Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Over 20 Years Served - Medical Vs. Regular Retikrement?

Rate this question


vaf

Question

I was helping a veteran who was planning to retire very soon with over 20 years served, when we just found out he had a seizure of unknown origin which caused him to wreck his car and someone else's. He ended up waking up in the ambulance and crushed his L5 disc, and he's now in the hospital. He called my husband just now, asking about how this would affect his retirement plans for the immediate future.

My husband told him to put his retirement on hold. I'm wondering, once he has his surgery and is otherwise stabilized, is he better off pursuing a medical retirement, or should he just retire based on time served and let the VA handle the issues?

My gut says to tell him to pursue a medical retirement, but I don't know if that's the best option for him.

May I get your opinions, please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't think it affects his retirement it will affect his VA benefits obviously since it is NOT combat related it will create the offset from retirement pay for his VA benefits which will then become non taxable income so the higher VA rating the better for his tax purposes I doubt his back injury will be severe enough to qualify him for SSD retirement but if he has further back problems or sciatica later in life it will help him qualify for higher percentages down the road all the time he spends on active duty after his back surgery will also give him more days towards his retirement and most of it will probably be spent on medical leave recuperating

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just found out that this gentleman, who is still active duty, had a prior seizure that was attributed to a reaction to meds he was prescribed for PTSD through the base military clinic (to an off-site doc, I assume, since it's just a clinic here and not a hospital).

This guy already has over 20 years served. My husband retired in the early 90's with over 20 served, but it was a medical retirement. He received 40% from the MEB/PEB process, so 40% of his retirement pay is tax exempt. Is that still the case when something like this happens to someone who served over 20 years?

I'm thinking that he shouldn't be discharged either way until he has back surgery to fix the damage from the car accident, and they find out exactly what caused the seizures. He's lucky he didn't kill himself or anyone else...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone has any knowledge of the tax consequences of retiring on a medical vs. regular retirement based on serving over 20 years, if any, I could use an education on that subject. I'm not sure that the tax benefits of a medical retirement over 20 that my husband currently enjoys are still available, since he retired in the early 1990's.

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The 20 career Vet can draw both VA & military retirement.

I think , you have to be at least 50% disabled.

Are you familiar with CRDP (Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments) ? here is a link for info.

http://www.military.com/benefits/military-...eceipt-overview

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I do know that civilian federal employees who retire on disability pay have to pay tax on their annuity. I bet it is the same for military.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

VAF

Well, I am no expert on the matter, but my VA benefits come tax free, and I am pretty sure retirement benefits are taxable...I know Social Security is taxable. They have a scale, depending upon how much other income you have that goes something like if you earn more than 44,000 in a year, then 85% of your Social Security is taxable. However, if you earn less than $44,000 per year, only 50% of your social security is taxable. (this assumes you are married filing jointly) More here:

http://www.ssa.gov/planners/taxes.htm

So, my advice would be to go medical unless the "regular" retirement was more because $30,000 per year non taxable is more than $30,000 per year minus taxes. JMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use