Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

My Imo Letter

Rate this question


Geo4K

Question

Attached is my letter I got from my doc. I will use it to:

* Try to SC my headaches and vertigo. My initial claim for vertigo was denied, as they only looked at an old case of inner ear infection that resolved. Hopefully this will get them to take a better look. I will claim both of these secondary to the DDD that they SC at 10%. Should I file a new claim for the vertigo, since they denied the 1st one for an entirely different casue?

* I will also ask for an increase of the left shoulder that they SC at 0%.

Any tips on what to say on my form to support my claim?

Thanks for your time,

George

VA Letter 2 black.pdf

USAF 1984 - 2005, MSgt ret.

50 % for social coping and depression - I want to challenge to 70%

20% Right Should Shoulder pain - radiating from neck

20% DDD C-Spine (C3-C4, C4-C5, C5-C6)

10% Tinnitus

10% Left Shoulder

0% Hypertension

0% Vertigo, Migraines - I want to challenge to 30%

 

 

Link to comment
  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

It would be good if your IMO could quote an in-service DX that shows how the injury happened in the words of a doctor. What did the military dx you with before you were discharged? Did a military doctor say you hurt your neck on duty?

Link to comment

John, sorry, I missed your comment until now.

My MSR does cover my visit to the clinic for the injury. The term the Mil doc used was SLAMMED, not bumped! I'll make that clear on my C&P visit on the 27th of this month, and yes, it was while I was on duty.

Carlie, thanks, again!

George

USAF 1984 - 2005, MSgt ret.

50 % for social coping and depression - I want to challenge to 70%

20% Right Should Shoulder pain - radiating from neck

20% DDD C-Spine (C3-C4, C4-C5, C5-C6)

10% Tinnitus

10% Left Shoulder

0% Hypertension

0% Vertigo, Migraines - I want to challenge to 30%

 

 

Link to comment

i am doing alot of research on getting my IMO done and came across your letter. i was just wondering if your doctor attached any exhibits to your IMO?

thanks, mark

Attached is my letter I got from my doc. I will use it to:

* Try to SC my headaches and vertigo. My initial claim for vertigo was denied, as they only looked at an old case of inner ear infection that resolved. Hopefully this will get them to take a better look. I will claim both of these secondary to the DDD that they SC at 10%. Should I file a new claim for the vertigo, since they denied the 1st one for an entirely different casue?

* I will also ask for an increase of the left shoulder that they SC at 0%.

Any tips on what to say on my form to support my claim?

Thanks for your time,

George

Link to comment

I am not George but Dr. Bash attached his 12 page Curriculum Vitae to the first opinion he did for me.He also referenced Braunwald -the top med text on cardiology in addition to Harrison's Principles.

I had sent him many internet medical printouts to support my claim but his use of Braunwald was good enough.

Have you used the info in our IMO forum as to the criteria for IMOs?

I developed this criteria from 2 IMOs I got from Dr. Bash- a former VA doctor himself so he knows what to look for and state when doing these IMOs.

I sent him cover letters for each opinion request that specifically identified records and other documents he needed to read.

Of course he read everything I sent but this made it a little easier for him I am sure.

I also included all SOCs and C & P exam results.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment

My last 2 C&P's, I too did an extensive internet search and took along 22 well documented medical study's and case examples which I highlighted and also wrote out different opinion scenerios too...I became friends over 2+ years with the C & P staff and the medical director of this area. They knew I got shafted years before so they were willing to assist me with what should had been decided in my favor years before.( It probably helped that I am an RN too) Any way medical information that can be related to your diagnosis, condition, treatment, etc can be of significant value to your clain, if the diagnosis is the same or similar. Good luck with this.

BTW they did use alot of my reference material and put it in the exam material, and the VARO referenced the info as decision assistance with the granting of my 100% P T award!

Edited by halos2
Link to comment


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use