Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Just Got Soc

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Lead Moderator

I am considering asking for a "Motion for Reconsideration" or even, as Berta has suggested, asking the vA to Cue themselves, because I really do not want to wait another 4 years at the BVA.

I am in a dispute with the VA for my effective date. Essentially, I am contending that, at a VA medical professional's offfice, I made an informal claim for benefits years ago.

I am just curios if you think it will do any good to ask for a MFR or ask the VA to Cue themselves. I only have 60 days to file an I9, or I will "loose" the possibility of an appeal. Do you think its ok to ask for a MFR at the same time I appeal, or, ask the VA to CUE themselves concurrently with this appeal? Thanks..Bronco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Whatever you do, don't allow the time to expire. You can ask anything you wish, remembering that--

The DVA is easily confused. They will likely interpret anything you say or write to their benefit, not yours.

The regs are fairly clear that actions at a VA clinic or med professional's office do not constitute a claim, informal or not.

Sending a letter from you to the VARO can be an informal claim.

Perhaps an exception would be if you had sent a letter to the VARO from the med Prof's office, with both you and the prof. signing.

I am considering asking for a "Motion for Reconsideration" or even, as Berta has suggested, asking the vA to Cue themselves, because I really do not want to wait another 4 years at the BVA.

I am in a dispute with the VA for my effective date. Essentially, I am contending that, at a VA medical professional's office, I made an informal claim for benefits years ago.

I am just curios if you think it will do any good to ask for a MFR or ask the VA to Cue themselves. I only have 60 days to file an I9, or I will "loose" the possibility of an appeal. Do you think its ok to ask for a MFR at the same time I appeal, or, ask the VA to CUE themselves concurrently with this appeal? Thanks..Bronco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am considering asking for a "Motion for Reconsideration" or even, as Berta has suggested, asking the vA to Cue themselves, because I really do not want to wait another 4 years at the BVA.

I am in a dispute with the VA for my effective date. Essentially, I am contending that, at a VA medical professional's offfice, I made an informal claim for benefits years ago.

I am just curios if you think it will do any good to ask for a MFR or ask the VA to Cue themselves. I only have 60 days to file an I9, or I will "loose" the possibility of an appeal. Do you think its ok to ask for a MFR at the same time I appeal, or, ask the VA to CUE themselves concurrently with this appeal? Thanks..Bronco.

I like the "CUE themselves" because you can point out the mistake and direct them to the info you want them to focus on. It's also something not commonly used by vets and it will certainly get their attention.

JMO,

Bergie

As a combat veteran, or any veteran for that matter!!!

If you thought the fighting was over when you came home, got out, or when the politicians said it was over.

Welcome to the real fight, welcome to VA claims!!!

"Just sayin"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

CUE only happens after the claim is done with no appeals or deadlines left.

The best way in my opinion is to talk to the rater by asking for a Hearing. At least you can present your evidence and ask the rater what their thinking is on your claim.

Plus having a face on the claim helps. All this is provided that you ask the RO to help you and don't pull off a rant. Just my opinion

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how long does one wait after one asks VA to "Cue themselves" before one starts making more noise? BVA actually noted my CUE Issues in my award for DIC in January 2010. I have already provided all the evidence they need to make a favorable decision (and since they really screwed up on their denials, a favorable decision is the only logical decision to be made). My claim was sent to St. Paul, Minn for completion of the DIC, and as far as I know the file is still there. Anchorage is my home VARO.

Just asking on this relevent issue....

Edited by akwidow

"Do one thing every day that scares you." Eleanor Roosevelt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bergie asked

"I like the "CUE themselves" because you can point out the mistake and direct them to the info you want them to focus on. It's also something not commonly used by vets and it will certainly get their attention."

Bergie I did this last year and in 2007 because I noticed that from time to time in BVA decisions- (it sure doesn't happen often)-the BVA stated the VA had called a clear and unmistakable error on themselves in a decision they had made.

I figured -if we have to wait for denial and expiration of appeal period to file a CUE on them-why not then ask them to CUE themselves During the appeal period.

I asked them to Cue their May 2009 award letter, then 2 more subsequent awards letters since.Maybe three and in my post today in the DIC forum-

I intend to do it again.

I feel this way- (obviously my idea worked for me)----

if you get a decision that contains obvious legal errors- that are detrimental to your claim-

in a decision ( even in an award letter)

asking them to call CUE on themselves-got me much faster responses from them then preparing a NOD.

And every time you get the VA to respond to you- there is chance they will put a foot in their mouth by stating something else you can use against them.

In 2007 I asked them to CUE themselves via Iris and that worked-I got a new DRO review.

(But it appeared that my vet rep at the time screwed up royally because although he said he presented my IMOs (2 at that time)to the DRO the SSOC never mentioned he did that.I should have asked them to again CUE the SSOC.but I didnt)

You must raise the legal error they made per the regs.I used both the regs and M21-1 to get them to CUE themselves.If they violate M21-1 that is a legal error.

Except for DTA regs.

In my last request that they CUE themselves I had to get the OGC involved.

It all depends on the type of legal error.When the OGC sent them the very same regs I had sent them-discussed in a letter and phone calls from OGC to them )then they coughed up the cash.Their legal error for that CUE defied not only a BVA statement in a BVA case I had in 2000 it also defied documented info that the OGC had.

My point is asking them to CUE themselves while a claim is still open and in appellate status (wothin NOD year) rests on having the regs completely on your side and citing the exact legal error they committed.

and it must be an error that was detrimental to your claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use