Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Substantial Gainful Work And Periods Of Remission

Rate this question


deltaj

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is a really interesting, favorable case that was decided in the Federal Circuit on November 21, 1996. The case citation is 100 F3d 1389 Gregory Andler v. Shirley Chater, Commissioner of Social Security. The Federal Circuit seemed to state that an error was made in failing to consider that the periods that Gregory Andler worked and exceeded the poverty threshold were periods where his mental illness was in remission between hospitalizations. The Court stated these periods where the veteran worked during 2 summers should have been viewed as unsuccessful work attempts and ordered that he be considered disabled. I can see the applicability of this to my husband's case because when he tried to work in 1990 he was between hospitalizations yet V.A. only considered his wages from 1990 in the decision.

Could someone put up a link to this case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Now here is a thought - about the working thing - (not about the Poster with Housebound)-

Keep in mind that some people with mental disabilities sometimes have trouble making decisions that are in their best interest. That is sometimes part of their disability. And some mental disabilities are more cyclical in nature.

I know a woman who is bipolar. She goes through phases where she could work just as well as anyone. And she goes through phases where she is out of control and hospitalized. (She lost her last job when she stripped down naked at work and refused to put her clothes back on until the police got there.[she was the manager, by the way.] But she could go out tomorrow and act very professional and get hired somewhere.)

I could very well see people with certain mental illnesses deciding to go back to work, even if it is not in their best interest. And / Or being able to work for awhile and not be able to sustain the employment.

They are still disabled.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Question- did the VA recognize or award you IU for the last day you worked gainful or Non-Gainfully?

Thank you,

Cg'up!

Part of an IU claim is the part when you have to tell the VA the last day you worked. If you file for IU and then go to work in the meantime that is going to casue a problem. When I got IU I had to submit a document from my employer stating the last day I was in a work status. I got disability retirement so I had the exact paperwork they needed. I don't know how carefully they check this, but if they find you have lied to them your ass is grass.

I really agree with TestVet. If you get IU why would you want to put it at risk. It often takes years to get it. I would love to be able to go back to work and earn a good living. Since that is not going to happen I have to live with IU. Without IU I would be hurting just like all of us who get 100%.

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA granted me IU based on the last day I actually worked at the Post Office. I was on the post office employment rolls for a longer period but I did not work. I was on unpaid leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA granted me IU based on the last day I actually worked at the Post Office. I was on the post office employment rolls for a longer period but I did not work. I was on unpaid leave.

That makes sense - as you were not actually earning your income during unpaid leave.

I would also encourage people who miss a lot of work or have to cut their hours way back at the very end of their working career to ask the period where their earnings are below substantial gainful to be considered.

And this might be a situation that affects many vets. They keep working and trying to make it until they can't work any more. If their earnings are not substantial at the tail end of that job - because of their disability - they should ask that period of time to be considered -not just the last day they dragged their body into work.

When my husband applied for SSA - the worker just put my husband's last day of work on the application (December 2006). We asked her to consider the period from the time he last earned substantial gainful (July 2006). They granted him disability back to July. (Of course July was considered the first month of his waiting period).

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

About two years ago I came to the conclusion that a married couple literally can not live on a 100% VA pension.

Cruinthe,

Can I ask, if you are getting housebound - have you applied for SSDI?

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
That makes sense - as you were not actually earning your income during unpaid leave.

I would also encourage people who miss a lot of work or have to cut their hours way back at the very end of their working career to ask the period where their earnings are below substantial gainful to be considered.

And this might be a situation that affects many vets. They keep working and trying to make it until they can't work any more. If their earnings are not substantial at the tail end of that job - because of their disability - they should ask that period of time to be considered -not just the last day they dragged their body into work.

When my husband applied for SSA - the worker just put my husband's last day of work on the application (December 2006). We asked her to consider the period from the time he last earned substantial gainful (July 2006). They granted him disability back to July. (Of course July was considered the first month of his waiting period).

Yes it's the last day you actually earned income mine was June 2002 the VA did the heart cath in Oct and SSD was approved 4 months later back dated to June then 5 months of SS wait period check was effective Dec 2002 it's easier to talk sense to a SS employee not so easy with VA employees

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use