Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Shredding Veterans Documents Continues At Roanoke

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Lead Moderator

Once again Veterans documents were in the shredder bin at Roanoke. This is AFTER fast letter 08-41 expired so that Veteran victims have no recourse against the VA. No "special handling" will be allowed as this Veteran's documents were shredded outside of the Apr 07-Oct 08 limiting dates the fast letter specifies.

The VAOIG did not even put this incident in the highlights of the report, but rather buried it in the body where it would not be noticed except by those who read the whole report. Obviously, whether or not Veterans claims are shredded is not important enough to include it in the highlights of the inspection, and the VAOIG made no references that anything was to be done about it, except to blame a "careless employee". (Gee, I wonder who hired 'careless employees'?)

I thought the VA had "put controls into place" to prevent future shredding incidents. These were either not in place in Roanoke, or they were ineffective at preventing shredding from continuing.

You have to read the VAOIG's report, Larry Scott, also, did not even mention the shredding.

http://www.vawatchdog.org/10/nf10/nfjan10/nf011510-4.htm

The VA website lists what the VA is doing to prevent shredding...it did not work.

http://www.vba.va.gov/vba/specialprocedures_qa.asp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

The solution is simple. Do away with the so called incentive "bonuses". This bonus is paid for shredding and or losing VA Claims folder----there is no accountability, just lose or shred the claims file. The federal govt just learned a valuable lesson with our tax money by bailing out these banks---the CEO's and other high ranking bank officials used the money to fund their bonuses. That is correct---they (bankers) got their bonus for failure. Now, Obama is trying to go after them. KNOCK OFF the VARO bonus. May be the VA Claim's will pile up, but there would be less incentive to SHRED. Pay the employees overtime, shred the BONUS. Rewarding people for failure---just does not work. We have seen it with the Banks and the VA. Am I missing something (?) or do I understand correctly: bonus is (should be) paid for going above and beyond average normal production expected of an employee. VA fast letter? It should be called a VA "farce" letter. The VA Central Office tries to correct the problem with a band aid---but it needs a full battle dressing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm shredding right now but "don't worry" it's not your file.

Shredding is great security and I do it regularily. I have a cross-cut shredder.

jerr

Once again Veterans documents were in the shredder bin at Roanoke. This is AFTER fast letter 08-41 expired so that Veteran victims have no recourse against the VA. No "special handling" will be allowed as this Veteran's documents were shredded outside of the Apr 07-Oct 08 limiting dates the fast letter specifies.

The VAOIG did not even put this incident in the highlights of the report, but rather buried it in the body where it would not be noticed except by those who read the whole report. Obviously, whether or not Veterans claims are shredded is not important enough to include it in the highlights of the inspection, and the VAOIG made no references that anything was to be done about it, except to blame a "careless employee". (Gee, I wonder who hired 'careless employees'?)

I thought the VA had "put controls into place" to prevent future shredding incidents. These were either not in place in Roanoke, or they were ineffective at preventing shredding from continuing.

You have to read the VAOIG's report, Larry Scott, also, did not even mention the shredding.

http://www.vawatchdog.org/10/nf10/nfjan10/nf011510-4.htm

The VA website lists what the VA is doing to prevent shredding...it did not work.

http://www.vba.va.gov/vba/specialprocedures_qa.asp

Edited by jerrbilly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Of course, VMO is right, and that is precisely why many Veterans are so upset. WE have a million Veterans backlog on claims, with zero backlog of VA executive bonus backlog. If I had my way, VA executives would wait ten years on their bonus check, while Veterans would get theirs is 2 weeks, instead of the other way around like it is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shredding is ridiculous....as is the incentive bonuses.....It is quite simple the incentive bonus should be "do the work or lose your job", surely that should be enough of an incentive. If you are not meeting the quota you should be disciplined. I mean what the hell IS GOING ON?????

Why is the VA giving people monetary bonuses to do their jobs properly and there are veterans who are homeless waiting for their benefits to be approved! I always thought the Vet was the Priority, and that is why the VA was created. Apparently they have lost some serious focus.

The focus seems to be, keep the employees happy and that's about it!

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr....

We are a Vietnam vet and vet's wife, we are not lawyers or VSO's we're just learning as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use