Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nvvls

Rate this question


Stretch

Question

  • In Memoriam

NATIONAL VIETNAM VETERANS LONGITUDINAL STUDY

Status Report and Update August 18, 2008

http://www.vvachapter1004.org/whitepapernvvls.pdf

Edited by Stretch

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • In Memoriam

Congressman Mr. Stearns is the correction of the congressmans name.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It is as if congress has no control over the VA. I know that the congress supplies the money to run the VA and to pay VA salaries. If they cannot control the VA and make them tow the line then who can? If they put some of these VA thugs in jail for contempt maybe they would get action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks Stretch, for the two and one half hours of Congressional viewing..... Four more years of studies to go, with no end in sight. That is my conclusion.

I think it's time for congress to pass a "Vietnam Veterans Reconciliation Act", and compel the VA to properly compensate RVN vets. Gen. Powell once said "You break it, you buy it". It's time the United States pay for the breakage of it's vets...

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hmmm....in 4 more years most of us will be near 65 to 70 years old. One step closer to the government's problem being solved in a permanent way. This is really what it is all about like 40 acres and a mule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A verbal beatdown in a congressional hearing just makes the congressman look good and the VA look bad for a few minutes.

I think the whole thing is scripted like pro wrestling.

Plenty of words and no real action.

A waste of tax dollars.

Smoke and mirrors.

Give me a break.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

I don't think it is a breakdown at all. I think that this is a set up, for showing that the VA, is incompetent in this matter, and further shows reasons for the passing of Congressman Filners bill. VA stalling, and the Supremes denial in following the VA decision, are two reasons for the passing of this VN chemical legislation.

The VA is just carrying out the DoD policy of denial, for DoD's own expansion. That is why the VA doesn't have any answers, to questions, in these hearing. DoD policy, of thinking of Vets as commodities or expendable machines, has to stop.

Recent comments by our leaders and their relative parts, have said that "These people have joined the military, and these people knew what they were doing", as a defense for their actions, are totally absurd.

Recruits are not told that they would be coated with "Toxic Chemicals or Dioxins" or exposed to "Depleted Uranium" or used for "Big Pharma drug Testing". Recruits are not told that they will be Guinea Pigs.

DoD had better start telling the truth, stop recruiting, or pay for broken Veterans. Citizens and Veterans have to know that the VA is an underling of the DoD and the reason for this conflict of interest.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use