my lower legs and said "You got it all right".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 4 stints, high blood pressure, glucoma, and COPD + chronic brochitis. I was also told I had a leaky heart valve the last time I had a cath done. When I had my heart attack back in 06 they said 12% of my heart muscle was damaged.

I go in this Friday for another heart cath and echo because of chest pain and shortness of breath without very little exertion. If I split 2 pieces of wood I get chest pain, etc. My cardiologist said not to split wood or even play golf in my front yard. :-) Basically, do nothing!!!

Hopefully they can get all my pipes cleaned out this time. :-)

Jeff

PS - I would just like to thank everyone in/on this forum for all the suggestions, help, and friendliness. This is defentantly a "GREAT" group.....

Sgt

If the readings you quote were fasting glucose levels I think you probably do have DmII. I would file for it. Until some doctor states you have DMII it does not matter what your tests say. Get the C&P exam at least because you are so close to constant readings above 126 and that is the artificial cutoff. Do you have any secondary conditions you know about? You can have artery disease where there is calcification building up in your arteries and you won't even know it, but that is a sure sign something ain't right. A CT scan of your legs will show it. The big worry to me is that with your high levels cholesterol there is a build up of plac in your arteries and DMII makes it worse. This may lead to heart disease and/or stroke. You should try to get a DX of DMII before you fill but I think I would file anyway. I filed when I had fasting glucose levels over 126 but not much over. The C&P doctor took one look at my numbers and took a look at my lower legs and said "You got it all right".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use