Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Is This A 1151 Claim?

Rate this question


KennyJ

Question

I was recently diagnosed by VAMC stomach disorder and acid reflux. In the past I have been on several nsaids. One time an incompent doctor had me on 3 at same time which is a medical no no. I was told by VAMC doctor today that since I was taking nsaids on a daily basis up to 3 times a day, that I should have been on some type of stomach medicine. VAMC never recommended any type of medicication for protection to my stomach and esophagus. Their non recommendation has lead to my problems. Is there any way that I can get any compensation from this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes and 1151 claim should do the trick. Berta knows a lot about this.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

U.S. Code as of: 01/26/1998

Sec. 1151. Benefits for persons disabled by treatment or vocational rehabilitation

(a) Compensation under this chapter and dependency and indemnity compensation under chapter 13 of this title shall be awarded for a qualifying additional disability or a qualifying death of a veteran in the same manner as if such additional disability or death were service-connected.

For purposes of this section, a disability or death is a qualifying additional disability or qualifying death if the disability or death was not the result of the veteran's willful misconduct AND -

(1) the disability or death was caused by hospital care, medical or surgical treatment, or examination furnished the veteran under any law administered by the Secretary, either by a Department employee or in a Department facility as defined in section 1701(3)(A) of this title, and the proximate cause of the disability or death was -

(A) carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on the part of the Department in furnishing the hospital care, medical or surgical treatment, or examination; OR

(B) an event not reasonably foreseeable; OR

(2) the disability or death was proximately caused by the provision of training and rehabilitation services by the Secretary (including by a service-provider used by the Secretary for such purpose under section 3115 of this title) as part of an approved rehabilitation program under chapter 31 of this title.

(b) Where an individual is, on or after December 1, 1962, awarded a judgment against the United States in a civil action brought pursuant to section 1346(b) of title 28 or, on or after December 1, 1962, enters into a settlement or compromise under section 2672 or 2677 of title 28 by reason of a disability or death treated

pursuant to this section as if it were service-connected, then no benefits shall be paid to such individual for any month beginning after the date such judgment, settlement, or compromise on account of such disability or death becomes final until the aggregate amount of benefits which would be paid but for this subsection

equals the total amount included in such judgment, settlement, or compromise.

Source

Pub. L. 85-857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1124, Sec. 351;

Pub. L. 87-825, Sec. 3, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 950;

Pub. L. 91-24, Sec. 3, June 11, 1969, 83 Stat. 33;

Pub. L. 94-433, title IV, Sec. 404(19), Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1379;

Pub. L. 98-223, title II, Sec. 213(1), Mar. 2, 1984, 98 Stat. 46;

renumbered Sec. 1151 and amended Pub. L. 102-83, Sec. 4(a)(1), 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 403, 406;

Pub. L. 104-204, title IV, Sec. 422(a), Sept. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 2926.

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

MEDICAL DISABILITY [Section 1151] VERSUS MEDICAL MALPRACTICE [TORT]: COMPENSATION FOR INJURY/DISABILITY AND THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS by JENNIFER DOWD WHITTINGTON, J.D.

http://www.afip.org/Departments/legalmed/openfile97/va97.pdf

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as you can prove additional documented disability(at ratable level)-and I think you can-just send them:

VACO C file number name adress etc (send certified)

To whom it may concern:

This is a claim under Section 1151 ,38 USC.

I fully believe that my VA medical records will reveal that I have received medication which has been inappropriate and improper medical treatment, when compared to medical standards regarding same as found consistent with the usual medical community and as a result of that medical error, on VA's part, I have acquired an additional disability.

Just sign it and see how they respond.

I never tell them too much in 1151s because it gives them a chance to put their foot in their mouth and they might find out more errors then just the medication one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as you can prove additional documented disability(at ratable level)-and I think you can-just send them:

VACO C file number name adress etc (send certified)

To whom it may concern:

This is a claim under Section 1151 ,38 USC.

I fully believe that my VA medical records will reveal that I have received medication which has been inappropriate and improper medical treatment, when compared to medical standards regarding same as found consistent with the usual medical community and as a result of that medical error, on VA's part, I have acquired an additional disability.

Just sign it and see how they respond.

I never tell them too much in 1151s because it gives them a chance to put their foot in their mouth and they might find out more errors then just the medication one.

Hi there Folk's

This brings up another question about my case. What if it wasn't the VA but the military that performed the actual act of malpractice. Where do I go then...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way to go on military malpractice-

the Feres doctrine prohibits claims like this against the mil-

http://www.dod.mil/dfas/retiredpay/concurr...rdpandcrsc.html

Having said that-however- wasn't there a few anthrax lawsuits against the mil?

One thing is for sure-once an active duty person becomes a veteran- time ticks away anyhow and there could well be a military Statute of Limits even if someone could get around the Feres doctrine somehow-

If a VA hosp continues a malpracticed event -like say the mil said you had a condition that you really didnt have- and then the VA-without proper testing and assessment -continues to medicate and treat you for this erroneous condition-overlooking the actual cause of it- to your detriment-you could potential succeed in a Sec 1151 claim or a FTCA claim if you are within the 2 year statute for FTCA-against the VA not the military.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use