Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Amc..how To Keep Your Claim Out Of There?

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Lead Moderator

Is anyone familiar with the AMC..that is, specifically how do I keep my claim from going there? I have heard horror stories, that the

AMC is like the "Roach Motel" in that once you check in to the AMC your claim will never get out of there. Is this the place where the VA holds claim appeals while they wait for the Veteran to die? No one that I have ever heard of has ever gotten a claim out of AMC successfully..if you have, please speak up. Others, however, have said something about their claim being at AMC for 5 years while nothing happens on it.

I can not understand the purpose of AMC. Do they forward claims to the BVA or CAVC? Do they decide claims? Is this the headquarters of the "Bureau of Bureacracy" of the VA, because I thought it was ALL VA employees job to complicate and confuse each Veteran to delay his claim for as long as possible rather than have that done all at the AMC.

Please post your experience at AMC, good, bad, or indifferent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

Thank you for your responses. It sounds like your claim going to AMC is worse than your claim going to the shredder bin, because if your claim was shredded, you at least have some chance at reconstructing it, but once it goes to the AMC it means it will be delayed forever. Maybe, if/when my claim goes to the BVA, I will beg them to either approve, or deny my claim but to never send it to the "AMC BLACK HOLE" where it will be forever delayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes amc is black hole my claim was remaned there it was to be expidated due to my hardships my claim was there 5month before i started looking for number to call i left messages. i talk to some team guy he look at my claim and say oh u are right this is to be expidated. needless to say i took 1 more month denied. when back to bva granted now back at amc and they are to handle my retro i been 3 week and not even a letter. so i guess i get my retro in 3 month. and its 94-2001. this is not right thank for letting me vent i am mad as ----.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

hurryup

You have a good lawyer. The thing I see is that if you have a claim with a potential retro back to 1973 your DRO may not have the guts to grant such a claim. He will palm it off on the BVA. He does not want to be the guy who grants a vet a few hundred thousand dollars in retro. This is exactly what happened with my claim that went to the DRO with my lawyer. We were asking for money back to 1971. My claim seemed pretty plain to me and my lawyer, but the DRO must have gotten the word that no way in hell were they going to grant such a claim. I bet the DRO ran my claim by someone higher up and they put the kabosh on it. Now I am waiting for my BVA hearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hurryup

You have a good lawyer. The thing I see is that if you have a claim with a potential retro back to 1973 your DRO may not have the guts to grant such a claim. He will palm it off on the BVA. He does not want to be the guy who grants a vet a few hundred thousand dollars in retro. This is exactly what happened with my claim that went to the DRO with my lawyer. We were asking for money back to 1971. My claim seemed pretty plain to me and my lawyer, but the DRO must have gotten the word that no way in hell were they going to grant such a claim. I bet the DRO ran my claim by someone higher up and they put the kabosh on it. Now I am waiting for my BVA hearing.

Hi John

Yes, I m aware that it may have to go the BVA, Ken Carpenter has asked for a partial award back to 2004 for TDIU, which we are hoping they will grant. The open claim to 1973 will prolly be headed to the BVA, where it was noted in the remand letter, the first time at the BVA, that no decision letter was ever sent to me after I went for a C&P exam, therefore the claim is still open.

Happy Trails

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

John..

Yes, that is very frustrating when the RO simply wont award those large retros..they pass em on the BVA. There is a recent case that pointed out that it is illegal for the Va to send only large retros to VACO, supervisors, etc. The Va does it to save money, but it is under the guise that it reduces fraud. It does not. The employee-frauds easily circumvent this system by simply awarding retros a bit smaller than the minimum. That is, when they check retros over 250k or 10 years, the frauds simply submit retros of $225k so they avoid this fraud check. It does not reduce fraud, it creates a loophole to enhance it. It is like putting a security guard at the front door and leaving the back door wide open.

Another way to look at is they are putting a combination lock on the door, where the combination is on a sticky note 3 feet from the lock.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Paul

Wow, a vet here recently won a huge retro award on a claim that was still open way back from the 70's. I believe he filed it as a CUE, but the VA treated it like a claim that was still open. He had the facts in black and white about how the VA blew it . It is a good idea to get the TDIU and then continue the fight to get the big retro. It is a lot easier to sleep at night knowing you have a decent check coming in every month. I think if Ken Carpenter has confidence in your claim you are going to be in for a big payday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use