Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nvvls

Rate this question


Stretch

Question

  • In Memoriam

NATIONAL VIETNAM VETERANS LONGITUDINAL STUDY

Status Report and Update August 18, 2008

http://www.vvachapter1004.org/whitepapernvvls.pdf

Edited by Stretch

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

We are statistical lab rats. That is what the AO Registry is all about. "The Army Waiting to Die"....a book. When I deal with my VA PCP she knows nothing about AO. My pain doctor knows nothing about AO. Nobody at the VA treatment side knows anything about AO. It is written on my records "exposed to AO....Yes". This is just ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
We are statistical lab rats. That is what the AO Registry is all about. "The Army Waiting to Die"....a book. When I deal with my VA PCP she knows nothing about AO. My pain doctor knows nothing about AO. Nobody at the VA treatment side knows anything about AO. It is written on my records "exposed to AO....Yes". This is just ignored.

I have always thought that too. Thanks for the post, John9999, and thanks for the topic thread, Stretch. Just another box to check when the clerk shuffles my paperwork. What's the bigger picture??? A footnote in history???

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Bob

Guys like you who gave a leg in support of the governmen't policy of war in Vietnam should be more than a footnote in history. If you really examine the presumptive list for AO most of us surviving Nam vets will die from an AO disease. Most Americans die from either cancer or heart problems. I read every day in the obits of at least two or three Nam vets 60-65 years old who have died. Is this normal death rate? If I see a male who is in our age group who has died I check to see if he is a RVN vet. How many RVN vets are actually still alive. I had four good friends in Nam. Two are dead and one is very ill. They were all healthy young men 40 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Bob

Guys like you who gave a leg in support of the governmen't policy of war in Vietnam should be more than a footnote in history. If you really examine the presumptive list for AO most of us surviving Nam vets will die from an AO disease. Most Americans die from either cancer or heart problems. I read every day in the obits of at least two or three Nam vets 60-65 years old who have died. Is this normal death rate? If I see a male who is in our age group who has died I check to see if he is a RVN vet. How many RVN vets are actually still alive. I had four good friends in Nam. Two are dead and one is very ill. They were all healthy young men 40 years ago.

We have to beat the odds, John...

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Actually, the VA has downplayed A.O. for years, any way it can. The AO registry is no where near accurate. When an AO exposed Veteran has Diabetes II, it's a very good indicator that there are also existing heart related and metabolic problems. The VA often chooses to ignore this, and VA physicians don't even follow the VA's own treatment guides. Why should they,after all the C&P section and RO's commonly do so.

If you point blank ask a competent doctor, VA or private practice, they can easily tell you what you are at risk for. The VA doctors have one set of reasons for not telling you, the private physicians may have another. The outlook is actually quite grim. I have heard it said that those with symptoms can expect to lose 10-13 years of life expectancy. (or more, depending on the severity.)

The whole thing is utterly ridiculous, Early knowledge of dioxin problems began just after the turn of the last century, about 1910, as I seem to remember.

We are statistical lab rats. That is what the AO Registry is all about. "The Army Waiting to Die"....a book. When I deal with my VA PCP she knows nothing about AO. My pain doctor knows nothing about AO. Nobody at the VA treatment side knows anything about AO. It is written on my records "exposed to AO....Yes". This is just ignored.
Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

If you watch the congressional hearing of this hearing (about 2 hrs.)

http://veterans.house.gov/hearings/hearing.aspx?newsid=571 (click on the little multimedia link in the light blue box).

you will see the frustration congress has with the VA, over these issues. Congressman Filner reams the VA over their none production of reports that were promised since 2001. Congressman Strens?, almost comes right out and calls the main doctor a liar, after catching the doctor on his own BS statements.

The results of the NVVLS report are due, again, by 2014.

Below is an excerpt from the VA's own NVVLS white-papers.

In September 2001, the VA contracted with the Research Triangle Institute (RTI) to

develop and initiate an effort now termed the National Vietnam Veterans Longitudinal

Study (NVVLS).

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use