Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

An 54

Rate this question


rotorhead

Question

The new presumtive bill is no longer at OMB, look for it to be published as final rule on MONDAY!!!!!!!! Going to be a very good christmas for some very derserving veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

The new presumtive bill is no longer at OMB, look for it to be published as final rule on MONDAY!!!!!!!! Going to be a very good christmas for some very derserving veterans.

Thanks for the update rotorhead!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm new to this forum as a contributer. I have been watching it close since I discovered that VA was adding three New Presumptives. I had a heart attack back in March of 2005. I was granted total SS Disability for Ischemic Heart disease to that date. I sent in a claim for IHD and was denied in a letter dated November 8, 2005. Last week August 20, 2010 VA contacted me and told me that my record was with the Nehmer group at the VA in Muskogee OK. I asked would nehmer be applied to the "New Presumptives" and was told point blank that it would. I have been checking the OMB daily and discovered today that the Review was completed on Aug 25, 2010. I have been told that those who qualify may start recieving checks by the end of October since the Final Rules were completed in October. The following information is a copy and paste from the OMB's review:

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA)

Executive Order Submissions with Review Completed in Last 30 Days

August 28, 2010

Department of Veterans Affairs

AGENCY: VA RIN: 2900-AN54 TITLE: Diseases Associated With Exposure to Certain Herbicide Agents (Hairy Cell Leukemia and Other Chronic B Cell Leukemias, Parkinson’s Disease, and Ischemic Heart Disease) STAGE: Final Rule ECONOMICALLY SIGNIFICANT: Yes RECEIVED DATE: 07/08/2010 LEGAL DEADLINE: Statutory COMPLETED: 08/25/2010 COMPLETED ACTION: Consistent with Change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey darling...I am helping a Vet to get his benefits and he was in the blue water navy. He has prostate cancer and Diabetes...Does this include him? I need to know this so I can help him out...he can't do much and I am his legs..before mine die too! LOL

Thank you

Marti

A helping Vet her self:wink:

The new presumtive bill is no longer at OMB, look for it to be published as final rule on MONDAY!!!!!!!! Going to be a very good christmas for some very derserving veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Blue water navy....it won't be presumptive for AO via Vietnam/Blue water. He will have to show he set foot on Vietnam soil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blue water navy....it won't be presumptive for AO via Vietnam/Blue water. He will have to show he set foot on Vietnam soil.

john999 is correct. A crew member aboard a Vietnam era Blue water vessel must show their ship either docked at a VN port or traveled the brown waters of Vietnam during that era. There is a bill in congress to bring Blue Water Navy under the AO presumptive but no one knows at this time how it will fare.  Track    H.R. 2254:    Agent Orange Equity Act of 2009  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If the VA makes AO diseases presumptive for Blue Water Navy it will mean billions in disability. That is the complete bottom line. Not the science but the dollars. If they can kick it down the road another ten years there will many fewer vets to try and collect. This is their twisted and sick dream. Wait the vets out until they die off and then deal with the aging widows except ones like Berta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use