Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Claim Still At The Bva !

Rate this question


bm6546

Question

My claim is still sitting at the BVA in Washington DC since Jan 09. The last time I checked it was still at the AL in Washington. My original claim was filed at the RO in June 06. Can anyone tell me when I might hear something on this almost 4 year old claim? I have heard nothing from the VA in over a year.

Would it help if I call the 800# or sent an IRIS e-mail? My local VSO office has 2 VERY NEW people there and I'm not sure how much help they would be.

Any help would be appreciated.

Brian

I've waited this long and I'm not giving up....NEVER!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Brian, Be sure to use the form or format of Carlie's post. If you submit additional evidence, you must "waive" the adjudication or review of this evidence by your RO. If you do not file this "waiver", your file will be pulled from the BVA, and sent to the RO for consideration this new evidence. Since the VA mailrooms are notoriously hellish, I suggest Faxing whenever possible. Test your first fax page to make sure it gets received! `Wings

Wings, I just replied to Carlie and will ask you the same question. I am filing a new claim secondary to my heart claim. If my claim is pulled from the BVA by the RO, will I lose my place in line by doing this? Will the BVA accept a new claim if it is secondary to my claim that is currently waiting for review?

Would this be a new claim or additional evidence? Very confusing!!

Thanks, Brian

I've waited this long and I'm not giving up....NEVER!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Brian

It sounds like your claim has been at the BVA for over a year waiting for a hearing. What my lawyer did when the DRO denied we asked the BVA for a traveling board. That took about 7 months. Now we had the hearing and are waiting for whatever they decide. I got a copy of the transcript of the hearing. I sent it to the lawyer. There were mistakes and misspellings. Pretty awful, but it was accurate in general. It was very short as it is a CUE so the evidence is all there in front of them. Who knows what will happen with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Wings, I just replied to Carlie and will ask you the same question. I am filing a new claim secondary to my heart claim. If my claim is pulled from the BVA by the RO, will I lose my place in line by doing this? Will the BVA accept a new claim if it is secondary to my claim that is currently waiting for review?

Would this be a new claim or additional evidence? Very confusing!!

Thanks, Brian

Brain, I would think it SOP for the BVA to make their own copy of the claims-file, but my experience tells me they generally send the claims-file back to the RO when a new claim is filed. I would like others opinions! ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question to you and anyone else that can help me is this:

1. I am meeting with my VSO tomorrow am and we are going to file a new claim for depression and anxiety secondary to my heart problems (This is the claim that is currently at the BVA) Should I send this new claim to my RO or should I sign the "Waiver of Regional Office Consideration" form so it will go directly to the BVA.

bm6546,

Did you not follow through in Jan 2007 and file a claim for depression/anxiety ?

Probably not, as the primary condition has not yet been SC'd and you say your MH is secondary to it.

http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=7220&hl=

If you never followed through with the Mental Health (MH) claim

and received a decision on it and filed a NOD and a form 9 on it-

then NO - it would not be under the BVA's jurisdiction for adjudication.

If none of the above steps have been done for MH, you need to file for your MH conditions at the VARO level.

A Waiver of RO consideration at the BVA has nothing to do with a filing

for an additional disability at the VARO.

Also - since you are attempting to get a rating for a MH disability

as secondary to a cardiac (heart problems) -

the cardiac condition MUST be SC'd prior to even a possibility

of the MH disability being granted.

I think there are some things your VSO may not be aware of.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brain, I would think it SOP for the BVA to make their own copy of the claims-file, but my experience tells me they generally send the claims-file back to the RO when a new claim is filed. I would like others opinions! ~Wings

Wings, I met with my VSO yesterday and we called the American Legion in Washington. The rep told me I have a doc date and that any new claims I file will not change my position at the BVA level. She told me to go ahead and file the new claim with my local RO and that will probably get me a new C&P exam. She said the RO may request my C file from the BVA and the BVA would LEND it to the RO in 21 days increments. If the BVA wants my file back the RO HAS to send it back ASAP.

I called a clinical psychologist (LM) and we are playing phone tag. Hopefully I can meet with her next week and see if she will give me a opinion on my anxiety secondary to my PAT. I will keep you informed with my progress.

Brian

Note: I have a doc date of Jan 08 with the BVA. They are currently working on the second quarter of 2006.

I've waited this long and I'm not giving up....NEVER!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian

It sounds like your claim has been at the BVA for over a year waiting for a hearing. What my lawyer did when the DRO denied we asked the BVA for a traveling board. That took about 7 months. Now we had the hearing and are waiting for whatever they decide. I got a copy of the transcript of the hearing. I sent it to the lawyer. There were mistakes and misspellings. Pretty awful, but it was accurate in general. It was very short as it is a CUE so the evidence is all there in front of them. Who knows what will happen with it.

john999

Yes it has been over a year. I have a doc date of Jan 08. They are currently working on second quarter of 2006. Have no idea how much longer it will be. At what point do you think I should think about hiring a lawyer?

Brian

I've waited this long and I'm not giving up....NEVER!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use