Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

In Rating.....what Does This Mean?!

Rate this question


Angelo Hurtado

Question

  • Answers 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

I know it means they are making a decision on my claim, but is it being in rating a good thing? as in, it isnt denied or am I doing some wishful thinking?!

Angelo.

It simply means VBA is still working on your claim.

Don't listen to most anything the 800 # tells you.

They are not set up to be able to provide accurate

answers on claims status.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmm..so i should at least get 50% for ptsd? it went into rating without even having a c&p...im so confused when it comes to dealing with the va

Angelo,

GAF is a snapshot in time.

PTSD percentage levels are not solely based on GAF scores,

much more goes into adjudicating the percentage levels for PTSD

than GAF scores.

You post, "it went into rating without even having a c&p..",

it's probably still in pre-determination and a decision maker

has yet to order a C&P examination.

Also, I do not feel a GAF score of 72 will be helpful in a 50 percent award.

jmho,

carlie

Also, below is a quote from a member that rarely posts, but he

is a lLicensed Clinical Psychologist and this post might be helpful

in understanding things a bit more.

http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=30015

I am a former C and P examiner and a Clinical Psychologist with two tours in Vietnam with Marine Force Recon. I am 100% P and T and SSDI. I will clarify what a GAF score means in an evaluation. A GAF scores is much like your blood pressure it never stays the same through the day. You may have a GAF of 35 in the morning then have one of 55 in the afternoon. I will debate the importance of a GAF score as it is a predictor of behavior over a period of time. Going into a C and P with just one evaluation will not generate the rating you will get. But a veteran who has been in treatment for a long period of time has a longitudinal record of GAF scores. There are 10 parts to a C and P examination and GAF is one of them. The one that counts the most is if the examiner also diagnoses one with PTSD or what other mental health disorder one has.

Your history especially military history and combat awards go a long way as does the GAF score. Then it is the severity specifier on Axis I and the severity rating on Axis IV that will allow the raters to make an appropriate rating.

Patrick

Edited by carlie
more info

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you rated now for PTSD or are you even rated for it? Maybe I missed something here.

My understanding is you are already rated and have put in for increase. Lets say you're at 30% and your last GAF was 72 the VA will springboard off this in a bad way. Even though they don't look at GAF like they do your actually history they will use a high GAF to deny a higher rating.

In other words, a low GAF they won't consider as much but a high GAF (benefits them) and they will use it as leverage.

jerr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the replys,

broncovet and john999:

yea i know the fuzzy math by the va. i did the calculator on this site and my final math would be 94.3 haha... .7 away from being 100% (if i get it)

carlie:

once again, great help! i get what ur saying on the gaf score...and it makes sense.

i had a c&p scheduled back in late november but they scheduled it in san diego, i live in sacramento. so i asked to have them reschedule it to a little more closer than a 8/9 hour drive. then i called again after the holidays and they told me that my claim had went into rating dec 11th.

i ran this by member known as LarryJ, and he told me it could be a great sign, that when the va does this they are just submitting to giving me the claim...that c&p exams are ways for the va to find how to deny u.

jerrbilly:

im not rated for ptsd, this claim is my first claim for it but i am rated 80% already. my vso submitted for the ptsd (new claim) and then a (what he told me) request for increase/tdiu claim (just in case the ptsd doesnt get me to 100%) so i dont know much past that on what the papers are.

thanks everyone for there help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The AMC kept telling me for a year that my claim was being rated.

It wasn't even assigned to anyone to rate the whole time.

Once someone is actually assigned to the claim to rate it, it still takes a good deal of time before an SOC is issued. Always expect to be either denied or low balled & you will be far less disappointed in the claims handling process.

There is little they tell you that can be believed.

If it actually went to a rater in Dec-09, you may hear something by spring at the earliest. Denials are sometimes faster since they shoot them out the door with little bases, if any at all.

Those vets who are suffering financially, may need to go on state aide for disability until their VA claims are worked out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weird thing happen yesterday, after posting my last message my wife walks in with the mail and i have a letter from the va saying "sorry for the delay, ur claimis still being processed" so i guess i have alot longer to go :0(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use